Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma.

BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is one of the leading largely preventable causes of blindness in the world. It is usually  addressed first medically with topical intraocular pressure-lowering drops or by laser trabeculoplasty. In cases where such treatment fails, glaucoma-filtering surgery such as trabeculectomy, is commonly considered. Surgeons can differ in their technique when performing trabeculectomy, for example, the choice of the type of the conjunctival flap (fornix- or limbal-based). In a fornix-based flap, the surgical wound is performed at the corneal limbus; while in a limbal-based flap, the incision is further away. Many studies in the literature compare fornix- and limbal-based trabeculectomy with respect to outcomes and complications. OBJECTIVES: To assess the comparative effectiveness of fornix- versus limbal-based conjunctival flaps in trabeculectomy for adult glaucoma, with a specific focus on intraocular pressure (IOP) control and complication rates (adverse effects). SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2021, Issue 3); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; the ISRCTN registry; ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP. The date of the search was 23 March 2021. There were no restrictions to language or year of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs comparing the benefits and complications of fornix- versus limbal-based trabeculectomy for glaucoma, irrespective of glaucoma type, publication status, and language. We excluded studies on children less than 18 years of age, since wound healing is different in this age group and the rate of bleb scarring postoperatively is high. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures as per Cochrane criteria.  MAIN RESULTS: We did not identify any new eligible studies for this review update. As presented in the original review, we included six trials with a total of 361 participants. Two studies were conducted in the USA and one each in Germany, Greece, India, and Saudi Arabia. The participants of four trials had open-angle glaucoma; one study included participants with primary open-angle or primary closed-angle glaucoma, and one study did not specify the type of glaucoma. Three studies used a combined procedure (phacotrabeculectomy). Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC) was performed in four studies, and trabeculectomy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was performed in only one study. None of the included trials reported trabeculectomy failure at 24 months. Only one trial reported the failure rate of trabeculectomy as a late complication. Failure was higher among participants randomised to the limbal-based surgery: 1/50 eyes failed trabeculectomy in the fornix group compared with 3/50 in the limbal group (Peto odds ratio  0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 2.61)); therefore we are very uncertain as to the relative effect of the two procedures on failure rate. Four studies including 252 participants provided measures of mean IOP at 12 months. In the fornix-based surgeries, mean IOP ranged from 12.5 to 15.5 mmHg and similar results were noted in limbal-based surgeries with mean IOP ranging from 11.7 to 15.1 mmHg without significant difference. Mean difference was 0.44 mmHg (95% CI -0.45 to 1.33; 247 eyes) and 0.86 mmHg, (95% CI -0.52 to 2.24; 139 eyes) at 12 and 24 months of follow-up, respectively. Neither of these pooled analyses showed a statistically significant difference in IOP between groups (moderate certainty evidence). One trial reported number of anti-glaucoma medications at 24 months of follow-up with no difference noted between surgical groups. However, three trials reported the mean number of anti-glaucoma medications at 12 months of follow-up without significant difference in the mean number of postoperative IOP-lowering medications between the two surgical techniques. Mean difference was 0.02, (95% CI -0.15 to 0.19) at 12 months of follow-up (high certainty evidence). Because of the small numbers of events and total participants, the risk of many reported adverse events was uncertain and those that were found to be statistically significant may have been due to chance. For risk of bias assessment: although all six trials were randomised selection bias was mostly unclear, with unclear random sequence generation in four of the six studies and unclear allocation concealment in five of the six studies. Attrition bias was encountered in only one trial which also suffered from reporting bias. All other trials had an unclear risk of reporting bias as there was no access to study protocols. All included trials were judged to have high risk of detection bias due to lack of masking of the outcomes. Trabeculectomy is quite a standard procedure and unlikely to induce bias due to surgeon 'performance', hence performance bias was not evaluated. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The main result of this review was that there was uncertainty as to the difference between fornix- and limbal-based trabeculectomy surgeries due to the small number of events and confidence intervals that cross the null. This also applied to postoperative complications, but without any impact on long-term failure rate between the two surgical techniques.

A Comparison of Retrobulbar Versus Topical Anesthesia in Trabeculectomy and Aqueous Shunt Surgery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the required supplemental anesthesia and postoperative patient pain score in individuals undergoing glaucoma surgery under topical anesthesia (TA) versus retrobulbar anesthesia (RB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, interventional, comparative cohort study of 261 eyes of 225 patients undergoing glaucoma and combined glaucoma with cataract surgery were included in the study. The main outcome measures were the amount of supplemental, systemic intraoperative anesthesia used and the postoperative pain scale between patients undergoing TA versus RB anesthesia. A secondary analysis was performed between combined glaucoma and cataract surgery versus glaucoma surgery alone. RESULTS: About 6.2% patients complained of pain after glaucoma surgery (8.1% among TA group and 3.1% among RB group; P=0.049). Overall, pain tended to be mild with a mean score of 0.32 of 10 for TA and 0.08 of 10 for RB (P=0.027). The amount of IV anesthetics used intraoperatively was lower in the RB anesthesia compared with the TA group (midazolam, P=0.042; fentanyl, P<0.001; propofol, P<0.001). In addition, patients undergoing RB anesthesia were less likely to use postoperative pain medication (P<0.001). There was no difference in pain score (P=0.707) or in the amount of IV anesthetics (all P>0.350) between eyes undergoing combined versus glaucoma surgery alone. CONCLUSIONS: Although supplemental anesthesia and pain scores were statistically increased in the topical group, the prevalence and the severity of pain was low. Therefore, TA is feasible and a reasonable option for glaucoma surgery. Furthermore, this conclusion applies when glaucoma surgery is performed alone or in combination with the other eye surgery.

Technology and the Glaucoma Suspect.

PURPOSE: To determine and compare the diagnostic performance of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), stereoscopic disc photographs, and automated perimetry as assessed by a group of glaucoma specialists in differentiating individuals with early glaucoma from suspects. METHODS: Forty-six eyes (46 patients) with suspicious optic nerves had previously undergone SD-OCT scans, 24-2 visual fields (VFs), and optic disc photographs. The average VF mean deviation was -1.97 ± 2.09 (SD) dB. Four glaucoma specialists examined the 138 individual diagnostic tests and classified the patient as likely glaucomatous or nonglaucomatous based on the results of a single test. The diagnostic performances of each of the three tests were compared to a previously determined reference standard, based on the consensus of a separate panel of four glaucoma specialists who examined all three tests together. RESULTS: Among the four specialists, the interobserver agreement across the three diagnostic tests was poor for VF and photos, with kappa (κ) values of 0.13 and 0.16, respectively, and moderate for OCT, with κ value of 0.40. Using panel consensus as reference standard, OCT had the highest discriminative ability, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99 (95% 0.96-1.0) compared to photograph AUC 0.85 (95% 0.73-0.96) and VF AUC 0.86 (95% 0.76-0.96), suggestive of closer performance to that of a group of glaucoma specialists. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to VF and disc photography, SD-OCT, when used alone, had better internal agreement as well as better agreement with the consensus of clinicians using all available data. Future studies should evaluate best practices for SD-OCT interpretation.

Retained subretinal perfluorocarbon liquid in microincision 23-gauge versus traditional 20-gauge vitrectomy for retinal detachment repair.

PURPOSE: To assess the rate of retained subretinal perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) in patients undergoing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair with sutureless 23-gauge vitrectomy versus traditional 20-gauge vitrectomy. METHODS: A retrospective, consecutive, interventional comparative case series. All patients with a diagnosis of RRD who underwent pars plana vitrectomy with PFCL for RRD repair from November 1, 2005 through October 31, 2008 were included. RESULTS: A total of 234 RRD repairs were performed during the study period by one surgeon. Subretinal PFCL occurred in 4 of 176 eyes (2.3%) who underwent sutured 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy and in 6 of 58 eyes (10.3%) who underwent sutureless 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachment (P = 0.0167, Fisher exact test, 2-tailed). CONCLUSION: There is a statistically significant 4.5-fold increased incidence of retained subretinal PFCL in patients undergoing RRD repair with sutureless 23-gauge vitrectomy versus traditional 20-gauge vitrectomy. This may be because of higher fluid flow through open 23-gauge cannulas, which causes disruption of the PFCL surface tension resulting in formation of small PFCL bubbles that can enter the subretinal space. Reduction of fluid flow may help prevent this complication.