Integrated Short-Term and Long-Term Efficacy of Topical Clascoterone Cream 1% in Patients Aged 12 Years or Older With Acne Vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: Clascoterone cream 1% is approved for the treatment of acne vulgaris in patients aged 12 years or older based on results from two identical pivotal Phase 3 trials. Integrated efficacy of clascoterone in patients aged 12 years or older with acne vulgaris from the pivotal trials (NCT02608450 and NCT02608476) and long-term extension (LTE) study (NCT02682264) is reported. METHODS: In the pivotal trials, patients with moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris were randomized 1:1 to twice-daily application of clascoterone cream 1% or vehicle for 12 weeks; they could then enter the LTE study, where all patients applied clascoterone to the face and, if desired, trunk for up to 9 additional months. Efficacy was assessed from treatment success based on Investigator's Global Assessment scores (IGA 0/1) in patients aged 12 years or older in the intention-to-treat population; lesion counts were assessed through week 12. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation in the pivotal studies and were not imputed in the LTE study. RESULTS: Of 1421 patients enrolled, 1143 (clascoterone, 576; vehicle, 567) completed week 12; 600 entered and 343 completed the LTE study. The treatment success rate and most lesion count reductions following clascoterone vs placebo treatment reached statistical significance at week 12; the overall treatment success rate increased to 30.2% for facial acne after 12 months and 31.7% for truncal acne after 9 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of clascoterone cream 1% for the treatment of acne vulgaris continued to increase over time for up to 12 months in patients aged 12 years or older with acne vulgaris.   J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(1):1278-1283.     doi:10.36849/JDD.7719.

Evaluation of DermSat-7 for Assessing Treatment Satisfaction in Patients with Acne.

Importance: Treatment satisfaction is important to achieving therapeutic success in patients with inflammatory dermatological diseases, such as acne. Objective: To evaluate the structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity of the DermSat-7, a questionnaire-based measure of treatment satisfaction, in patients with acne seen in routine clinical practice. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included adults with acne who were fluent in English and treated at an outpatient clinic at Brigham and Women's Hospital between July 2022 and May 2023. At each visit, patients completed a self-administered, patient-reported outcome questionnaire, including a patient global assessment (PGA) of their acne severity and the DermSat-7. The DermSat-7 consists of 7 items assessing 3 domains of treatment: effectiveness (3 items), convenience (3 items), and overall satisfaction (1 item). At subsequent visits, patients were asked an anchor item related to change in disease severity ("How has your acne changed compared to your last visit?") that was scored on a 7-point scale (-3 = much worse to 3 = much better). Also at each visit, a dermatologist completed the Comprehensive Acne Severity Scale (CASS). Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were structural validity (assessed by factor analysis), internal consistency (assessed by Cronbach α), and construct validity (assessed using linear regression models and Pearson correlation coefficients). Results: The analysis included 142 patients with acne (mean [SD] age, 25.1 [5.1] years; 96 females [67.6%]) taking acne medication who completed the DermSat-7. Exploratory factor and confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensionality of the 3 DermSat-7 domains. Cronbach α values of 0.89 and 0.80 supported good internal consistency in the effectiveness and convenience domains, respectively. Known-groups validity was supported by increasing DermSat-7 effectiveness and overall satisfaction scores with increasing levels of positive change in disease severity (linear regression coefficient, 7.51; 95% CI, 4.94-10.08; P < .001). Construct validity was further supported by moderate correlations with the anchor, PGA, and CASS scores (effectiveness domain: anchor r = 0.567, PGA r = -0.538, and CASS r = -0.485; overall satisfaction domain: anchor r = 0.467, PGA r = -0.486, and CASS r = -0.489). Conclusion and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that the DermSat-7 may be an effective tool for measuring treatment satisfaction, particularly effectiveness and overall satisfaction domains, among patients with acne. Further research is needed to examine additional measurement properties of the DermSat-7, such as content validity and interpretability, as well as to validate the DermSat-7 in other populations of patients with acne.

International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) - Report from the 2022 Annual Meeting.

BACKGROUND: The International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) is a non-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of evidence-based, consensus-driven outcome measures in dermatological diseases. Researchers and stakeholders from various backgrounds collaborate to develop these objective benchmark metrics to further advance treatment and management of dermatological conditions. SUMMARY: The 2022 IDEOM Annual Meeting was held on June 17-18, 2022. Leaders and stakeholders from the hidradenitis suppurativa, acne, vitiligo, actinic keratosis, alopecia areata, itch, cutaneous lymphoma, and psoriatic disease workgroups discussed the progress of their respective outcome-measures research. This report summarizes each workgroup's updates from 2022 and their next steps as established during the 2022 IDEOM Annual Meeting. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(12):1153-1159 doi:10.36849/JDD.7615.

Is There a Clinically Relevant Risk of Hyperkalemia with Topical Clascoterone Treatment?

Clascoterone cream 1% is an androgen receptor inhibitor approved for the treatment of acne vulgaris in patients aged 12 years or older with clinical studies completed in subjects aged nine years or older. Blood potassium levels above the upper limit of normal (i.e., hyperkalemia) were reported in both clascoterone-treated and vehicle-treated patients; reported rates of hyperkalemia were approximately five percent and four percent, respectively. None of the cases of hyperkalemia were reported as adverse events and none led to study discontinuation or adverse clinical sequelae. An exposure-response analysis showed no correlation between plasma concentrations of clascoterone or its metabolite cortexolone and cases of hyperkalemia. Based on the laboratory safety profile of clascoterone demonstrated in the Phase I and Phase II studies, baseline or subsequent laboratory monitoring was not required in the Phase III studies or recommended in the FDA-approved prescribing information. The frequency of shifts to elevated potassium levels was highest in patients younger than 12 years of age treated with clascoterone, for whom clascoterone 1% is not FDA approved.

Treatment response to isotretinoin correlates with specific shifts in Cutibacterium acnes strain composition within the follicular microbiome.

There are no drugs as effective as isotretinoin for acne. Deciphering the changes in the microbiome induced by isotretinoin in the pilosebaceous follicle of successfully treated patients can pave the way to identify novel therapeutic alternatives. We determined how the follicular microbiome changes with isotretinoin and identified which alterations correlate with a successful treatment response. Whole genome sequencing was done on casts from facial follicles of acne patients sampled before, during and after isotretinoin treatment. Alterations in the microbiome were assessed and correlated with treatment response at 20 weeks as defined as a 2-grade improvement in global assessment score. We investigated the α-diversity, ß-diversity, relative abundance of individual taxa, Cutibacterium acnes strain composition and bacterial metabolic profiles with a computational approach. We found that increased ß-diversity of the microbiome coincides with a successful treatment response to isotretinoin at 20 weeks. Isotretinoin selectively altered C. acnes strain diversity in SLST A and D clusters, with increased diversity in D1 strains correlating with a successful clinical response. Isotretinoin significantly decreased the prevalence of KEGG Ontology (KO) terms associated with four distinct metabolic pathways inferring that follicular microbes may have limited capacity for growth or survival following treatment. Importantly, these alterations in microbial composition or metabolic profiles were not observed in patients that failed to achieve a successful response at 20 weeks. Alternative approaches to recapitulate this shift in the balance of C. acnes strains and microbiome metabolic function within the follicle may be beneficial in the future treatment of acne.

Efficacy and Safety of 1% Clascoterone Cream in Patients Aged > 12 Years With Acne Vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: Two randomized phase 3 studies evaluated efficacy and safety of 1% clascoterone cream, a topical androgen receptor inhibitor, in patients aged ≥9 years with moderate-to-severe facial acne vulgaris after 12 weeks of treatment. OBJECTIVES: To present a pooled data analysis of the efficacy and safety of 1% clascoterone cream after 12 weeks of treatment in patients aged ≥12 years from the 2 phase 3 trials. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to twice-daily treatment of the whole face with clascoterone or vehicle. Primary efficacy outcomes were proportion of patients achieving treatment success (Investigator Global Assessment score of "clear" [0] or "almost clear" [1] with ≥2-point reduction from baseline) and absolute change from baseline (CFB) in noninflammatory lesion count and inflammatory lesion count; secondary efficacy outcomes included absolute CFB in total lesion count at week 12. Safety was assessed from treatment-emergent adverse events and local skin reactions. RESULTS: 709/712 patients age ≥12 years were treated with clascoterone/vehicle. After 12 weeks, clascoterone was efficacious compared with vehicle, based on proportion of patients achieving treatment success (19.9% vs 7.7%) and CFB in noninflammatory lesion count (-20.8 vs -11.9), inflammatory lesion count (-19.7 vs -14.0), and total lesion count (-40.0 vs -26.1; all P<0.0001). Frequencies of local skin reactions were low and similar between treatment arms, with no new safety signals. CONCLUSIONS: Clascoterone is efficacious, with a favorable safety profile and low rates of local skin reactions in patients ≥12 years of age with facial acne vulgaris. (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02608450 and NCT02608476) J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(2): doi:10.36849/JDD.7000.

Anti-IL-17A blockade did not significantly reduce inflammatory lesions in a placebo-controlled pilot study in adult patients with moderate to severe acne.

BACKGROUND: CJM112 is a potent anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody, whose clinical efficacy in psoriasis was recently documented. This study aimed to assess the effect of IL-17A blockade, using CJM112, in patients with moderate to severe acne. METHODS: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, proof-of-concept study was conducted on patients with moderate to severe acne. Patients received CJM112 300 mg, 75 mg, or placebo subcutaneously during Treatment Period 1 (0-12 weeks). Patients receiving placebo were re-randomized to receive CJM112 300 mg or 75 mg during Treatment Period 2 (12-24 weeks). The primary endpoint was the number of inflammatory facial lesions at Week 12. RESULTS: As the futility criterion was met during the interim analysis, only 52/75 (69.3%) patients were recruited. In total, 48/52 (92.3%) and 26/41 (63.4%) completed Treatment Periods 1 and 2, respectively. All groups exhibited a reduction in facial inflammatory lesions, with no difference observed between CJM112 and placebo (CJM112 300 mg 27.6 ± 20.7; CJM112 75 mg 30.4 ± 34.8; placebo 23.6 ± 13.6; primary endpoint). Additionally, no differences were observed between groups in other secondary and exploratory endpoints at Week 12. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-IL-17A therapy was not significantly different compared to the placebo in reducing inflammatory lesions in patients with moderate to severe acne.

Isotretinoin Laboratory Monitoring in Acne Treatment: A Delphi Consensus Study.

Importance: Although isotretinoin may rarely be associated with laboratory abnormalities such as hypertriglyceridemia, the optimal approach to laboratory monitoring is uncertain, and there is wide variation in clinical practice. Objective: To establish a consensus for isotretinoin laboratory monitoring among a diverse, international cohort of clinical and research experts in acne. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using a modified electronic Delphi process, 4 rounds of anonymous electronic surveys were administered from 2021 to 2022. For laboratory tests reaching consensus (≥70% agreement) for inclusion, questions regarding more time-specific monitoring throughout isotretinoin therapy were asked in subsequent rounds. The participants were international board-certified dermatologist acne experts who were selected on a voluntary basis based on involvement in acne-related professional organizations and research. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measured was whether participants could reach consensus on key isotretinoin laboratory monitoring parameters. Results: The 22 participants from 5 continents had a mean (SD) time in practice of 23.7 (11.6) years and represented a variety of practice settings. Throughout the 4-round study, participation rates ranged from 90% to 100%. Consensus was achieved for the following: check alanine aminotransferase within a month prior to initiation (89.5%) and at peak dose (89.5%) but not monthly (76.2%) or after treatment completion (73.7%); check triglycerides within a month prior to initiation (89.5%) and at peak dose (78.9%) but not monthly (84.2%) or after treatment completion (73.7%); do not check complete blood cell count or basic metabolic panel parameters at any point during isotretinoin treatment (all >70%); do not check gamma-glutamyl transferase (78.9%), bilirubin (81.0%), albumin (72.7%), total protein (72.7%), low-density lipoprotein (73.7%), high-density lipoprotein (73.7%), or C-reactive protein (77.3%). Conclusions and Relevance: This Delphi study identified a core set of laboratory tests that should be evaluated prior to and during treatment with isotretinoin. These results provide valuable data to guide clinical practice and clinical guideline development to optimize laboratory monitoring in patients treated with isotretinoin.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review of Measure Development and Measurement Properties.

Importance: Multiple patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for health-related quality of life (HRQoL) exist for patients with acne. However, little is known about the content validity and other measurement properties of these PROMs. Objective: To systematically review PROMs for HRQoL in adults or adolescents with acne. Data Sources: Eligible studies were extracted from PubMed and Embase (OVID). Study Selection: Full-text articles published in English or Spanish on development, pilot, or validation studies for acne-specific, dermatology-specific, or generic HRQoL PROMs were included. Development studies included original development studies, even if not studied in acne patients per Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) recommendations. If a study included several diagnoses, the majority (ie, over 50%) of patients must have acne or acne-specific subgroup analyses must be available. Abstract and full-text screening was performed by 2 independent reviewers. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two independent reviewers assessed study quality applying the COSMIN checklist and extracted and analyzed the data. For each distinctive PROM, quality of evidence was graded by measurement property. Main Outcomes and Measures: PROM properties (target population, domains, recall period, development language), PROM development and pilot studies, content validity (relevance, comprehensiveness, comprehensibility), and remaining measurement properties (structural validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, reliability, measurement error, criterion validity, construct validity, and responsiveness). Quality of evidence was assigned for each measurement property of included PROMs. An overall recommendation level was assigned based on content validity and quality of the evidence of measurement properties. Results: We identified 54 acne PROM development or validation studies for 10 acne-specific PROMs, 6 dermatology-specific PROMs, and 5 generic PROMs. Few PROMs had studies for responsiveness. The only acne-specific PROMs with sufficient evidence for content validity were the CompAQ and Acne-Q. Based on available evidence, the Acne-Q and CompAQ can be recommended for use in acne clinical studies. Conclusions and Relevance: Two PROMs can currently be recommended for use in acne clinical studies: the Acne-Q and CompAQ. Evidence on content validity and other measurement properties were lacking for all PROMs; further research investigating the quality of remaining acne-specific, dermatology-specific, and generic HRQoL PROMs is required to recommend their use.

Gaps and recommendations for clinical management of truncal acne from the Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts panel.

BACKGROUND: Truncal acne is common and burdensome for patients; however, there is paucity of evidence and guidance for the management of truncal acne. Currently, clinical practice guidelines provide very little guidance on the assessment or management of truncal acne. OBJECTIVES: To identify unmet needs in truncal acne and make recommendations to address clinical and management gaps using an international consensus. METHODS: The Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts panel consisted of 13 dermatologists, who used a modified Delphi approach to reach a consensus on statements related to clinically relevant aspects of truncal acne evaluation and management. A consensus was defined as ≥75% of the panelists voting "agree" or "strongly agree." The voting was electronic and blinded. RESULTS: The panel identified gaps and made recommendations related to truncal acne identification, assessment, and grading; the evaluation of the impact on patients; and treatment goals and factors to be considered for its management. LIMITATIONS: The recommendations are based on expert opinion, in the absence of high-quality evidence. CONCLUSIONS: We highlighted addressing not just facial acne but also truncal acne during patient consultations. The recommendations made herein may help facilitate the care of patients who present with truncal acne, with or without facial acne.

Identifying gaps and providing recommendations to address shortcomings in the investigation of acne sequelae by the Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts panel.

BACKGROUND: The physical sequelae of acne include erythema, hyperpigmentation, and scarring, which are highly burdensome for patients. Early, effective treatment can potentially limit and prevent sequelae development, but there is a need for guidance for and evidence of prevention-oriented management to improve patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To identify unmet needs of acne sequelae and generate expert recommendations to address gaps in clinical guidance. METHODS: The Personalizing Acne: Consensus of Experts panel of 13 dermatologists used a modified Delphi approach to achieve a consensus on the clinical aspects of acne sequelae. A consensus was defined as ≥75% of the dermatologists voting "agree" or "strongly agree." All voting was electronic and blinded. RESULTS: The panel identified gaps in current guidance and made recommendations related to acne sequelae. These included identification and classification of sequelae, pertinent points to consider for patient consultations, and management aimed at reducing the development of sequelae. LIMITATIONS: The recommendations are based on expert opinion and made in the absence of high-quality evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The identified gaps should help inform future research and guideline development for acne sequelae. The consensus-based recommendations should also support the process of consultations throughout the patient journey, helping to reduce the development and burden of acne sequelae through improved risk factor recognition, early discussion, and appropriate management.

The Personalised Acne Care Pathway-Recommendations to guide longitudinal management from the Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts.

BACKGROUND: Acne is a chronic disease with a varying presentation that requires long-term management. Despite this, the clinical guidelines for acne offer limited guidance to facilitate personalized or longitudinal management of patients. OBJECTIVES: To generate recommendations to support comprehensive, personalized, long-term patient management that address all presentations of acne and its current and potential future burden. METHODS: The Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts panel consisted of 13 dermatologists who used a modified Delphi approach to reach consensus on statements related to longitudinal acne management. The consensus was defined as ≥75% voting "agree" or "strongly agree." All voting was electronic and blinded. RESULTS: Key management domains, consisting of distinct considerations, points to discuss with patients, and "pivot points" were identified and incorporated into the Personalised Acne Care Pathway. Long-term treatment goals and expectations and risk of (or fears about) sequelae are highlighted as particularly important to discuss frequently with patients. LIMITATIONS: Recommendations are based on expert opinion, which could potentially differ from patients' perspectives. Regional variations in health care systems may not have been captured. CONCLUSIONS: The Personalised Acne Care Pathway provides practical recommendations to facilitate the longitudinal management of acne, which can be used by health care professionals to optimize and personalize care throughout the patient journey.

Parametric Acne Severity (PAS) Score and Lesion Counts From Multi-Modality Facial Image Analysis Correlates Strongly with Investigator Assessment.

Variability in acne lesion counting and assessing global severity necessitates large sample sizes that increase trial costs. Lack of standardized measures for these outcomes precludes the conduct of meta-analyses needed to compare efficacy of acne treatments. The goal of this study was to evaluate objective measures of lesion counts and global severity using analysis of multimodal photography. An algorithm for counting lesions was trained and validated in 30 acne subjects and compared to parallel assessments by 2 expert raters. A composite of photographic data representative of acne lesion topography, erythema, and C Acnes fluorescence was used to generate a Parametric Acne Severity (PAS) score. No relationship was identified between lesion counts and IGA. The correlation coefficients between raters and the algorithm when compared per view for the inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts were 0.77 (P=0.001) and 0.85 (P=0.001), respectively. The correlation coefficient between the raters’ IGA grades and the PAS score was 0.82 (P<0.05). These data demonstrate that the lesion counting, and PAS are objective measures that strongly correlate with investigator assessments. Inclusion of these measure in clinical trials may reduce variability, standardize outcomes, and provide insights into treatment effects on photographic parameters associated with acne. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(6):642-647. doi:10.36849/JDD.6165.