Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acad Med ; 97(9): 1374-1384, 2022 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35612915

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This is the first multisite investigation of the validity of scores from the current version of the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) in clerkship and licensure contexts. It examined the predictive validity of MCAT scores and undergraduate grade point averages (UGPAs) for performance in preclerkship and clerkship courses and on the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge examinations. It also studied students' progress in medical school. METHOD: Researchers examined data from 17 U.S. and Canadian MD-granting medical schools for 2016 and 2017 entrants who volunteered for the research and applied with scores from the current MCAT exam. They also examined data for all U.S. medical schools for 2016 and 2017 entrants to regular-MD programs who applied with scores from the current exam. Researchers conducted linear and logistic regression analyses to determine whether MCAT total scores added value beyond UGPAs in predicting medical students' performance and progress. Importantly, they examined the comparability of prediction by sex, race and ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Researchers reported medium to large correlations between MCAT total scores and medical student outcomes. Correlations between total UGPAs and medical student outcomes were similar but slightly lower. When MCAT scores and UGPAs were used together, they predicted student performance and progress better than either alone. Despite differences in average MCAT scores and UGPAs between students who self-identified as White or Asian and those from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, predictive validity results were comparable. The same was true for students from different socioeconomic backgrounds, and for males and females. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that MCAT scores add value to the prediction of medical student performance and progress and that applicants from different backgrounds who enter medical school with similar ranges of MCAT scores and UGPAs perform similarly in the curriculum.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Students, Medical , Canada , College Admission Test , Educational Measurement/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Schools, Medical , United States
2.
Can J Anaesth ; 65(1): 76-104, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29243160

ABSTRACT

OVERVIEW: The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2018 (the Guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine their publication and distribution. The Guidelines are subject to revision and updated versions are published annually. The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2018 supersedes all previously published versions of this document. Although the CAS encourages Canadian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, the CAS cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Anesthesiologists should exercise their own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/standards , Anesthesiology/standards , Patient Care/standards , Anesthesia/methods , Anesthesiologists/organization & administration , Anesthesiologists/standards , Anesthesiology/methods , Canada , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Quality of Health Care
3.
Can J Anaesth ; 64(1): 65-91, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27837405

ABSTRACT

OVERVIEW: The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2017 (the guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine their publication and distribution. Because the guidelines are subject to revision, updated versions are published annually. The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2017 supersedes all previously published versions of this document. Although the CAS encourages Canadian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, the society cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Each anesthesiologist should exercise his or her own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/standards , Anesthesiology/standards , Anesthesiology/instrumentation , Canada , Catheterization, Central Venous , Humans , Monitoring, Intraoperative , Patient Care , Preanesthetic Medication , Preoperative Care , Ultrasonography, Interventional
4.
Can J Anaesth ; 63(1): 86-112, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26576558

ABSTRACT

OVERVIEW: The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2016 (the guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine their publication and distribution. Because the guidelines are subject to revision, updated versions are published annually. The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2016 supersedes all previously published versions of this document. Although the CAS encourages Canadian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, the society cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Each anesthesiologist should exercise his or her own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.


Subject(s)
Anesthesiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Acute Pain/therapy , Analgesia, Obstetrical , Anesthesiology/education , Humans
5.
Can J Anaesth ; 62(1): 54-67, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25323121

ABSTRACT

OVERVIEW: The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2015 (the guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine their publication and distribution. Because the guidelines are subject to revision, updated versions are published annually. The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2015 supersedes all previously published versions of this document. Although the CAS encourages Canadian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, the society cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Each anesthesiologist should exercise his or her own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/standards , Anesthesiology/standards , Patient Care/standards , Anesthesia/methods , Canada , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Quality of Health Care
6.
Can J Anaesth ; 61(1): 46-59, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24385228

ABSTRACT

OVERVIEW: The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2014 (the guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine their publication and distribution. Because the guidelines are subject to revision, updated versions are published annually. The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2014 supersedes all previously published versions of this document. Although the CAS encourages Canadian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, the society cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Each anesthesiologist should exercise his or her own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/methods , Anesthesiology/methods , Patient Care/methods , Advance Care Planning/standards , Anesthesia/standards , Anesthesiology/standards , Canada , Child , Humans , Patient Care/standards , Pediatrics
7.
Can J Anaesth ; 60(1): 60-84, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23264010

ABSTRACT

OVERVIEW: The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2013 (the guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine their publication and distribution. Because the guidelines are subject to revision, updated versions are published annually. The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2013 supersedes all previously published versions of this document. Although the CAS encourages Canadian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, the society cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Each anesthesiologist should exercise his or her own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/standards , Anesthesiology/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Analgesia , Anesthesia Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Anesthesia, Obstetrical/standards , Anesthesiology/instrumentation , Canada , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Internship and Residency , Monitoring, Physiologic/standards , Pain Management , Pregnancy , Preoperative Care , Preoperative Period , Societies, Medical , Workforce
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...