Does virtual reality in the preoperative setting for colorectal cancer surgery improve patient understanding? A randomized pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) enhanced radiology could help improve communication with colorectal cancer patients and therefore increase understanding in the perioperative setting. The objective of this pilot trial is to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomized control trial in terms of recruitment, use and acceptability of the VR technology and validity of data collection methods. METHODS: A prospective, single-centre randomized control trial was conducted at St John of God Midland Hospital in Western Australia from November to December 2021. After standard informed consent with their surgeon, elective patients planned for resection of colorectal cancer were randomized to either 'standard consent' (shown computed tomography (CT) images only) or 'VR consent' (shown CT images and immersive VR models). RESULTS: Nine patients were recruited (four control; five intervention). There was a trend towards improved patient reported understanding without reaching statistical significance. Most patients preferred the use of VR as compared to CT as an educational tool during the consent process (P = 0.03). There were no adverse effects. CONCLUSION: VR was well tolerated and patients enjoyed using the technology. Its use in an outpatient clinic setting for elective colorectal cancer surgery is feasible. Improvement in patient understanding using VR compared to standard consent processes in colorectal surgery should be tested in a statistically powered, high quality study design.

Acute abdomen in third trimester of pregnancy-a rare case of perforated Meckel's diverticulitis.

Acute abdomen in pregnancy presents many diagnostic challenges. Non-specific symptoms, anatomical and physiological changes and diagnostic imaging limitations lead to diagnostic uncertainty and delayed diagnosis and treatment. Meckel's diverticulitis in pregnancy is extremely rare with only 27 cases reported in literature, only 11 of which are found to be perforated intraoperatively. We present a rare case of a patient in third trimester of pregnancy with perforated Meckel's diverticulitis.

Colorectal Surgery in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis poses a significant challenge due to the associated peri-operative morbidity and mortality risks. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the outcomes in this cohort of patients following colorectal surgery. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases and references were searched up to October 2022 using the PRISMA guidelines. The data collated included: patient demographics, pathology or type of colorectal operation performed, severity of liver cirrhosis, post-operative complication rates, mortality rates and prognostic factors. A quality assessment of included studies was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: Sixteen studies reporting the outcomes of colorectal surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis were identified, including the results of 8646 patients. The indications, pathologies and/or type of operations varied. The overall complication rate ranged from 29 to 75%, minor complication ranged 14.5-37% and major complication ranged 6.7-59.3%. The mortality rates ranged from 0 to 37%. CONCLUSION: Colorectal surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis still carries considerable morbidity and mortality rates. This group of patients needs to be managed in a multidisciplinary setting to achieve excellent outcomes. Future research should focus on uniform definitions to enable interpretable outcomes.

Utility of CT colonography and/or PET-CT preoperatively in obstructing left-sided colorectal cancers - a systematic review.

PURPOSE: 15-20% of patients present with near obstructing left-sided colorectal cancer. CT colonography (CTC) or PET-CT has been used to detect synchronous lesions, which may alter preoperative planning of colonic resection. We aim to synthesize the usefulness of CT colonography and/or PET-CT in detecting synchronous proximal colon carcinomas in patients who have undergone an incomplete colonoscopy due to a stenosing or obstructing distal colorectal cancer. METHODOLOGY: A systematic review was performed by searching the databases up to December 2021. Data collected included demographics of the study population, rate of detection of synchronous carcinomas and impact on management of detection of synchronous carcinomas. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies were included: 17 studies focused on CTC, 3 on PET-CT, and 2 integrated PET-CT with CTC; 2855 patients were included; 53% of patients were male, and 47% were female. All studies reported detection of synchronous proximal colorectal carcinomas using CTC, PET-CT or CTC, and PET-CT combined. CTC detected synchronous carcinomas in 0.2-12.2% of patients. PET-CT was useful in detecting synchronous carcinomas in 4.05-23% of patients. Integrated PET-CT and CTC detected synchronous carcinomas in 2-15% of patients. The surgical plan was changed in 2.4-14.3% of patients after the use of CTC. One PET-CT study reported a change in management in 13.5%. No complication was reported by the use of CTC. CONCLUSION: CTC is an effective and useful adjunct to colonoscopy in assessing the proximal colon when colonoscopy fails to do so. However, more evidence is needed with the use of PET-CT for this patient population.

Single-centre experience of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective comparison of conventional-linear closure and purse-string closure on surgical-site-infection rates.

BACKGROUND: The closure of ileostomy is associated with significant morbidity, the most common being surgical site infection (SSI), ranging up to 41%. This study compared the stoma site SSI rates after either the conventional-linear closure (CLC) or purse-string closure (PSC). METHODS: The study conducted a single-centre retrospective cohort study of elective loop-ileostomy closures from June 2015 to January 2021. Patient demographics, surgical techniques and outcomes, including SSI rates, were analysed using SPSS ver.27. RESULTS: Hundred and six patients underwent loop-ileostomy closure, 91.5% (n = 97) had CLC of which 67% (n = 65) were stapled. Male patients comprise 67.9%, with a median age of 62. The median BMI was 27. The median surgical time, LOS and interval time to closure were 66 min, 4.5 days and 5.5 months, respectively. The SSI rate was 19.6% (n = 19) for CLC and 11.1% (n = 1) for PSC. The SSI rate was significantly reduced to 3.7% (P < 0.001) in CLC when the site was washed with betadine. Multivariate logistic regression controlled for statistically insignificant confounders showed that stoma site betadine wash was significantly and independently associated with reduced SSI risk (P = 0.026). Other significant factors which reduced SSI risk were prophylactic antibiotic therapy (P = 0.004), operative time < 60 min (P = 0.021), and having the closure done >3 months post the formation surgery (P = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that stoma SSI risk was independently and significantly reduced when CLC stapled site was washed with betadine. This low-cost intervention that significantly reduced skin closure site SSI rates is readily available and can easily be adopted into clinical practice.

Readmission Within the First Day of Discharge Is Painful: Experience From an Australian General Surgical Service.

Background Unplanned readmission to the hospital after discharge is a costly issue for healthcare systems and patients. It is a delicate balance between the resolution of the surgical problem and the length of hospital stay. Most studies have focused on readmissions within 28 or 30 days after discharge, despite data showing that many occur early in this period. This study examined the reasons for unplanned readmission within the first day after discharge.  Methods A retrospective cohort analysis of readmissions between 1st May 2016 and 1st May 2021 was undertaken by chart review. Readmissions on the "day of" and the "day after" discharge and their respective index admissions were identified via the hospital's patient administration database, webPAS (DXC Technology, USA). Results There were 126 readmissions (0.5%) across 25,119 admissions. Common reasons for readmission were pain (28%, n=35), readmission for the same diagnosis (21%, n=26), surgical site infection (SSI) (11%, n=14), bleeding (11%, n=14) and ileus (6%, n=7). Analysis of index admissions showed that 18/35 readmissions for pain had inadequate pain management based on pain scores, analgesic use and discharge medications and 7/14 readmissions for SSI did not have appropriate treatment of a recognised SSI or did not have antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines adhered to. Fourteen of 26 readmissions for the same diagnosis received just continuation of treatment initiated at index admission.  Conclusion Pain is the most common reason for readmission within the first day after discharge in surgical patients. Better pain management, following antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines, and involving patients in discharge planning could prevent many readmissions.

Weight bias among health care professionals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Weight-biased attitudes and views held by health care professionals can have a negative impact on the patient-provider relationship and the provision of care, but studies have found mixed results about the extent and nature of bias, which warrants a review of the evidence. METHODS: A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis were conducted by including studies up to January 12, 2021. RESULTS: A total of 41 studies met inclusion criteria, with 17 studies providing sufficient data to be meta-analyzed. A moderate pooled effect (standardized mean difference = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.37-0.96) showed that health care professionals demonstrate implicit weight bias. Health care professionals also report explicit weight bias on the Fat Phobia Scale, Antifat Attitudes Scale, and Attitudes Towards Obese Persons Scale. Findings show that medical doctors, nurses, dietitians, psychologists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, speech pathologists, podiatrists, and exercise physiologists hold implicit and/or explicit weight-biased attitudes toward people with obesity. A total of 27 different outcomes were used to measure weight bias, and the overall quality of evidence was rated as very low. CONCLUSIONS: Future research needs to adopt more robust research methods to improve the assessment of weight bias and to inform future interventions to address weight bias among health care professionals.

Post-colonoscopy diverticulitis: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Post-colonoscopy diverticulitis is increasingly recognized as a potential complication. However, the evidence is sparse in the literature. AIM: To systematically review all available evidence to describe the incidence, clinical course with management and propose a definition. METHODS: The databases PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched using with the keywords up to June 2020. Additional manual search was performed and cross-checked for additional references. Data collected included demographics, reason for colonoscopy, time to diagnosis, method of diagnosis (clinical vs imaging) and management outcomes. RESULTS: A total of nine studies were included in the final systematic review with a total of 339 cases. The time to diagnosis post-colonoscopy ranged from 2 h to 30 d. Clinical presentation for these patients were non-specific including abdominal pain, nausea/vomiting, per rectal bleeding and chills/fever. Majority of the cases were diagnosed based on computed tomography scan. The management for these patients were similar to the usual patients presenting with diverticulitis where most resolve with non-operative intervention (i.e., antibiotics and bowel rest). CONCLUSION: The entity of post-colonoscopy diverticulitis remains contentious where there is a wide duration post-procedure included. Regardless of whether this is a true complication post-colonoscopy or a de novo event, early diagnosis is vital to guide appropriate treatment. Further prospective studies especially registries should include this as a complication to try to capture the true incidence.

The role of quantitative radiological measures of visceral adiposity in diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: Diverticular disease has been linked to obesity. Recent studies have assessed the role of visceral adiposity with diverticulitis and its complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of quantitative radiological measures of visceral adiposity in patients with diverticulitis with vital signs, biochemistry results, uncomplicated versus complicated diverticulitis and its interventions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients with diverticulitis admitted from November 2015 to April 2018 at a single institution was performed. Data collected included demographics, vital signs, biochemistry results, CT scan findings and management outcomes. The patients were divided into uncomplicated (U) and complicated diverticulitis (C) groups. Visceral fat area (VFA), subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and VFA/SFA ratio (V/S) were measured at L4/L5 level by the radiologist. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the association of VFA, SFA, V/S with the parameters in both U and C groups. RESULTS: 352 patients were included in this study (U:C = 265:87). There was no significant difference in vital signs and biochemistry results in both groups. There was no significant difference in VFA, SFA, V/S ratios in both groups. In patients with V/S ratio > 0.4, they were 5.06 times more likely to undergo emergency intervention (95% CI 1.10-23.45) (p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, a heart rate > 100 (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.2-6.7), CRP > 50 (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.9-6.0), WCC < 4 or > 12 (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.6) and V/S ratio > 0.4 (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5-5.4) were predictive of complicated diverticulitis. CONCLUSION: The quantitative radiological measurement of visceral adiposity is useful in prognostication in patients presenting with diverticulitis.

Opportunistic use of radiological measures of visceral adiposity for assessment of risk of colorectal adenoma.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggested that radiological measures of visceral adiposity are a better tool for risk assessment of colorectal adenomas. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of visceral adiposity with the development of colorectal adenomas. METHODS: A retrospective review of all cases of computed tomography-confirmed acute diverticulitis from November 2015 to April 2018 was performed. Data collated included basic demographics, computed tomography scan results (uncomplicated versus complicated diverticulitis), treatment modality (conservative versus intervention), outcomes and follow-up colonoscopy results within 12 months of presentation. The patients were divided into no adenoma (A) and adenoma (B) groups. Visceral fat area (VFA), subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and VFA/SFA ratio (V/S) were measured at L4/L5 level. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluation the association of VFA, SFA, V/S and different thresholds with the risk of adenoma formation. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients were included in this study (A:B = 123:46). The mean ± standard deviation for VFA was higher in group B (201 ± 87 cm2 versus 176 ± 79 cm2 ) with a trend towards statistical significance (P = 0.08). There was no difference in SFA and V/S in both groups. When the VFA >200 cm2 was analysed, it was associated with a threefold risk of adenoma formation (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.35-5.50, P = 0.006). Subgroup analysis of gender with VFA, SFA and V/S found that males have a significantly higher VFA in group B (220.0 ± 95.2 cm2 versus 187.3 ± 69.2 cm2 ; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The radiological measurement of visceral adiposity is a useful tool for opportunistic assessment of risk of colorectal adenoma.

Assessing the efficacy of TNF-alpha inhibitors in preventing emergency and emergent colectomies.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Severe ulcerative colitis (UC) is potentially life threatening and is associated with significant morbidity. TNF-∝ inhibitors (Infliximab) were introduced in Australia for the management of medically resistant, acute, severe flares of UC in 2008. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of Infliximab in preventing emergent and emergency colectomies for patients with moderate to severe UC by comparing colectomy rates before and after its introduction at our institution. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who were admitted to the Royal Perth Hospital with a flare of UC between 2002 and 2017. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those admitted prior to the introduction of Infliximab (pre-2008) and those admitted after. We compared data between these two groups, including age, gender, length of admission, use of Infliximab, colectomy, and complications of surgery. We defined emergency surgery as requiring surgery during the index admission and emergent surgery as an operation within 54 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 313 UC cases from 2002 to 2017 were analyzed. There was a decrease in emergency and emergent colectomies from 19.4 to 8% in the post-2008 cohort (P = 0.008). Furthermore, there was a decrease in the proportion of operations performed as emergencies, from 36 to 20%. This resulted in a significantly reduced length of stay (13.4-9.7 days, P < 0.05) and complication rate (36 to 20%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Overall, the need for emergency and emergent operations has drastically reduced at our institution with the introduction of Infliximab. This study has confirmed the efficacy of Infliximab in reducing colectomy rates at our institution.

Jejunal Diverticulitis: A Single-Center Experience and Proposed Management Algorithm.

Background: Jejunal diverticulitis is rare and usually an incidental diagnosis found on imaging. Its symptoms are non-specific. Hence, the diagnosis often is delayed, and a high mortality rate has been reported. The aim of this study was to review our experience in the management of jejunal diverticulitis and to propose a management algorithm. Methods: A retrospective review of all cases of jejunal diverticulitis seen from November 2015 to November 2018 was performed. Data collected included demographics, history of diverticulitis, risk factors, clinical presentation, biochemistry and imaging results, and management outcome. Results: Eight patients were identified during the study period, five females and three males with a median age of 71 years (range 61-85 years). One patient was on steroid treatment, and one patient had a history of jejunal diverticulitis. Abdominal pain was present in all patients, but other symptoms were variable. Two patients were initially believed to have constipation and were discharged home. All patients underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan for the diagnosis, showing that three had uncomplicated jejunal diverticulitis and five had localized perforation. Five patients were managed conservatively initially; two failed this treatment because of small bowel obstruction and persistent abdominal pain with rising inflammatory markers. Three underwent emergency laparotomy (two because of sepsis; one was thought to have a foreign body). There were no deaths. A proposed management algorithm is discussed. Conclusions: A CT scan is the mainstay for the accurate diagnosis of jejunal diverticulitis. The proposed algorithm can aid in selection of patients suitable for conservative management.

Colonic transit: what is the impact of a diverting loop ileostomy?

BACKGROUND: Diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) is used following low anterior resections (LAR) or ultra-low anterior resections (ULAR) to reduce anastomotic leak (AL). Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) is traditionally used with DLI. However, clearance of the left colon can be achieved with a fleet enema without the physiological compromise of MBP. We aimed to assess colonic transit following DLI in this context. METHODS: A prospective, observational study was performed with patients with rectal cancer undergoing LAR or ULAR in a tertiary colorectal unit with preoperative fleet enema. Radiopaque markers were inserted into the caecum following rectal resection and formation of a DLI with placement confirmed by image intensifier and endoscopy. X-rays were performed at days 1, 3, 5 and 14 post-operation with data collected prospectively. RESULTS: Ten patients (mean age 57, nine males) were enrolled. Mean time to functioning stoma was 1.9 days (range 1-3). There was no movement in the majority of markers in all patients at Day 5 post-operation. In all seven patients with Day 14 X-rays, the majority of markers remained in the right colon. Two patients had delayed AL, with markers found within the pelvis in both of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to assess colonic transit following DLI using fleet enema only, with results suggesting colonic motility is abolished in this setting. The use of a fleet enema without MBP may be sufficient prior to rectal resection surgery when DLI is employed. AL may actually increase colonic transit. Further research is warranted.