COVID-19 convalescent plasma and randomized clinical trials: rebuilding confidence by explaining failures and finding signals of efficacy.

Convalescent plasma (CP) recurs as a frontline treatment in epidemics because it is available as soon as there are survivors. The COVID-19 pandemic represented the first large-scale opportunity to shed light into mechanisms of action, safety and efficacy of CP using modern evidence-based medicine approaches. Studies ranging from observational case series to randomized controlled trials (RCT) have reported highly variable efficacy results for COVID-19 CP (CCP), resulting in uncertainty. Reasons for CCP success and failure may be hidden in study details, which are usually difficult to explain to physicians and the public but provide fertile ground for designing next-generation studies. We analyzed variables associated with efficacy such as clinical settings, disease severity, CCP SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels and function, dose, timing of administration (variously defined as time from onset of symptoms, molecular diagnosis, diagnosis of pneumonia, or hospitalization, or by serostatus), outcomes (defined as hospitalization, requirement for ventilation, clinical improvement or mortality), CCP provenance and time for collection, and criteria for efficacy. Focusing only on the results from the 30 available RCTs we noted that these were more likely to show signals of efficacy, including reductions in mortality, if the plasma neutralizing titer was [≥] 160 and the time to randomization was [≤] 9 days, consistent with passive antibody therapy efficacy requiring dosing with sufficient antibody. The fact that most studies revealed signals of efficacy despite variability in CCP and its use suggest likely therapeutic effects that become apparent despite the data noise. Despite the recent WHO guidelines discouraging CCP usage, the Omicron variant of concern is reminding us the superiority of polyclonal antibody therapies over monoclonal antibodies, and CCP from vaccinated convalescents is likely to be evaluated soon

The Current Global Status and Production Trends of Plasma Fractionation / 대한수혈학회지

The demand for medicinal products derived from plasmas are increasing on a global scale. In particular, the demand for intravenous immunoglobulin has continuously been increasing. The increase in the capacity of commercial plasma fractionators is prominent compared with that of non-profit plasma fractionators; thus, the percentage of plasmapheresis has increased with respect to that of plasma from whole blood. The inequality between the consumption of plasma-derived medicinal products and supply of raw plasma among developed countries and developing countries is due to the direct, proportional relationship between the consumption of plasma-derived medicinal products and the size of gross domestic products. Each country decides on its own system to achieve a stable supply of plasma-derived medicinal products. Although domestic production is an ideal option, many countries establish contracts with plasma fractionators. Owing to a great ripple effect, safety measures are increasingly applied, so detailed review should be conducted with consideration given to the cost-effectiveness and the situation unique to each country.