Computed Tomography Findings Suggestive of Connective Tissue Disease in the Setting of Usual Interstitial Pneumonia.

PURPOSE: A usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern is common in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). The purpose of the study was to validate imaging findings differentiating CTD-ILD from IPF in UIP. METHODS: Patients with a multidisciplinary diagnosis of CTD-ILD or IPF and a UIP pattern on computed tomography and/or pathology were included in this study. Prevalence of 3 computed tomography findings shown to be associated with CTD-ILD (the straight edge sign [SES], the exuberant honeycombing sign, and the anterior upper lobe sign [AULS]) were tabulated in CTD-ILD and IPF subjects. The ability of each of these signs to discriminate between CTD-ILD and IPF was evaluated. Survival analysis was also performed using log-rank analysis. RESULTS: The study cohort included 50 CTD-ILD and 100 IPF subjects with UIP. The SES and the AULS were more common in CTD-ILD than IPF (prevalence, 36.0% and 34.9% in CTD-ILD vs 8.3% and 17.2% in IPF, respectively [P = 0.0105 - <0.001]). The highest specificity (95.7%) of CTD-ILD diagnosis was seen with bilateral SES. Moreover, the SES was associated with improved survival (P = 0.0383), which appeared to be largely because of improvement in survival in IPF subjects. The presence of AULS was associated with pulmonary functional abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: A radiographic UIP pattern with evidence of SES or the AULS should raise suspicion for CTD-ILD rather than IPF. Patients with IPF and SES have an attenuated disease course and might represent a different phenotype than those without the SES.

Differentiation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis from Connective Tissue Disease-Related Interstitial Lung Disease Using Quantitative Imaging.

A usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) imaging pattern can be seen in both idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). The purpose of this multicenter study was to assess whether quantitative imaging data differ between IPF and CTD-ILD in the setting of UIP. Patients evaluated at two medical centers with CTD-ILD or IPF and a UIP pattern on CT or pathology served as derivation and validation cohorts. Chest CT data were quantitatively analyzed including total volumes of honeycombing, reticulation, ground-glass opacity, normal lung, and vessel related structures (VRS). VRS was compared with forced vital capacity percent predicted (FVC%) and percent predicted diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO%). There were 296 subjects in total, with 40 CTD-ILD and 85 IPF subjects in the derivation cohort, and 62 CTD-ILD and 109 IPF subjects in the validation cohort. VRS was greater in IPF across the cohorts on univariate (p < 0.001) and multivariable (p < 0.001-0.047) analyses. VRS was inversely correlated with DLCO% in both cohorts on univariate (p < 0.001) and in the derivation cohort on multivariable analysis (p = 0.003) but not FVC%. Total volume of normal lung was associated with DLCO% (p < 0.001) and FVC% (p < 0.001-0.009) on multivariable analysis in both cohorts. VRS appears to have promise in differentiating CTD-ILD from IPF. The underlying pathophysiological relationship between VRS and ILD is complex and is likely not explained solely by lung fibrosis.

Combined cut down and endovascular retrieval of orphaned ventriculoatrial shunt with stenting of chronic superior vena cava occlusion.

Revascularization of the superior vena cava (SVC) in the context of symptomatic luminal obstruction is a therapeutic intervention performed for SVC syndrome of benign or malignant etiology. Venous occlusion can preclude future access and cause symptoms ranging from mild chest discomfort to the more serious effects of SVC syndrome. This case report demonstrates the treatment of a novel case of SVC syndrome arising from a previously placed SVC stent. An intravascular, extraluminal orphaned ventriculoatrial shunt was used to go through the SVC but around the existing lumen-limiting stent to place a new larger stent for revascularization. This case highlights the need for an innovative approach for complex foreign body retrieval and treatment of chronic SVC occlusion.

Use of an intraocular handpiece for the removal of magnets from the oropharynx of a pediatric patient.

With the increasing availability of magnets within household objects and toys, otolaryngologists must be aware of the propensity of ingestions or impaction of magnets within the upper aerodigestive tract of pediatric patients. We describe a case of a 21-month old male who presented with throat pain after swallowing ten 0.5-inch magnetic balls, after which evaluation revealed the adherence the the of three magnets within the posterior oropharynx and an additional seven magnets in the small intestine. After an initial failed attempt to remove the pharyngeal magnets with forceps, the magnets were successfully removed using an ophthalmic intraocular magnet handpiece designed for ophthalmologic procedures. Use of this device should be taken into consideration for similar cases.