Barriers and Promotors to Health Service Utilization for Pelvic Floor Disorders in the United States: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies.

IMPORTANCE: We need a systematic approach to understanding health service utilization behavior in women with pelvic floor symptoms in the United States. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of pelvic floor care utilization and identify its barriers and promotors using Andersen's model, which theorizes care-seeking behavior with individual care needs, resources, predispositions, and macrostructures. DESIGN: This was a systematic search of studies on care-seeking patterns in women with symptomatic pelvic floor disorders, which included pelvic organ prolapse, lower urinary tract symptoms, and anal incontinence. We then performed meta-analyses with random-effects models and descriptive analysis to determine utilization rate and the impact of each identified determinant. RESULTS: The pooled utilization rate was 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30%-45%). Determinants were identified across all domains except at the macrostructure level. For individual care needs, increased symptom severity or duration and a history of depression (odds ratio [OR], 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07-1.51) were associated with higher utilization. In the resources domain, having social support and established primary/secondary care were promotors, whereas higher income and employed status trended as barriers. Under predispositions, age ≥50 years (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05-1.60), and pelvic floor awareness were associated with utilization, whereas Asian (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.51-0.72) and Black (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.55-1.08) women as well as women experiencing fear, misinformation, or normalization of pelvic floor disorders had decreased utilization. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified a low utilization rate for pelvic floor care and revealed multilayered, actionable items affecting care-seeking behavior. It highlights the need for more inclusive and multifaceted approaches in future pelvic floor disparity research and equity interventions.

Age, parity, and prolapse: interaction and influence on levator bowl volume.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to test the hypotheses that a linear relationship exists between age and levator bowl volume (LBV); and that age, parity, and prolapse are independently associated with LBV. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from nulliparous women, parous controls, and prolapse (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) Ba ≥ 1 cm) cases from each of three age groups: young (≤40), mid-age (50-60), and older (≥70). LBV was measured using MRI at rest and Valsalva as the 3D space contained above the levator ani muscles and below the sacrococcygeal junction-to-inferior pubic point reference plane. Linear regression models were used to examine the effects of age, parity, prolapse, and their interactions (age*parity and age*prolapse) on LBV. RESULTS: Each group consisted of 9-12 women. LBVRest increased with age in a nonlinear fashion. For nulliparous women, the median value increased 4.7% per decade from the young to mid-age group and 84% per decade from the mid-age to older group; for parous controls, the corresponding increases were 38% and -0.5%; and for women with prolapse, they were 46% and 11%. Age and prolapse status (both p<0.001) were found to be significant independent predictors of LBVRest. Interactions between age*prolapse (p=0.003) and age*parity (p=0.045) were also independently associated with LBVRest. CONCLUSIONS: Parity and prolapse influence how age affects LBVRest. In nulliparous women, age had little effect on LBVRest until after mid-age. For women with prolapse, LBVRest increased at a much earlier age, with the biggest difference occurring between young and mid-age women.

Changes in cardinal ligament length and curvature with parity and prolapse and their relation to level III hiatus measures.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Test the hypotheses that (1) cardinal ligament (CL) straightening and lengthening occur with parity and prolapse, (2) CL straightening occurs before lengthening, and (3) CL length is correlated with level III measures. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of MRIs from women in three groups: (1) nulliparous with normal support, (2) parous with normal support, and (3) uterine prolapse (POP-Q point C > - 4 and Ba > 1 cm). The 3D stress MRI images at rest and maximal Valsalva were analyzed. CLs were traced from their origin to cervico-vaginal insertions. Curvature ratio was calculated as curved length/straight length. Level III measures included urogenital hiatus (UGH), levator hiatus (LH), and levator bowl volume (LBV), and their correlations with CL length were calculated. RESULTS: Ten women were included in each group. Compared to the nulliparous group, CL length was 18% longer in parous controls (p = .04) and 59% longer with prolapse (p < .01) at rest, while at Valsalva, CL length was 10% longer in parous controls (p = .21) and 49% longer with prolapse (p < .01). Curvature ratios showed 18% more straightening in women with prolapse compared to parous controls (p < .01). Curved CL length and level III measures were moderately to strongly correlated: UGH (rest: R = 0.68, p < .01; Valsalva: R =0.80, p < .01), LH (rest: R = 0.60, p < .01; Valsalva: R = 0.78, p < .01), and LBV (rest: R = 0.71, p < .01; Valsalva: R =0.89, p < .01). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the CLs undergo three times as much lengthening with prolapse as with parity; however, straightening only occurs with prolapse. Strong correlations exist between level I and level III support.