Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Rehabil Nurs ; 39(1): 26-35, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23780793

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effectiveness of a safe patient handling program (STEPS) at an inpatient rehabilitation unit in reducing injury due to patient transfers. Our objectives were to compare number of staff injuries during the 1.5-year period post training to pre training (baseline) and to determine whether reduction in injuries was sustained long term during a 2.5-year post training period. METHODS: All nursing and therapy staff as well as new hires received STEPS training. Periodic retraining was not provided. FINDINGS: The number of injuries was significantly reduced at post training compared to baseline (p = 0.01). However, the reductions in injuries were not sustained long term. CONCLUSION: We estimated a cost benefit of $3.71 for every dollar invested in retraining based on injury reduction realized during the post training period. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Retraining is likely to have a positive cost benefit when it results in maintaining reduction in staff injuries.


Subject(s)
Moving and Lifting Patients/methods , Nursing Staff/education , Occupational Injuries/prevention & control , Patient Safety/standards , Rehabilitation Nursing/methods , Staff Development/methods , Aged , Education, Nursing, Continuing , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Moving and Lifting Patients/standards , Rehabilitation Nursing/education , Rehabilitation Nursing/standards , Time
2.
J Surg Educ ; 64(4): 199-203, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17706571

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Trauma training among nonsurgical physicians in the military is highly variable in amount and quality. However, all deployed military physicians, regardless of specialty, are expected to provide combat casualty care. The goal was to assess the effectiveness of an intense modular trauma refresher course for nonsurgical physicians deploying to a combat zone. METHODS: All graduating nonsurgical residents participated in this 2.5-day course, consisting of 4 modules: (1) didactic session; (2) simulation with interactive human surgical simulators; (3) case presentations and triage scenarios from Iraq/Afghanistan with associated skill stations; and (4) live tissue surgical procedure laboratory. Competency tests, surveys, and after action comments were reviewed and compared before and after course completion. RESULTS: Between May 2005 and April 2007, 60 physicians participated in the course. By specialties, there were 32 internists, 16 pediatricians, 7 general practitioners, 4 obstetricians/gynecologists, and 1 "other" nonsurgical physician represented. Precourse and postcourse tests were administered to 31 of 60 participants. The mean test scores improved from 76% to 96% upon completion of the course (p < 0.01). Additionally, self-perceived confidence levels in handling battlefield casualties from questionnaires based on Likert scale responses (1 = not confident, 5 = confident) improved from an average of 2.3 before the course to 3.9 upon completion of the course (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: All military physicians must be prepared to manage combat casualties. This hybrid training model may be an effective method to prepare nonsurgeons to deal with battle injuries. This course significantly improved the knowledge and confidence among primary care physicians.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Military Medicine/education , Warfare , Teaching/methods , Traumatology/education , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...