How Effective Was the 2014 AUA Cryptorchidism Guideline? A Multi-institutional Evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: In 2014, the AUA published guidelines regarding the evaluation of cryptorchidism. This multi-institutional study aims to determine if these guidelines reduced the age of referral and the utilization of ultrasound in boys with cryptorchidism. We hypothesize that delayed referral continues, and utilization of ultrasound remains unchanged. METHODS: A retrospective review of boys referred for the evaluation of cryptorchidism was performed at 4 academic institutions, collecting data for 1 year prior (2013) and 2 nonconsecutive years following guideline creation (2015 and 2019). Across these time frames, we compared median ages at evaluation and surgery, and rates of patient comorbidities, orchiopexy, and preevaluation ultrasound. RESULTS: A total of 3,293 patients were included. The median age at initial pediatric urology evaluation in all cohorts was 39 months (IQR: 14-92 months). Following publication of the AUA Guidelines, there was no difference (P = .08) in the median age at first evaluation by a pediatric urologist between 2013 and 2015, and an increase (P = .03) between 2013 and 2019. Overall, 21.2% of patients received an ultrasound evaluation prior to referral, with no significant difference between 2013 and 2015 (P = .9) or 2019 (P = .5) cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that, despite publication of the AUA Guidelines on evaluation and treatment of cryptorchidism, there has been no reduction in the age of urological evaluation or the utilization of imaging in boys with undescended testis. Finding alternative avenues to disseminate these evidence-based recommendations to referring providers and exploring barriers to guideline adherence is necessary to improve care for patients with cryptorchidism.

Opioids and pediatric urology: A prospective study evaluating prescribing habits and patient postoperative pain and narcotic utilization.

INTRODUCTION: Few pediatric urologists believe patients require a majority of the doses of opioids prescribed to them postoperatively. Seeking a better understanding of postoperative pain and analgesia in pediatric urology patients may help reduce opioid over prescription while still adequately managing postoperative pain. OBJECTIVE: We sought to better understand: 1) the postoperative pain levels experienced by pediatric urology patients, 2) the factors that correlate with postoperative pain and number of opioids consumed following pediatric urologic procedures, and 3) the patients who do not require opioids after surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Pediatric patients undergoing circumcision, inguinal hernia repair, orchidopexy, or hypospadias repair were eligible to participate. Patients were enrolled in the prospective cohort on the day of the procedure. For each of the first 7 postoperative days, patients' parents completed a text message-based questionnaire, quantifying their child's pain level and the doses of pain medication the child consumed. RESULTS: 165 participants were enrolled. 57 patients underwent circumcision, 54 underwent orchiopexy, 32 underwent hypospadias repair, and 22 underwent inguinal hernia repair. For all procedure types, pain scores (p < 0.01) and doses of oxycodone consumed were highest on postoperative day one and steadily declined thereafter. Overall, average 7-day pain score (2.02; 0.86-5.14) and doses of narcotics consumed (3.50; 0-5) were low. Patients in each surgical subgroup were prescribed narcotics in excess of what was consumed. There was an average excess of 10.9 doses (0-39.0) for hypospadias repair, 8.6 (1.0-30.0) for circumcision, 9.0 (3.0-21.0) for inguinal hernia repair, and 6.1 (0-22.0) for orchiopexy. DISCUSSION: Overall, reported pain scores and number of narcotics consumed were low regardless of surgery type. Opioids were overprescribed regardless of surgery type. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that level of pain and opioid use varies by procedure type, but that number of narcotics prescribed greatly exceeds number needed.