Tibial implant design in primary TKA: retrospective comparison of two designs for the occurrence of radiolucent lines and aseptic loosening.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this retrospective study was to study the effect of tibial implant design on the occurrence of radiolucent lines (RLLs) and aseptic loosening (AL) by comparing two different total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two types of total knee arthroplasty, different for tibial shape, size and keel design were compared, 255 for the first and 774 for the second. The occurrence of RLLs and radiological signs of micro- and macro-mobility and aseptic loosening was analyzed. Demographic data were compared, as well as the type and rate of RLLs, occurrence of aseptic loosening and the presence of potential risk factors. RESULTS: The first implant design is morphometric and has a squarer keel than the second implant TKA. The overall rate of RLLs was similar (21% vs 23%), despite of a significantly lower rates of radiological signs of macro-mobility of the tibial component with the first implant (2% vs 17%). Survivorship of both designs was overall comparable (99.6% vs 98.8 %) the first implant group had more potential risk factors for poor bone quality than the second group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A morphometric design is more anatomic and offers better bone coverage of the epiphyseal tibial surface. RLLs, as a sign of implant micro-mobility, were equally present in both designs. Radiological signs of macro-mobility at the metaphysis were less frequently observed in squared keel design. The morphometric implant did not show improved survivorship compared with a symmetric implant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Appearance and evolution of radiolucent lines below the tibial implant in primary total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate total knee arthroplasty (TKA) radiographically to detect the occurrence of radiolucent lines (RLL) under the tibial base plate and to determine what type of RLL may have a correlation with aseptic loosening (AL). The study had two hypotheses: (1) RLLs may have different radiological aspects and evolutions in time depending of different factors (2) Signs of micro- and/or macro-mobility of the implant are necessary before diagnosing aseptic loosening of the tibial component. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 774 patients operated with a Vanguard TKA (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, US) from 2007 to 2015. RLLs were recorded in a database and described according to their radiological aspect, localization, time of apparition, progression and eventual evolution to AL. Other collected parameters were pre- and post-operative HKA angles, amount of post-operative HKA correction, surgical, clinical and demographic data. RESULTS: 178/774 TKAs (23%) showed RLLs under the tibial base plate including 9 (1.2%) tibial implants needing revision for AL. Three different types and two aspects of RLLs were observed. Important deformity corrections or undercorrected implants were recognized as a mechanical risk factor for loosening. Elderly women with osteoporosis and young men with important pre-operative deformities were identified as clinical risk factors for RLLs. CONCLUSIONS: RLLs are frequently present at the epiphyseal bone/implant interface after total knee arthroplasty, but do not mean the implant is loose. They can be considered a sign of reduced epiphyseal surface fixation due to micro mobility of the tibial implant. Aseptic loosening can be observed radiologically when signs of macro-mobility of the implant are present at the metaphyseal level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Periprosthetic fractures after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: On rare occasions, fractures of the tibial plateau may occur after uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and account for 2% of total UKA failures. The purpose of this narrative review is to identify and discuss potential risk factors that might lead to prevention of this invalidating complication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic database of Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane and Google Scholar were searched. A total of 457 articles related to the topic were found. Of those, 86 references were included in this narrative review. RESULTS: UKA implantation acts as a stress riser in the medial compartment. To avoid fractures, surgeons need to balance load and bone stock. Post-operative lower limb alignment, implant positioning, level of resection and sizing of the tibial tray have a strong influence on load distribution of the tibial bone. Pain on weight-bearing signals bone-load imbalance and acts as an indicator of bone remodeling and should be a trigger for unloading. The first three months after surgery are critical because of transient post-operative osteoporosis and local biomechanical changes. Acquired osteoporosis is a growing concern in the arthroplasty population. Split fractures require internal fixation, while subsidence fractures differ in their management depending of the amount of bone impaction. Loose implants require revision knee arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: Peri-prosthetic fracture is a rare, but troublesome event, which can lead to implant failure and revision surgery. Better knowledge of the multifactorial risk factors in association with a thorough surgical technique is key for prevention.

Does Medial Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis Influence Outcome Scores and Risk of Revision After Fixed-bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) and anterior knee pain sometimes are considered contraindications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, several studies have demonstrated excellent patient-reported outcome scores in patients with patellofemoral OA treated with medial mobile-bearing UKA. Because these studies assessed the outcome of mobile-bearing UKA only, we were interested to see whether that finding also applies to fixed-bearing medial UKA. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does patellofemoral OA influence patient-reported outcome scores after medial fixed-bearing UKA? (2) Does untreated medial patellofemoral OA increase the revision rate after medial fixed-bearing UKA? METHODS: Between 2008 and 2015, one surgeon performed 308 medial fixed-bearing UKAs of a single design. Of those, 80 (26%) had patellofemoral OA of at least moderate severity (ICRS III or IV), and 228 (74%) did not. During that period, the surgeon did not use patellofemoral OA as a contraindication to UKA. In all, 13 patients (10%) in the patellofemoral OA group were lost before 2-year minimum followup, and 20 (11%) in the control group (without patellofemoral OA) were lost; all other patients were available, seen in the last 5 years, and included in this retrospective study. Mean (± SD) followup in the patellofemoral OA group was 39 ± 25 months, and it was 41 ± 23 in the control group. There were 100 women and 120 men. Patients had a mean age ± SD of 65 ± 10 years and mean ± SD BMI of 29 ± 4.5 kg/m.The intraoperative status of the patellofemoral joint was assessed using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification. The primary study endpoint was the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12); we also compared scores on the Lonner PatelloFemoral Score (LPFS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Short-Form 12 (SF-12). With the numbers available, we had 80% power to detect a difference of 12.3 points on the Forgotten Joint Score. A secondary endpoint was femoral or tibial component revision for any reason verified over the phone for each included patient. RESULTS: With the numbers available, there was no difference in FJS-12 score between the UKA with patellofemoral OA group and the group without patellofemoral OA 71 ± 29 versus 77 ± 26, mean difference - 6; 95% CI, -16 to 4.5; p = 0.270). Likewise, with the numbers available, we saw no differences in LPFS, OKS and SF-12. There was no difference in survivorship from all-cause revision at 4 years between the patellofemoral OA group and the group without patellofemoral OA (98%; 95% CI, 85.8-99.7 versus 99.5%; 95% CI, 96.0-99.2%; p = 0.352). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with medial osteoarthritis in this single-center study generally benefitted from medial fixed-bearing UKA with good-to-excellent outcomes scores at short term, whether or not medial patellofemoral wear is present. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Patella alta and patellar subluxation might lead to early failure with inlay patello-femoral joint arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: With the growing interest in resurfacing procedures, several new implants have been recently introduced for isolated patello-femoral joint arthroplasty (PFA). However, not much data are available for these new techniques or about the right indications for each type of implant. METHODS: Out of a retrospective cohort of 20 inlay PFA, 11 PFA with an elevated Insall-Salvati index and an increased patello-femoral congruence angle showed an initial satisfactory result, but presented thereafter with recurrent pain and "clunk" phenomena. They were all revised after a median time of 25 months (range 8-28 months) into an onlay technique PFA and analyzed for their failure mode and revision technique. RESULTS: Clinical symptoms such as clunking, as well as abraded areas craniolateral of the inlay implant found intraoperatively, were the main observations of this study. The modified Insall-Salvati index (mISI) was significantly higher in the revised knees compared to the unrevised (median 1.8 versus 1.6; p = 0.041). VAS and KSS significantly improved after revision (median VAS reduction in pain of 4.0 points, median KSS improvement of 20.0 points; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with high-normal patellar height index or patella alta, as well as a craniolateral type of arthritis with additional lateralization, should be considered contra-indicated for an inlay technique PFA. They could be considered for a PFA system reaching further proximal into the distal femur. An onlay PFA can be an option for early revision of failed inlay implants. The clinical relevance of this study is that patella alta and patellar subluxation are more difficult to adjust for with an inlay PFJ component. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee: Identification of difficult-to-diagnose meniscal lesions.

This article characterizes common meniscal pathologies, reviews magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnostic criteria for meniscal tears, and identifies difficult-to-detect tears and fragments and the best MRI sequences and practices for recognizing these lesions. These difficult-to-diagnose meniscal lesions that radiologists should consider include tears, meniscocapsular separation lesions, and displaced meniscal fragments. Meniscus tears are either vertical, which are generally associated with traumatic injury, horizontal, which are associated with degenerative injury, or combinations of both. MRI has a high sensitivity for tears but not for fragments; MRI performance is also better for medial than lateral meniscal lesions. Fragment detection can be improved by recognizing signs secondary to migration, especially signs of epiphyseal irritation and mechanical impingement. Radial and peripheral tears, as well as those close to the posterior horn insertion, have been traditionally difficult to detect, but improvements in arthroscopic knowledge, identification of common lesion patterns, and selection of the proper MRI sequence and plane for each lesion type mean that, when properly used, MRI is an invaluable tool in detecting all types of meniscal tears.

Bone morphotypes of the varus and valgus knee.

BACKGROUND: Coronal deformity correction with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an important feature in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). The hypothesis of this study was that bone morphology would be different in varus and valgus deformity, both before osteoarthritis development as well as during and after the disease process of OA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study with measurements on preoperative and postoperative full leg standing radiographs of 96 patients who underwent TKA. The included patients were selected for this study because they had an OA knee on one side and a non-arthritic knee on the contralateral side presenting the same type of alignment as the to-be-operated knee (varus or valgus alignment on both sides). The control group of 46 subjects was a group of patients with neutral mechanical alignment who presented for ligamentous problems. A single observer measured mechanical alignment, anatomical alignment, anatomical-mechanical femoral angle and intra-articular bone morphology parameters with an accuracy of 1°. RESULTS: Varus OA group has less distal femoral valgus (mLDFA 89°) than control group (87°) and valgus OA group (mLDFA 85°). Varus OA group has same varus obliquity as control group (MPTA 87°) but more than valgus OA group (MPTA 90°). Joint Line Congruency Angle (JLCA) is 3°open on lateral side in varus and medially open in valgus OA group (2°). The non-arthritic valgus group presents a constitutional mechanical valgus of 184° Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle. DISCUSSION: Varus deformity in OA as measured with an HKA angle (HKA) <177° is a combination of distal femoral wear, tibial varus obliquity and lateral joint line opening. Valgus deformity in OA with an HKA > 183° is a combination of femoral distal joint line obliquity and wear combined with medial opening due to medial collateral ligament stretching. The clinical importance of bone morphotype analysis is that it shows the intra-articular potential of alignment correction when mechanical axis cuts are performed. CONCLUSION: Bone morphology in varus and valgus deformity is different before and after osteoarthritis. Perpendicular cuts to mechanical axes do not necessarily lead to neutral mechanical axis. Constitutional mechanical valgus was observed as 184° HKA angle before the development of OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV study.

Conversion of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to a total knee arthroplasty: can we achieve a primary result?

OBJECTIVES: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a potential treatment for isolated bone on bone osteoarthritis when limited to a single compartment. The risk for revision of UKA is three times higher than for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this review was to discuss the different revision options after UKA failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search was performed for English language articles published between 2006 and 2016. After reviewing titles and abstracts, 105 papers were selected for further analysis. Of these, 39 papers were deemed to contain clinically relevant data to be included in this review. RESULTS: The most common reasons for failure are liner dislocation, aseptic loosening, disease progression of another compartment and unexplained pain. UKA can be revised to or with another UKA if the failure mode allows reconstruction of the joint with UKA components. In case of disease progression another UKA can be added, either at the patellofemoral joint or at the remaining tibiofemoral joint. Often the accompanying damage to the knee joint doesn't allow these two former techniques resulting in a primary TKA. In a third of cases, revision TKA components are necessary. This is usually on the tibial side where augments and stems might be required. CONCLUSIONS: In case of failure of UKA, several less invasive revision techniques remain available to obtain primary results. Revision in a late stage of failure or because of surgical mistakes might ask for the use of revision components limiting the clinical outcome for the patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B(1 Supple A):65-9.

Difficult to treat osteoarticulars infections : Focus on Mycobacterial and Fungal infection.

Bone and joint infections are rare but often devastating. While bacteria are most commonly encountered organisms, mycobacteria and fungi are less frequent. Management of the latter is often more complex, especially in the presence of foreign material. We will increasingly be faced with mycobacterial and fungal bone infections, as medical conditions and newer therapeutics lead to more immunosuppression. In this article, we will review osteomyelitis, septic arthritis and peri-prosthetic joint infections related to mycobacteria and fungi.

Joint awareness in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee evaluated with the 'Forgotten Joint' Score before and after joint replacement.

PURPOSE: To utilize the 'Forgotten Joint' Score (FJS), a 12-item questionnaire analysing the ability to forget the joint, for comparing preoperative status in osteoarthritic patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Higher scores represent a better result with a maximum of 100. The hypothesis of this study was that a preoperative difference in favour of hip arthritis could eventually explain why THA is cited more often as a forgotten joint than TKA. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 150 patients with either tricompartmental knee (n = 75) or hip osteoarthritis (n = 75). Patients completed FJS-12 scores preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: A similar preoperative FJS-12 was observed for hip (22 (15)) and knee osteoarthritis (24 (17)) (n.s.). The postoperative FJS-12 score was significantly higher for THA (80 (24)) than for TKA (70 (27)) (p < 0.05). High reliability after 6 weeks was observed for the preoperative FJS-12 test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.87) in TKA. A preoperative floor effect of 15 % in THA and 0 % in TKA was found as well as a postoperative ceiling effect of 33 % in THA and 9 % in TKA. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical relevance of utilizing the FJS-12 as an instrument to evaluate outcome is strongly proposed for knee arthroplasty. In general, one is not aware of a healthy joint during the ADL, and it can therefore be regarded as 'forgotten'. The preoperative FJS-12 Score is a powerful tool to provide patients with clearer insights into their positive evolution after surgery. The use of the FJS-12 in THA is a topic for further research, as this study found that floor and ceiling effects limit its usefulness in studies evaluating clinical outcome in this area. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) distribution shows a better kinetic pattern than C-reactive protein distribution for the follow-up of early inflammation after total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) distribution could have a better kinetic pattern than C-reactive protein (CRP) distribution to evaluate early post-operative inflammation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A prospective study was performed on 587 patients. CRP and NLR were collected pre-operatively and at post-operative days 2, 4, 21 and 42. Mean peak values and distribution were compared between CRP and NLR. RESULTS: Mean CRP levels were 163, 161, 9 and 7 mg/L, respectively, at days 2, 4, 21 and 42. Mean NLR levels were 5, 3.5, 2.6 and 2.5, respectively, at days 2, 4, 21 and 42. At days 21 and 42, 20 % (102/503) and 21 % (93/433) of patients had not reached normal CRP levels. At day 21, there were 4.5 % (23/503) of patients with a NLR > 5 and 1 % (5/503) with an NLR > 10. At day 42, there were 5.5 % (24/433) of patients with an NLR > 5 and 0.7 % (3/433) with an NLR > 10. CONCLUSION: NLR has a faster normalization than CRP. It is potentially a better biomarker to follow post-operative inflammation or early infection after TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Higher forgotten joint score for fixed-bearing than for mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: To compare the postoperative subjective outcome for fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by using the forgotten joint score (FJS-12), a new patient-reported outcome score of 12 questions evaluating the potential of a patient to forget about his operated joint. The hypothesis of this study was that a mobile-bearing TKA would have a higher level of forgotten joint than a fixed-bearing model of the same design. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 100 patients who underwent TKA at least 1 year [mean (SD) 18 (5) months] before with either a fixed-bearing (N = 50) or a mobile-bearing (N = 50) TKA from the same implant family. Clinical outcome was evaluated with the knee society score and patient-reported outcome with the forgotten joint score. RESULTS: No difference was observed for demographics in between both study groups. The mean (SD) postoperative FJS-12 for the fixed-bearing TKA was 71 (28) compared to a mean (SD) of 56.5 (30) for the mobile-bearing TKA. DISCUSSION: The clinical relevance of the present retrospective study is that it shows for the first time a significant difference between fixed- and mobile-bearing TKA by using a new patient-reported outcome score. The hypothesis that mobile-bearing TKA would have a higher degree of forgotten joint than a fixed-bearing TKA could not be confirmed. A level I prospective study should be set up to objectivise these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

The constraints on day-case total knee arthroplasty: the fastest fast track.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a major orthopaedic intervention. The length of a patient's stay has been progressively reduced with the introduction of enhanced recovery protocols: day-case surgery has become the ultimate challenge. This narrative review shows the potential limitations of day-case TKA. These constraints may be social, linked to patient's comorbidities, or due to surgery-related adverse events (e.g. pain, post-operative nausea and vomiting, etc.). Using patient stratification, tailored surgical techniques and multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, day-case TKA might be achievable in a limited group of patients. The younger, male patient without comorbidities and with an excellent social network around him might be a candidate. Demographic changes, effective recovery programmes and less invasive surgical techniques such as unicondylar knee arthroplasty, may increase the size of the group of potential day-case patients. The cost reduction achieved by day-case TKA needs to be balanced against any increase in morbidity and mortality and the cost of advanced follow-up at a distance with new technology. These factors need to be evaluated before adopting this ultimate 'fast-track' approach.

Pain after total knee arthroplasty: a narrative review focusing on the stratification of patients at risk for persistent pain.

The patient with a painful arthritic knee awaiting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) requires a multidisciplinary approach. Optimal control of acute post-operative pain and the prevention of chronic persistent pain remains a challenge. The aim of this paper is to evaluate whether stratification of patients can help identify those who are at particular risk for severe acute or chronic pain. Intense acute post-operative pain, which is itself a risk factor for chronic pain, is more common in younger, obese female patients and those suffering from central pain sensitisation. Pre-operative pain, in the knee or elsewhere in the body, predisposes to central sensitisation. Pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee may also trigger neuropathic pain and may be associated with chronic medication like opioids, leading to a state of nociceptive sensitisation called 'opioid-induced hyperalgesia'. Finally, genetic and personality related risk factors may also put patients at a higher risk for the development of chronic pain. Those identified as at risk for chronic pain would benefit from specific peri-operative management including reduction in opioid intake pre-operatively, the peri-operative use of antihyperalgesic drugs such as ketamine and gabapentinoids, and a close post-operative follow-up in a dedicated chronic pain clinic.

Current opinions about coronal plane alignment in total knee arthroplasty: A survey article.

PURPOSE: To survey an audience of international knee surgeons about their current opinions on the analysis of coronal knee alignment and their objectives for postoperative alignment in total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Survey of 300 surgeons from 32 different countries with an audience response system allowing three possible answers being either a positive or negative answer or an abstention. RESULTS: Surveyed surgeons perform rarely preoperative and postoperative full leg radiographs and evaluate radiological outcomes more with short films. The main trend in this survey was towards neutral mechanical alignment, however varus alignment is acceptable in constitutional varus patients. This residual varus should be obtained through a femoral varus cut rather than a tibial varus cut. The valgus knee can remain in slight valgus but most of the correction will be performed at the femoral level. The main objective of postoperative alignment in TKA is a joint line parallel to the floor and a central load-bearing axis through the middle of the arthroplasty. Surgeons prefer unicompartmental arthroplasty more for themselves than for their patients in case of medial bone on bone arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: Neutral mechanical axis with a joint line parallel to the floor and a centrally running load bearing axis remains the central scope of the surveyed surgeons. Because of the literature on residual varus it becomes more acceptable for the orthopaedic community to accept this type of outlier before aiming at a surgical correction.

Is knee function better with contemporary modular bicompartmental arthroplasty compared to total knee arthroplasty? Short-term outcomes of a prospective matched study including 68 cases.

BACKGROUND: Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) was developed to treat medial tibiofemoral and patellofemoral osteoarthritis while preserving the anterior cruciate ligament to optimise knee kinematics. Our objective here was to compare the probability of achieving forgotten knee status and the functional outcomes at least two years after BKA versus total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We hypothesised that contemporary modular BKA produced better functional outcomes than TKA after at least two years, for patients with similar pre-operative osteoarthritic lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a two-centre prospective controlled study of 34consecutive patients who underwent BKA between January 2008 and January 2011. Each patient was matched on age, gender, body mass index, preoperative range of knee flexion, centre, and surgeon to a patient treated with TKA. An independent observer evaluated all 68 patients after six and 12months then once a year. Forgotten knee status was defined as a 100/100 value of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) and each of the five KOOS subscales. We also compared the two groups for knee range of motion, Knee Society Scores (KSSs), Timed Up-and-Go test (TUG), and UCLA Activity Score. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 3.8±1.7 years, the probability of forgotten knee status was significantly higher in the BKA group (odds ratio, 4.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-13.21; P=0.007, Chi(2) test). Mean post-operative extension was not significantly different between the groups, whereas mean range of knee flexion was significantly greater in the BKA group (130°±6° vs. 125°±8° after TKA; P=0.03). The BKA group had significantly higher mean values for the knee and function KSSs, TUG test, and UCLA score (P<0.04 for all four comparisons). CONCLUSION: After at least two years, contemporary unlinked BKA was associated with greater comfort during everyday activities (forgotten knee) and better functional outcomes, compared to TKA. These short-term results require validation in randomised trials with longer follow-ups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case-control study.

Cartilage thickness at the posterior medial femoral condyle is increased in femorotibial knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional CT arthrography study (Part 2).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the thickness of cartilage at the posterior aspect of the medial and lateral condyle in Osteoarthritis (OA) knees compared to non-OA knees using computed tomography arthrography (CTA). DESIGN: 535 consecutive knee CTAs (mean patient age = 48.7 ± 16.0; 286 males), were retrospectively analyzed. Knees were radiographically classified into OA or non-OA knees according to a modified Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grading scheme. Cartilage thickness at the posterior aspect of the medial and lateral femoral condyles was measured on sagittal reformations, and compared between matched OA and non-OA knees in the whole sample population and in subgroups defined by gender and age. RESULTS: The cartilage of the posterior aspect of medial condyle was statistically significantly thicker in OA knees (2.43 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.36, 2.51)) compared to non-OA knees (2.13 mm (95%CI = 2.02, 2.17)) in the entire sample population (P < 0.001), as well as for all subgroups of patients over 40 years old (all P ≤ 0.01), except for females above 60 years old (P = 0.07). Increase in cartilage thickness at the posterior aspect of the medial condyle was associated with increasing K/L grade in the entire sample population, as well as for males and females separately (regression coefficient = 0.10-0.12, all P < 0.001). For the lateral condyle, there was no statistically significant association between cartilage thickness and OA (either presence of OA or K/L grade). CONCLUSIONS: Cartilage thickness at the non-weight-bearing posterior aspect of the medial condyle, but not of the lateral condyle, was increased in OA knees compared to non-OA knees. Furthermore, cartilage thickness at the posterior aspect of the medial condyle increased with increasing K/L grade.