Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 27
Filter
1.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 239(11): 3731-3741, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36227352

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), an active component of cannabis, can cause anxiety in some users during intoxication. Cannabidiol (CBD), another constituent of cannabis, has anxiolytic properties suggesting that cannabis products containing CBD in addition to THC may produce less anxiety than THC-only products. Findings to date around this issue have been inconclusive and could conceivably depend on moderating factors such as baseline anxiety levels in users. OBJECTIVE: The present study examined whether anxiety following single doses of vaporised THC, CBD and THC/CBD might be explained by state and trait anxiety levels at baseline. METHODS: A placebo-controlled, randomised, within-subjects study including 26 healthy recreational cannabis users tested the effects of vaporised THC-dominant cannabis (13.75 mg THC), CBD-dominant cannabis (13.75 mg CBD), THC/CBD-equivalent cannabis (13.75 mg THC/13.75 mg CBD) and placebo cannabis on anxiety. Self-rated trait anxiety was assessed with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). State levels of anxiety were objectively assessed with a computer-based emotional Stroop task (EST) and subjectively rated with the STAI-state questionnaire and a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Both THC and THC/CBD significantly increased self-rated state anxiety compared to placebo. State anxiety after THC/CBD was significantly lower than after THC alone. THC-induced anxiety was independent of anxiety at baseline. When baseline anxiety was low, CBD completely counteracted THC-induced anxiety; however, when baseline anxiety was high, CBD did not counteract THC-induced anxiety. There were no effects of any treatment condition on the EST. CONCLUSION: Overall, the study demonstrated that the THC/CBD-equivalent cannabis induces less state anxiety than THC-dominant cannabis.


Subject(s)
Anti-Anxiety Agents , Cannabidiol , Cannabis , Hallucinogens , Humans , Cannabidiol/pharmacology , Dronabinol/pharmacology , Hallucinogens/pharmacology , Anxiety/chemically induced , Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists
2.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 2449, 2022 02 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35165360

ABSTRACT

Resting state fMRI has been employed to identify alterations in functional connectivity within or between brain regions following acute and chronic exposure to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive component in cannabis. Most studies focused a priori on a limited number of local brain areas or circuits, without considering the impact of cannabis on whole-brain network organization. The present study attempted to identify changes in the whole-brain human functional connectome as assessed with ultra-high field (7T) resting state scans of cannabis users (N = 26) during placebo and following vaporization of cannabis. Two distinct data-driven methodologies, i.e. network-based statistics (NBS) and connICA, were used to identify changes in functional connectomes associated with acute cannabis intoxication and history of cannabis use. Both methodologies revealed a broad state of hyperconnectivity within the entire range of major brain networks in chronic cannabis users compared to occasional cannabis users, which might be reflective of an adaptive network reorganization following prolonged cannabis exposure. The connICA methodology also extracted a distinct spatial connectivity pattern of hypoconnectivity involving the dorsal attention, limbic, subcortical and cerebellum networks and of hyperconnectivity between the default mode and ventral attention network, that was associated with the feeling of subjective high during THC intoxication. Whole-brain network approaches identified spatial patterns in functional brain connectomes that distinguished acute from chronic cannabis use, and offer an important utility for probing the interplay between short and long-term alterations in functional brain dynamics when progressing from occasional to chronic use of cannabis.


Subject(s)
Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/physiopathology , Cannabis/chemistry , Connectome/methods , Dronabinol/administration & dosage , Marijuana Smoking/physiopathology , Marijuana Smoking/psychology , Plant Extracts/administration & dosage , Psychotropic Drugs/administration & dosage , Adult , Attention/drug effects , Cognition/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Emotions/drug effects , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Young Adult
3.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 36: 191-205, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32014378

ABSTRACT

Acute exposure to cannabis comes with neurocognitive impairment, leading to increased risk of human error and injury. Evidence however indicates that such acute effects are less prominent in chronic users, suggesting cannabis tolerance. Models of cannabis tolerance stress the importance of neurobiological or behavioral adaptations following repeated cannabis exposure. The pharmacodynamic model relates neuroadaptive changes in the brain to a blunted response to cannabis. Downregulation of CB1 receptors in chronic cannabis users has been associated with a normalization of dopaminergic output from the ventral tegmental area to the mesolimbic circuit, and a reduction of impairment during acute cannabis exposure. Such neuroadaptions are absent in occasional users, who show strong increments of dopamine and glutamate levels in the striatum, a loss of functional connectivity within the mesolimbic circuit and neurocognitive impairments when exposed to cannabis. Evidence for a behavioral model of cannabis tolerance that poses that users can have volitional control to overcome functional impairment during cannabis intoxication is relatively weak, and at best shows limited control over a limited number of behavioral functions. Cannabis tolerance is most likely to occur in users that consume high doses of cannabis continuously, at a high pace, for a prolonged period of time. Knowledge on frequency, dose and duration of cannabis use that is needed to achieve, maintain or lessen tolerance however is very limited, but will be of importance in the context of cannabis therapeutics and in legal settings when evaluating the impact of cannabis exposure on human function.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Physiological/physiology , Dronabinol/metabolism , Drug Tolerance/physiology , Hallucinogens/metabolism , Marijuana Use/metabolism , Receptors, Cannabinoid/metabolism , Adaptation, Physiological/drug effects , Animals , Brain/drug effects , Brain/metabolism , Dronabinol/pharmacology , Hallucinogens/pharmacology , Humans , Marijuana Use/psychology , Marijuana Use/trends
4.
J Psychoactive Drugs ; 51(3): 225-235, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30676284

ABSTRACT

The phenethylamine 4-fluoroamphetamine (4-FA) is a so-called novel psychoactive substance with a chemical structure resembling that of amphetamine and MDMA. Since 4-FA users report their subjective experience ranges between the effects induced by amphetamine and MDMA, and it is known that both substances can produce an altered state of consciousness, this study tests whether 4-FA induces a psychedelic state. A placebo-controlled two-way crossover study in 12 healthy poly-drug users was conducted to test subjective and behavioral effects of 4-FA. 4-FA concentrations were determined in serum up to 12 hours after administration and a series of questionnaires and the picture concept test were administered between one hour and 11 hours post-administration. Findings showed that 4-FA induced a psychedelic state which was highest one hour after 4-FA administration, at peak 4-FA serum concentrations. The 4-FA-induced psychedelic state decreased over time and was in general associated with the decreasing 4-FA serum concentrations. There was no 4-FA-induced change in creative (flexible) thinking. It is concluded that while the 4-FA-induced psychedelic state is mild in intensity and in between that produced by amphetamine and MDMA as hypothesized, more research is needed to indicate whether 4-FA can change creative thinking.


Subject(s)
Amphetamines/pharmacology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacology , Hallucinogens/pharmacology , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult
5.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 235(8): 2349-2356, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29855660

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: New psychoactive substances (NPS) are chemical analogues designed to mimic the effects of various classic recreational drugs of abuse including MDMA, LSD, and cannabis. NPS use is associated with concern about the acute and longer-term effects particular substances might have, with abuse and addiction as potential consequences. Impulsivity and sensitivity to the rewarding effects of drugs have been considered as risk factors for drug abuse. In light of the popularity of 4-fluoroamphetamine (4-FA), it is important to assess whether 4-FA can lead to subjective drug liking and wanting, and impulsive behavior, all factors contributing to the abuse likelihood of a substance. METHODS: A placebo-controlled 2-way crossover study in 12 healthy poly-drug using participants was conducted to test subjective and behavioral effects of 4-FA (100 mg). 4-FA concentrations were determined in serum up to 12 h after administration and two impulsivity tasks and two drug experience questionnaires assessing drug liking and wanting, and good and bad drug effect, were administered between 1 and 11 h post-administration. RESULTS: Findings showed that 4-FA did not affect impulsive behavior. Self-ratings of drug liking and wanting and good drug effect were increased 1 h after administration; this effect was absent 11 h after drug intake. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: To conclude, 4-FA (single dose) increased self-rated liking and wanting, which is known to contribute to the abuse likelihood of a substance; however, it left another factor impulsive behavior unaffected. It has to be noted that the current picture is limited and might change with increased sample size, and/or different 4-FA doses. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial acronym: 4-FA. URL: http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=6164 . Registration number: NTR6164 (Dutch clinical trial registry number).


Subject(s)
Amphetamines/pharmacology , Behavior, Addictive/psychology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacology , Emotions/drug effects , Impulsive Behavior/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Amphetamines/blood , Behavior, Addictive/blood , Central Nervous System Stimulants/blood , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Emotions/physiology , Female , Humans , Illicit Drugs/blood , Illicit Drugs/pharmacology , Impulsive Behavior/physiology , Male , Reward , Risk Factors , Young Adult
6.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 1061, 2018 01 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29348651

ABSTRACT

MDMA exerts its main effects via the serotonergic system and the serotonin transporter. The gene coding for this transporter determines the expression rate of the transporter. Previously it was shown that healthy individuals with the short allelic variant ('s-group') of the 5-HTTLPR-polymorphism displayed more anxiety and negative mood, and had a lower transcriptional efficiency compared to individuals who are homozygous for the l-allele ('l-group'). The present study aimed to investigate the role of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism in MDMA-induced mood effects. Four placebo-controlled, within-subject studies were pooled, including in total 63 polydrug ecstasy users (Ns-group = 48; Nl-group = 15) receiving MDMA 75 mg and placebo on two test days, separated by minimally 7 days. Mood was assessed by means of the Profile of Mood States. Findings showed that MDMA induced -independent of sex- a positive mood state, and as a side effect also increased two negative affect states, anxiety and confusion. Anxiety ratings were higher in the l-group and independent of treatment or sex. Depression ratings were lowered by MDMA in the female l-group. Findings indicate that the MDMA-induced reduction in self-rated depressive feelings is sex- and genotype-dependent, with females homozygous for the l-allele showing this beneficial effect.


Subject(s)
Affect/drug effects , Alleles , Depression/etiology , Depression/psychology , Drug Users , N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine/adverse effects , Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Homozygote , Humans , Young Adult
7.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 234(5): 837-844, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28070617

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The on-the-road highway driving test is generally regarded as a gold standard for assessing drug-induced driving impairment. The primary outcome measure is the standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP), a measure of road tracking error or "weaving". The test has been calibrated for incremental doses of alcohol almost 30 years ago in order to define the impact of drug-induced impairment in terms of blood alcohol concentration (BAC) equivalents. Drug-induced changes in SDLP exceeding 2.4 cm have been evaluated as clinically relevant ever since. The present analysis was conducted to assess the robustness of the alcohol effect in a range of on-the-road driving studies which have been conducted since the initial alcohol calibration study. METHODS: The present study pooled data of 182 participants from nine placebo-controlled crossover studies who performed the highway driving test, while their BAC was at or just below the legal limit for drivers (i.e., 0.5 g/L). RESULTS: Overall, mean SDLP increased with 2.5 cm (95% CI 2.0-2.9 cm). Equivalence testing showed that the clinical relevance criterion value of 2.4 cm fell well within the 95% CI in each individual study. Gender did not affect alcohol-induced changes in SDLP. DISCUSSION: These results demonstrate the robustness and validity of the clinical relevance criterion for SDLP as measured during on-the-road driving.


Subject(s)
Automobile Driving , Blood Alcohol Content , Driving Under the Influence , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychomotor Performance , Young Adult
9.
J Psychopharmacol ; 30(12): 1305-1312, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27562197

ABSTRACT

Recreational use of mephedrone, alone and in combination with alcohol, has increased over the past years. Pharmacological properties of mephedrone share similarities with methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), but its effect on neurocognitive function has not been well established in humans. The present study assessed the effect of mephedrone alone and after co-administration with alcohol on neurocognitive function. It was hypothesised that mephedrone would improve psychomotor performance but impair memory performance, when administered alone. Neurocognitive performance was expected to be impaired following mephedrone when combined with alcohol. Eleven participants received single doses of 200 mg mephedrone or placebo combined with 0.8 g/kg alcohol or placebo. Neurocognitive performance was assessed at baseline (T0), at one hour (T1) and four hours after (T2) mephedrone administration, by means of the Divided Attention Task (DAT), Critical Tracking Task (CTT), and the Spatial Memory Test (SMT). Mephedrone intoxication impaired short-term spatial memory at T1 and improved critical tracking performance at T2 Mephedrone alone did not affect divided attention, but did show an interaction with alcohol on reaction time at T2 Reaction time decreased when mephedrone was combined with alcohol as compared to alcohol alone. Alcohol intoxication impaired both short- and long-term spatial memory at T1 and divided attention at T1 and T2 Critical tracking performance was not affected by alcohol intoxication. The current findings support the hypothesis that mephedrone improves psychomotor performance, impairs spatial memory and does not affect divided attention performance. Stimulatory effects of mephedrone were not sufficient to compensate for the impairing effects of alcohol on most performance parameters.


Subject(s)
Cognition/drug effects , Ethanol/pharmacology , Methamphetamine/analogs & derivatives , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Adult , Attention/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Male , Memory, Short-Term/drug effects , Methamphetamine/pharmacology , N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine/pharmacology , Reaction Time/drug effects , Young Adult
10.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 233(18): 3461-9, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27488192

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies demonstrated that mequitazine produces mild sedation after single doses. Its enantiomer, l-mequitazine, has a stronger potency for the H1 receptor. The aim of the current study was to assess the effects of l-mequitazine and mequitazine, alone and with alcohol, on driving. METHODS: Twenty-five healthy volunteers were treated with l-mequitazine 2.5, 5.0 and 10 mg, mequitazine 10 mg and placebo, alone and in combination with alcohol in a double-blind crossover design. Driving performance was assessed using the standardized highway driving test in normal traffic. Its primary measure is the Standard Deviation of the Lateral Position (SDLP). Secondary measures consisted of an auditory word learning test during driving, and subjective measures of driving performance. RESULTS: L-mequitazine 2.5 and 5.0 mg showed no effect on SDLP in the highway driving test, while SDLP significantly increased after l-mequitazine 10 mg (alone +1.59 cm; with alcohol +1.41 cm) and mequitazine 10 mg (with alcohol +1.17 cm). Alcohol significantly impaired all performance measures (SDLP +2.63 cm) but did not interact with the effects of treatment. Subjective measures indicated that participants were aware of the impairing effects of alcohol, but not of l-mequitazine and mequitazine. CONCLUSION: L-mequitazine can be considered safe to drive in dosages of 2.5 and 5.0 mg. L-mequitazine 10 mg led to mild driving impairment. Alcohol impaired all performance measures and added to the effects of l-mequitazine and mequitazine.


Subject(s)
Automobile Driving , Central Nervous System Depressants/pharmacology , Driving Under the Influence , Ethanol/pharmacology , Histamine H1 Antagonists/pharmacology , Phenothiazines/pharmacology , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
11.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 233(18): 3395-403, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27435062

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Ayahuasca is a South American psychotropic plant tea traditionally used in Amazonian shamanism. The tea contains the psychedelic 5-HT2A receptor agonist N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT), plus ß-carboline alkaloids with monoamine oxidase-inhibiting properties. Increasing evidence from anecdotal reports and open-label studies indicates that ayahuasca may have therapeutic effects in treatment of substance use disorders and depression. A recent study on the psychological effects of ayahuasca found that the tea reduces judgmental processing and inner reactivity, classic goals of mindfulness psychotherapy. Another psychological facet that could potentially be targeted by ayahuasca is creative divergent thinking. This mode of thinking can enhance and strengthen psychological flexibility by allowing individuals to generate new and effective cognitive, emotional, and behavioral strategies. The present study aimed to assess the potential effects of ayahuasca on creative thinking. METHODS: We visited two spiritual ayahuasca workshops and invited participants to conduct creativity tests before and during the acute effects of ayahuasca. In total, 26 participants consented. Creativity tests included the "pattern/line meanings test" (PLMT) and the "picture concept test" (PCT), both assessing divergent thinking and the latter also assessing convergent thinking. RESULTS: While no significant effects were found for the PLMT, ayahuasca intake significantly modified divergent and convergent thinking as measured by the PCT. While convergent thinking decreased after intake, divergent thinking increased. CONCLUSIONS: The present data indicate that ayahuasca enhances creative divergent thinking. They suggest that ayahuasca increases psychological flexibility, which may facilitate psychotherapeutic interventions and support clinical trial initiatives.


Subject(s)
Banisteriopsis , Cognition/drug effects , Creativity , Hallucinogens/pharmacology , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Thinking/drug effects , Adult , Aged , Alkaloids , Banisteriopsis/chemistry , Carbolines , Female , Humans , Judgment/drug effects , Male , Middle Aged , Mindfulness , Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors , N,N-Dimethyltryptamine , Psychotropic Drugs/pharmacology , Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A , Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Agonists
12.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 233(18): 3331-40, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27422568

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Alcohol and cannabis use have been implicated in aggression. Alcohol consumption is known to facilitate aggression, whereas a causal link between cannabis and aggression has not been clearly demonstrated. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the acute effects of alcohol and cannabis on subjective aggression in alcohol and cannabis users, respectively, following aggression exposure. Drug-free controls served as a reference. It was hypothesized that aggression exposure would increase subjective aggression in alcohol users during alcohol intoxication, whereas it was expected to decrease subjective aggression in cannabis users during cannabis intoxication. METHODS: Heavy alcohol (n = 20) and regular cannabis users (n = 21), and controls (n = 20) were included in a mixed factorial study. Alcohol and cannabis users received single doses of alcohol and placebo or cannabis and placebo, respectively. Subjective aggression was assessed before and after aggression exposure consisting of administrations of the point-subtraction aggression paradigm (PSAP) and the single category implicit association test (SC-IAT). Testosterone and cortisol levels in response to alcohol/cannabis treatment and aggression exposure were recorded as secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Subjective aggression significantly increased following aggression exposure in all groups while being sober. Alcohol intoxication increased subjective aggression whereas cannabis decreased the subjective aggression following aggression exposure. Aggressive responses during the PSAP increased following alcohol and decreased following cannabis relative to placebo. Changes in aggressive feeling or response were not correlated to the neuroendocrine response to treatments. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that alcohol facilitates feelings of aggression whereas cannabis diminishes aggressive feelings in heavy alcohol and regular cannabis users, respectively.


Subject(s)
Aggression/psychology , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Alcoholic Intoxication/psychology , Environmental Exposure , Marijuana Smoking/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aggression/drug effects , Cannabis , Case-Control Studies , Central Nervous System Depressants/pharmacology , Ethanol/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult
13.
Sci Rep ; 6: 26843, 2016 05 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27225696

ABSTRACT

Cannabis use history as predictor of neurocognitive response to cannabis intoxication remains subject to scientific and policy debates. The present study assessed the influence of cannabis on neurocognition in cannabis users whose cannabis use history ranged from infrequent to daily use. Drug users (N = 122) received acute doses of cannabis (300 µg/kg THC), cocaine HCl (300 mg) and placebo. Cocaine served as active control for demonstrating neurocognitive test sensitivity. Executive function, impulse control, attention, psychomotor function and subjective intoxication were significantly worse after cannabis administration relative to placebo. Cocaine improved psychomotor function and attention, impaired impulse control and increased feelings of intoxication. Acute effects of cannabis and cocaine on neurocognitive performance were similar across cannabis users irrespective of their cannabis use history. Absence of tolerance implies that that frequent cannabis use and intoxication can be expected to interfere with neurocognitive performance in many daily environments such as school, work or traffic.


Subject(s)
Cognition/drug effects , Dronabinol/adverse effects , Drug Users/psychology , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Attention/drug effects , Cocaine/administration & dosage , Cocaine/adverse effects , Cocaine/pharmacology , Cocaine-Related Disorders/psychology , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Dronabinol/pharmacokinetics , Drug Tolerance , Executive Function/drug effects , Female , Habits , Humans , Impulsive Behavior/drug effects , Male , Marijuana Abuse/psychology , Mental Status and Dementia Tests , Netherlands , Young Adult
14.
Brain Imaging Behav ; 10(4): 1254-1263, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26667034

ABSTRACT

The dopamine ß-hydroxylase (DßH) enzyme transforms dopamine into noradrenaline. We hypothesized that individuals with low activity DBH genotypes (rs1611115 CT/TT) are more sensitive to the influence of cannabis and cocaine on cognitive impulse control and functional connectivity in the limbic 'reward' circuit because they experience a drug induced hyperdopaminergic state compared to individuals with high activity DBH genotypes (rs1611115 CC). Regular drug users (N = 122) received acute doses of cannabis (450 µg/kg THC), cocaine HCl 300 mg and placebo. Cognitive impulse control was assessed by means of the Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT). Resting state fMRI was measured in a subset of participants to determine functional connectivity between the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and (sub)cortical areas. The influence of cannabis and cocaine on impulsivity and functional connectivity significantly interacted with DBH genotype. Both drugs increased cognitive impulsivity in participants with CT/TT genotypes but not in CC participants. Both drugs also reduced functional connectivity between the NAc and the limbic lobe, prefrontal cortex, striatum and thalamus and primarily in individuals with CT/TT genotypes. Correlational analysis indicated a significant negative association between cognitive impulsivity and functional connectivity in subcortical areas of the brain. It is concluded that interference of cannabis and cocaine with cognitive impulse control and functional corticostriatal connectivity depends on DBH genotype. The present data provide a neural substrate and behavioral mechanism by which drug users can progress to drug seeking and may also offer a rationale for targeted pharmacotherapy in chronic drug users with high risk DBH genotypes.


Subject(s)
Brain/drug effects , Cocaine/adverse effects , Dopamine beta-Hydroxylase/genetics , Dronabinol/adverse effects , Impulsive Behavior , Psychotropic Drugs/adverse effects , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/physiopathology , Brain Mapping , Cannabis , Cocaine/administration & dosage , Cocaine/blood , Cocaine/pharmacokinetics , Cocaine-Related Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Cocaine-Related Disorders/genetics , Cocaine-Related Disorders/physiopathology , Cocaine-Related Disorders/psychology , Cognition/drug effects , Cognition/physiology , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Dronabinol/administration & dosage , Dronabinol/blood , Dronabinol/pharmacokinetics , Executive Function/drug effects , Executive Function/physiology , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Marijuana Abuse/diagnostic imaging , Marijuana Abuse/genetics , Marijuana Abuse/physiopathology , Marijuana Abuse/psychology , Neural Pathways/diagnostic imaging , Neural Pathways/drug effects , Neural Pathways/physiopathology , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychotropic Drugs/administration & dosage , Psychotropic Drugs/blood , Psychotropic Drugs/pharmacokinetics , Rest , Young Adult
15.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 25(11): 1914-21, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26328908

ABSTRACT

Chronic or repeated cocaine use has been linked to impairments in social skills. It is not clear whether cocaine is responsible for this impairment or whether other factors, like polydrug use, distort the observed relation. We aimed to investigate this relation by means of a placebo-controlled experimental study. Additionally, associations between stressor-related activity (cortisol, cardiovascular parameters) induced by the biological stressor cocaine, and potential cocaine effects on emotion recognition were studied. Twenty-four healthy recreational cocaine users participated in this placebo-controlled within-subject study. Participants were tested between 1 and 2 h after treatment with oral cocaine (300 mg) or placebo. Emotion recognition of low and high intensity expressions of basic emotions (fear, anger, disgust, sadness, and happiness) was tested. Findings show that cocaine impaired recognition of negative emotions; this was mediated by the intensity of the presented emotions. When high intensity expressions of Anger and Disgust were shown, performance under influence of cocaine 'normalized' to placebo-like levels while it made identification of Sadness more difficult. The normalization of performance was most notable for participants with the largest cortisol responses in the cocaine condition compared to placebo. It was demonstrated that cocaine impairs recognition of negative emotions, depending on the intensity of emotion expression and cortisol response.


Subject(s)
Cocaine-Related Disorders/psychology , Facial Recognition/drug effects , Administration, Oral , Adult , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Cocaine/administration & dosage , Cocaine/pharmacokinetics , Cocaine-Related Disorders/physiopathology , Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Double-Blind Method , Emotions , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Hydrocortisone/blood , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Recognition, Psychology/drug effects , Sleep/drug effects , Testosterone/blood , Young Adult
16.
J Psychopharmacol ; 29(3): 324-34, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25572345

ABSTRACT

Trait impulsivity has been linked to addiction in humans. It has been suggested that drug users with high trait impulsivity levels are more sensitive to subjective drug intoxication. This study assessed whether subjective response to drugs differs between drug users with normal or high levels of trait impulsivity. Regular drug users (N = 122) received doses of cocaine HCl, cannabis, and placebo in a three-way crossover study. Their mood, dissociative state, and psychedelic symptoms were measured with subjective rating scales (CADDS, Bowdle, POMS). Trait impulsivity was assessed with the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Cannabis increased dissociation and psychedelic state, as well as fatigue, confusion, depression and anxiety, and decreased arousal, positive mood, vigor, friendliness, and elation. Cocaine increased dissociation, psychedelic state, vigor, friendliness, elation, positive mood, anxiety and arousal, while decreasing fatigue. Only a few subjective items revealed a drug × trait impulsivity interaction, suggesting that psychedelic symptoms were most intense in high impulsivity subjects. Trait impulsiveness ratings were negatively correlated with ratings of vigor (r = -.197) and positively correlated with ratings of loss of thought control (r = .237) during cannabis intoxication. It is concluded that a broad association between trait impulsivity and psychedelic subjective drug experience appears to be absent.


Subject(s)
Cocaine/pharmacology , Dronabinol/pharmacology , Hallucinogens/pharmacology , Impulsive Behavior/drug effects , Adult , Affect/drug effects , Cannabis/chemistry , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult
17.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 232(2): 343-53, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24998257

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: One of the most often reported cognitive deficits of acute cannabis administration is an impaired recall of previously learned information. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to determine whether cannabis-induced memory impairment in humans is mediated via glutamatergic or cholinergic pathways. METHODS: Fifteen occasional cannabis users participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, six-way cross-over study. On separate test days, subjects received combinations of pretreatment (placebo, vardenafil 20 mg or rivastigmine 3 mg) and treatment (placebo or 1,376 mg cannabis/kg body weight). Cognitive tests were administered immediately after inhalation of treatment was finished and included measures of memory (visual verbal learning task, prospective memory test, Sternberg memory test), perceptual-motor control (critical tracking task), attention (divided attention task) and motor impulsivity (stop signal task). RESULTS: The results of this study demonstrate that subjects under the influence of cannabis were impaired in all memory tasks, in critical tracking, divided attention and the stop signal task. Pretreatment with rivastigmine attenuated the effect of cannabis on delayed recall and showed a trend towards significance on immediate recall. When cannabis was given in combination with vardenafil, there were no significant interaction effects in any of the tasks. CONCLUSIONS: The present data therefore suggest that acetylcholine plays an important role in cannabis-induced memory impairment, whereas similar results for glutamate have not been demonstrated in this study.


Subject(s)
Cannabis , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Marijuana Smoking/adverse effects , Marijuana Smoking/metabolism , Memory Disorders/etiology , Memory Disorders/metabolism , Phenylcarbamates/therapeutic use , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Acetylcholine/metabolism , Adult , Attention/drug effects , Cannabinoids/administration & dosage , Cannabinoids/blood , Cognition/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Glutamic Acid/metabolism , Humans , Male , Marijuana Smoking/drug therapy , Marijuana Smoking/psychology , Memory/drug effects , Memory Disorders/drug therapy , Memory, Short-Term/drug effects , Prospective Studies , Rivastigmine , Sulfones/therapeutic use , Triazines/therapeutic use , Vardenafil Dihydrochloride , Verbal Learning/drug effects , Young Adult
18.
Neuropharmacology ; 87: 198-205, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24667166

ABSTRACT

Previous studies have shown that single doses of MDMA can affect mood and impair memory in humans. The neuropharmacological mechanisms involved in MDMA-induced memory impairment are not clear. Memantine, an NMDA and alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor antagonist, was able to reverse MDMA-induced memory impairment in rats. This study investigated whether treatment with memantine can prevent MDMA-induced memory impairment in humans. 15 subjects participated in a double-blind, placebo controlled, within-subject design. Subjects received both pre-treatment (placebo/memantine 20 mg) (T1) and treatment (placebo/MDMA 75 mg) (T2) on separate test days. T1 preceded T2 by 120 min. Memory function was assessed 90 min after T2 by means of a Visual Verbal Learning Task, a Prospective Memory Task, the Sternberg Memory Task and the Abstract Visual Pattern Learning Task. Profile of Mood State and psychomotor performance were also assessed to control whether MDMA and memantine interactions would selectively pertain to memory or transfer to other domains as well. MDMA significantly impaired performance in the visual verbal learning task and abstract visual pattern learning task. Pre-treatment with memantine did not prevent MDMA-induced memory impairment in these two tasks. Both positive (vigour, arousal, elation) and negative mood effects (anxiety) were increased by MDMA. The responses were not altered by pretreatment with memantine which had no effect on memory or mood when given alone. These preliminary results suggest that memantine does not reverse MDMA-induced memory impairment and mood in humans. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'CNS Stimulants'.


Subject(s)
Affect/drug effects , Central Nervous System Stimulants/toxicity , Memantine/pharmacology , Memory Disorders/chemically induced , N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine/toxicity , Nootropic Agents/pharmacology , Amphetamine-Related Disorders/blood , Amphetamine-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Amphetamine-Related Disorders/psychology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/blood , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Memantine/blood , Memory/drug effects , Memory Disorders/blood , Memory Disorders/prevention & control , N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine/blood , Nootropic Agents/blood , Psychological Tests , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Young Adult
19.
Br J Pharmacol ; 170(7): 1410-20, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24106872

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cannabis is the most popular drug used in the European Union, closely followed by cocaine. Whereas cannabis impairs neurocognitive function in occasional cannabis users, such impairments appear less prominent in heavy users, possibly as a result of tolerance. The present study was designed to assess whether the impairing effects of Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in heavy cannabis users would present in a wide range of neuropsychological functions or selectively affect specific performance domains. We also assessed the acute effects of cocaine on neurocognitive functions of heavy cannabis users. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Heavy cannabis users, who had a history of cocaine use (n = 61), participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study. Subjects received single doses of cocaine HCl (300 mg), cannabis (THC µg·kg(-1) ) and placebo, and completed a number of tests measuring impulse control and psychomotor function. KEY RESULTS: Single doses of cannabis impaired psychomotor function and increased response errors during impulsivity tasks. Single doses of cocaine improved psychomotor function and decreased response time in impulsivity tasks, but increased errors. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Heavy cannabis users display impairments in a broad range of neuropsychological domains during THC intoxication. Impairments observed in psychomotor tasks, but not in impulsivity tasks, appeared smaller in magnitude as compared with those previously reported in occasional cannabis users. Heavy cannabis users were sensitive to the stimulating and inhibitory effects of cocaine on psychomotor function and impulsivity respectively. The reduction in proficiency in impulse control may put drug users at increased risk of repeated drug use and addiction.


Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Stimulants/administration & dosage , Cocaine-Related Disorders/psychology , Cocaine/administration & dosage , Dronabinol/administration & dosage , Hallucinogens/administration & dosage , Impulsive Behavior/psychology , Marijuana Abuse/psychology , Marijuana Smoking/psychology , Administration, Inhalation , Administration, Oral , Adult , Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacokinetics , Cocaine/pharmacokinetics , Cognition/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Dronabinol/pharmacokinetics , Female , Hallucinogens/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Reaction Time/drug effects , Time Factors , Young Adult
20.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 229(2): 219-26, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23604336

ABSTRACT

Release of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) is essential for acute drug reward. The present study was designed to trace the reinforcing effect of dopamine release by measuring the functional connectivity (FC) between the NAcc and brain regions involved in a limbic cortical-subcortical circuit during a dopaminergic challenge. Twenty healthy volunteers received single doses of methylphenidate (40 mg) and placebo on separate test days according to a double-blind, cross-over study design. Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was measured between 1.5 and 2 h postdosing. FC between regions of interest (ROI) in the NAcc, the medial dorsal nucleus (MDN) of the thalamus and remote areas within the limbic circuit was explored. Methylphenidate significantly reduced FC between the NAcc and the basal ganglia (i.e., subthalamic nucleus and ventral pallidum (VP)), relative to placebo. Methylphenidate also decreased FC between the NAcc and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) as well as the temporal cortex. Methylphenidate did not affect FC between MDN and the limbic circuit. It is concluded that methylphenidate directly affects the limbic reward circuit. Drug-induced changes in FC of the NAcc may serve as a useful marker of drug activity in in the brain reward circuit.


Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacology , Methylphenidate/pharmacology , Nucleus Accumbens/drug effects , Reward , Adult , Brain Mapping , Chromatography, Liquid , Double-Blind Method , Female , Functional Laterality , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Mass Spectrometry , Methylphenidate/blood , Nucleus Accumbens/blood supply , Oxygen/blood , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...