Affinity chromatography with the immobilized agonist N-0434 yields an active and highly purified preparation of the dopamine D-2 receptor from bovine striatum.

Partial purification of the dopamine D-2 receptor from bovine striatum, solubilized in the presence of 1% digitonin, was obtained by chromatography on wheat germ lectin agarose. The preparation was purified approximately 10-fold. The stability of the receptor preparation was considerably improved and non-specific protein absorption on the affinity gel used later was decreased. Further purification was achieved on a column containing a D-2-selective agonist, N-0434. Approximately 90% of the receptor activity was bound to the gel and 20-40% of the activity could be eluted by pH shock. The total purification factor after one affinity chromatography step was estimated to be at least 1500. An active preparation of at least 20% purity was obtained after a second cycle of affinity chromatography. This corresponds to an enrichment of more than 5000 times compared to the solubilized receptor preparation.

Localization of virginiamycin S binding site on bacterial ribosome by fluorescence energy transfer.

Virginiamycin S, a type B synergimycin inhibiting protein synthesis in bacteria, competes with erythromycin for binding to the 50S ribosomal subunits; the mechanism of action of the two antibiotics is unclear. Energy-transfer experiments between virginiamycin S (which is endowed with inherent fluorescence due to its hydroxypicolinyl moiety) and fluorescent coumarinyl derivatives of ribosomal proteins L7 and L10 have been carried out to locate the binding site of this antibiotic on the ribosome. Previous studies have indicated that two L7/L12 dimers can attach respectively to a strong binding site located on the central protuberance and to a weak binding site located on the stalk of the 50S subunits and that protein L10 is located at the base of the stalk. The distance between ribosome-bound virginiamycin S and a fluorophore located at the strong binding site of proteins L7/L12 (Lys-51 of L7) was found to be 56 (+/- 15) A. Virginiamycin S, on the other hand, was located at a distance exceeding 67 A from the weak binding site of L7/L12 dimers. A fluorophore positioned on the unique cysteine (Cys-70) of protein L10 and ribosome-bound virginiamycin S proved to be more than 60 A apart. From data available on the location of proteins L7/L12 and L10, a model is proposed, whereby the virginiamycin S binding site is placed at the base of the central protuberance of the 50S subunits, in proximity of the presumptive peptidyl transferase center. The binding sites of macrolides and lincosamides (related antibiotics of the MLS group) are expected to be very close to that of virginiamycin S.

Quantum efficiency and antenna size of photosystems II alpha, II beta and I in tobacco chloroplasts.

Reaction center concentrations were determined in chloroplasts of tobacco, cv John William's Broadleaf, and its mutants Su/su and Su/su var. Aurea. Quantum yields of the primary reactions of Photosystems I, II alpha and II beta (Melis, A. and Homann, P.H. (1975) Photochem. Photobiol. 21, 431--437) were obtained by measurement of their rate constants and the absorbed energy, under conditions where all three photosystems operated simultaneously and produced almost irreversibly a single charge separation. The concentrations and reaction rates of the photosystems were different in chloroplasts from the wild type and the mutants, but in chloroplasts of each type of plant used essentially all quanta absorbed by chlorophyll caused a charge separation in PS I, PS II alpha or PS II beta. since the quantum efficiency of each photosystem was close to one, kinetic differences between the photosystems and between different kinds of chloroplasts were only due to differences in antenna size. From the rate constants the number of chlorophyll molecules in the antenna of each photosystem could be calculated. It is argued that PS II alpha and PS II beta must be different, independent structures.

Chlorophyll composition of photosystems II alpha, II beta and I in tobacco chloroplasts.

The antenna composition of the Photosystems II alpha, II beta and I was studied in tobacco chloroplasts. Absorbance spectra, recorded at 4 K, were analyzed for the wild type and the mutants Su/su and Su/su var. Aurea, containing higher concentrations of the photosystems. With chloroplasts of Su/su we measured the action spectra of the three photosystems from 625 to 690 nm. Above 675 nm absorption by Photosystem I dominated. This system had a maximum at 678 nm and a shoulder at 660 nm. Of the long-wavelength chlorophyll a forms, absorbing at 690, 697 and 705 nm at 4 K, which are generally assigned to Photosystem I, the 697 nm form occurred in an amount of four molecules per reaction center of Photosystem I in each type of chloroplast. The Photosystem II alpha spectrum was characterized by maxima at 650 and 672 nm, showing clearly the participation of the chlorophyll a and b containing light-harvesting complex. In the mutants the light-harvesting complex has a chlorophyll a to chlorophyll b ratio of more than 1; the amount of the 672 nm chlorophyll a was normal, whereas the amount of chlorophyll b was markedly decreased in the mutants relative to the wild type. The Photosystem II beta spectrum mainly consisted of a band at 683 nm.

The relative absorption cross-sections of photosystem I and photosystem II in chloroplasts from three types of Nicotiana tabacum.

In the present study we used three types of Nicotiana tabacum, cv John William's Broad Leaf (the wild type and two mutants, the yellow-green Su/su and the yellow Su/su var. Aurea) in order to correlat functional properties of Photosystem II and Photosystem I with the structural organization of their chloroplasts. The effective absorption cross-section of Photosystem II and Photosystem I centers was measured by means of the rate constant of their photoconversion under light-limiting conditions. In agreement with earlier results (Okabe, K., Schmid, G.H. and Straub, J. (1977) Plant Physiol. 60, 150--156) the photosynthetic unit size for both System II and System I in the two mutants was considerably smaller as compared to the wild type. We observed biphasic kinetics in the photoconversion of System II in all three types of N. tabacum. However, the photoconversion of System I occurred with monophasic and exponential kinetics. Under our experimental conditions, the effective cross-section of Photosystem I was comparable to that of the fast System II component (alpha centers). The relative amplitude of the slow System II component (beta centers) varied between 30% in the wild type to 70% in the Su/su var. Aurea mutant. The increased fraction of beta centers is correlated with the decreased fraction of appressed photosynthetic membranes in the chloroplasts of the two mutants. As a working hypothesis, it is suggested that beta centers are located on photosynthetic membranes directly exposed to the stroma medium.

Fluorescence emission spectra of chloroplasts and subchloroplast preparations at low temperature.

A study was made of the chlorophyll fluorescence spectra between 100 and 4.2 K of chloroplasts of various species of higher plants (wild strains and chlorophyll b mutants) and of subchloroplast particles enriched in Photosystem I or II. The chloroplast spectra showed the well known emission bands at about 685, 695 and 715--740 nm; the System I and II particles showed bands at about 675, 695 and 720 nm and near 685 nm, respectively. The effect of temperature lowering was similar for chloroplasts and subchloroplast particles; for the long wave bands an increase in intensity occurred mainly between 100 and 50 K, whereas the bands near 685 nm showed a considerable increase in the region of 50--4.2 K. In addition to this we observed an emission band near 680 nm in chloroplasts, the amplitude of which was less dependent on temperature. The band was missing in barley mutant no. 2, which lacks the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-protein complex. At 4.7 K the spectra of the variable fluorescence (Fv) consisted mainly of the emission bands near 685 and 695 nm, and showed only little far-red emission and no contribution of the band at 680 nm. From these and other data it is concluded that the emission at 680 nm is due to the light-harvesting complex, and that the bands at 685 and 695 nm are emitted by the System II pigment-protein complex. At 4.2 K, energy transfer from System II to the light-harvesting complex is blocked, but not from the light-harvesting to the System I and System II complexes. The fluorescence yield of the chlorophyll species emitting at 685 nm appears to be directly modulated by the trapping state of the reaction center.