Weekly paclitaxel and concurrent pazopanib following doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy for HER-negative locally advanced breast cancer: NSABP Foundation FB-6, a phase II study.

This multicenter single-arm phase II study evaluated the addition of pazopanib to concurrent weekly paclitaxel following doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-negative locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Patients with HER2-negative stage III breast cancer were treated with doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) for four cycles every 3 weeks followed by weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for four cycles concurrently with pazopanib 800 mg orally daily prior to surgery. Post-operatively, pazopanib was given daily for 6 months. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast and lymph nodes. Between July 2009 and March 2011, 101 patients with stage IIIA-C HER2-negative breast cancer were enrolled. The pCR rate in evaluable patients who initiated paclitaxel and pazopanib was 17 % (16/93). The pCR rate was 9 % (6/67) in hormone receptor-positive tumors and 38 % (10/26) in triple-negative tumors. Pre-operative pazopanib was completed in only 39 % of patients. The most frequent grade 3 and 4 adverse events during paclitaxel and pazopanib were neutropenia (27 %), diarrhea (5 %), ALT and AST elevations (each 5 %), and hypertension (5 %). Although the pCR rate of paclitaxel and pazopanib following AC chemotherapy given as neoadjuvant therapy in women with LABC met the pre-specified criteria for activity, there was substantial toxicity, which led to a high discontinuation rate of pazopanib. The combination does not appear to warrant further evaluation in the neoadjuvant setting for breast cancer.

Perioperative DCF chemotherapy protocol for patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: correlation between response to treatment and outcome.

To determine whether metabolic or pathological response to preoperative chemotherapy can predict the relapse-free survival of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated on a perioperative chemotherapy protocol. The prospectively collected data of a recently reported phase II trial of perioperative DCF chemotherapy (docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil) were analyzed. Median relapse-free survival (RFS) was compared with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test between responders and non-responders according to defined metabolic (reduction in maximum standard uptake value of at least 35 %) and pathological (greater than 50 % tumor regression or ypN(0) status) criteria. A double-sided p value equal or inferior to 0.05 was considered significant. Patients were followed for a median of 807 days (95 % CI: 607-896). RFS was 576 days in metabolic non-responders versus not reached in metabolic responders (p 0.009) and 562 days in ypN+ versus not reached in ypN(0) patients (p 0.045). No statistically significant RFS difference was seen between low and high pathologic responders classified according to tumor regression criteria, although a trend was observed in favor of high pathologic responders. Simple metabolic and pathologic criteria used for the assessment of response to the preoperative part of perioperative chemotherapy can help to estimate the outcome of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients.

Perioperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) for locally advanced esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Although perioperative chemotherapy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (ADC) improves survival, the overall poor prognosis suggests that further refinement of treatment is required. Docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (DCF) is effective for metastatic ADC of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract; we thus sought to investigate the efficacy of this regimen in patients with resectable disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with resectable ADC of the upper GI tract received DCF [docetaxel (Taxotere) 75 mg/m(2) I.V. day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) I.V. day 1, 5-FU 750 mg/m(2) continuous infusion for 120 h, every 3 weeks] for three cycles before and after resection. Primary end point was complete resection; secondary end points were response, toxicity, surgical morbidity, and overall survival. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with ADC of the esophagus (11), gastroesophageal junction (25), or stomach (7) started treatment and 86% completed all preoperative cycles with grade 3-4 toxicity arising in 47%. Metabolic response to chemotherapy (reduction in maximal standard uptake value >35%) was achieved in 25/33 (76%) patients. Surgery was carried out in 41/43 and complete resection was achieved in all 41 patients with pathologic complete response in 4/41. Postoperative chemotherapy was started in 29 patients and completed in 24. Three-year overall survival was 60%. CONCLUSION: Perioperative DCF is a tolerable and highly effective regimen for the treatment of esophagogastric ADC.

Capecitabine-induced cardiotoxicity: case report and review of the literature.

Capecitabine, an oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5FU), has been integrated into the management of multiple cancer types because of convenience of administration and efficacy comparable with 5fu. Cardiotoxicity induced by 5FU-in particular angina-has been well described in the literature, but reports of adverse cardiac events with capecitabine are also emerging. The mechanism underlying 5FU cardiotoxicity has long been thought to result from coronary vasospasm, but animal-model studies and patient echocardiographic findings both suggest a cardiomyopathic picture. Although 5FU cardiotoxicity is often reversible and can be managed supportively, presentations that are more severe-including arrhythmias, acute ischemic events, and cardiogenic shock-have been documented. In this report, we describe the case of a patient who ultimately required a pacemaker after developing symptomatic bradycardia and sinus arrest while receiving capecitabine for colon cancer.

Prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with colorectal cancer: a consensus statement by the Canadian Working Group on Chemotherapy-Induced Diarrhea.

Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea (cid) is a common side effect of cancer treatment and can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Diarrhea is frequently severe enough to require a dose reduction of, a delay in, or a discontinuation of chemotherapy. Diarrhea-associated mortality has been reported to be as high as 3.5% in clinical trials of irinotecan and bolus 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer. The frequency of cid and its impact on patient management are frequently under-recognized in clinical practice.A Canadian working group, consisting of medical oncologists and an oncology pharmacist, was formed in 2001 to review the optimal approach to managing cid and to identify and implement new areas of research. The recommendations that follow are the result of the group's work.Acute medical management of cid includes loperamide or diphenoxylate as first-line agents. Subcutaneous octreotide is recommended for intractable grade 2 diarrhea and may be considered for grade 1 cid that does not resolve with high-dose loperamide. Hospitalization is recommended for patients with grades 3 and 4 cid; in-hospital care includes rehydration, antibiotic therapy, and octreotide.A chemotherapy dose reduction is generally advised for patients who have experienced grade 3 or 4 diarrhea in a previous chemotherapy cycle. If a dose reduction is not desired, prophylaxis with intramuscular long-acting release octreotide may be considered.The foregoing recommendations are based on expert opinion and require validation in prospective clinical trials.

Randomized trial of 3-hour versus 24-hour infusion of high-dose paclitaxel in patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-26.

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel is an active drug for the treatment of breast cancer; however, the appropriate duration of administration is unknown. We assessed and compared the response rate, event-free survival, survival, and toxicity of paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2) delivered every 3 weeks as a 3-hour or 24-hour infusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 563 women with stage IV or IIIB breast cancer were randomized into one of two groups: 279 received 3-hour paclitaxel and 284 received 24-hour paclitaxel. Patients were stratified by age, stage of disease, and prior therapy. RESULTS: A significantly higher rate of tumor response occurred in the first four cycles of therapy in patients who received the 24-hour infusion of paclitaxel (51% v 41%, respectively; P =.025). Tumor response over all cycles was also significantly higher in the group that received 24-hour infusion (54% v 44%, respectively; P =.023). There were no significant differences in event-free survival or survival between the two arms of the study (P =.9 and.8, respectively). No treatment by stage or by age interactions were observed. During the first four cycles of therapy, at least one episode of >/= grade 3 toxicity (excluding nadir hematologic values, alopecia, and weight change) occurred in 45% of patients who received the 3-hour paclitaxel infusion and in 50% of those who received the 24-hour paclitaxel infusion. Febrile neutropenia, >/= grade 3 infection, and >/= grade 3 stomatitis were less frequent, and severe neurosensory toxicity was more frequent in those who received the 3-hour paclitaxel infusion. Ten treatment-related deaths occurred in the first four cycles. Age, stage, and prior chemotherapy did not influence the effect of treatment. CONCLUSION: When administered as a continuous 24-hour infusion, high-dose paclitaxel results in a higher tumor response rate than when administered as a 3-hour infusion but does not significantly improve event-free survival or survival. Paclitaxel as a 24-hour infusion results in increased hematologic toxicity and decreased neurosensory toxicity.

Randomized evaluation of controlled-release codeine and placebo in chronic cancer pain.

Codeine is widely used in combination with acetaminophen and aspirin for the management of mild to moderate pain. However, there are few controlled clinical trials of single-entity codeine in chronic cancer pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of controlled-release codeine given every 12 hr in patients with cancer pain. Thirty-five patients with chronic cancer pain were randomized in a double-blind crossover study to controlled-release (CR) codeine or placebo, for 7 days each. Pain intensity was assessed at 0800 hr and 2000 hr using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a five-point categorical scale, and the use of "rescue" acetaminophen-plus-codeine (300 mg/30 mg every 4 hr as needed) was recorded. Thirty patients completed the study (17 male, 13 female; mean age, 64.4 +/- 9.8 years) with a mean daily CR codeine dose of 277 +/- 77 mg (range, 200-400 mg). CR codeine treatment resulted in significantly lower overall VAS pain intensity scores (22 +/- 18 mm versus 36 +/- 20 mm, P = 0.0001), categorical pain intensity scores (1.2 +/- 0.8 versus 1.8 +/- 0.8, P = 0.0001), and pain scores when assessed by day of treatment and by time of day. Daily "rescue" analgesic consumption was significantly lower on CR codeine, compared to placebo treatment (2.2 +/- 2.3 versus 4.6 +/- 2.8 tablets per day, P = 0.0001). Both patients and investigators preferred CR codeine to placebo (80% versus 3%, P = 0.0014 and 73% versus 7%, P = 0.0160, respectively). These data indicate that CR codeine, given every 12 hr results in significant reductions in pain intensity and the use of "rescue" acetaminophen-plus-codeine in patients with cancer pain. CR codeine provides the benefits of a flexible single entity codeine formulation and the convenience of 12-hr duration of action, which allows patients uninterrupted sleep and improved compliance.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of hydromorphone and hydromorphone-3-glucuronide in cancer patients after immediate and controlled-release hydromorphone.

Although the pharmacokinetics of oral hydromorphone has been evaluated in healthy volunteers after small single oral doses, data are not available regarding the disposition of hydromorphone and its principal metabolite, hydromorphone-3-glucuronide (H3G), at steady-state and after large oral doses. The authors studied the pharmacokinetics of hydromorphone and H3G after oral administration of an immediate-release (IR) and controlled-release (CR) formulation of hydromorphone at a daily dose of 48 +/- 11 mg (range 6-216 mg) in a randomized, double-blind, steady-state, two-way crossover evaluation in 18 patients with chronic cancer pain. Controlled-release hydromorphone demonstrated equivalent bioavailability and acceptable CR characteristics, when compared with IR hydromorphone (CR vs. IR: AUC0-12 123.10 +/- 20.38 vs. 118.98 +/- 20.92 ng.hr.mL-1, P = NS, Cmax 17.76 +/- 3.07 vs. 19.70 +/- 4.04 ng.mL-1, P = NS, Cmin 6.04 +/- 1.01 vs. 5.28 +/- 1.000 ng.mL-1, P = NS, and Tmax 4.78 +/- 0.78 vs. 1.47 +/- 0.22 hr, P = 0.0008). A significant linear relationship existed between hydromorphone dose and hydromorphone AUC (r = 0.8315, P = 0.0001) and between hydromorphone AUC and H3G AUC (r = 0.8048, P = 0.0001) over a wide dose range. The steady-state molar ratio of H3G to hydromorphone was 27:1. The authors conclude that CR hydromorphone provides a pharmacokinetic profile consistent with 12 hourly dosing and that at steady state, oral hydromorphone is extensively metabolized to H3G, although the pharmacologic activity of this metabolite remains unknown.

The diagnostic value of CA 27-29, CA 15-3, mucin-like carcinoma antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 19-9 in breast and gastrointestinal malignancies.

In the past decade, considerable interest has arisen for defining the role of various tumor markers in the diagnosis of cancer. This cross-sectional study evaluates four breast cancer markers (CA 27-29, CA 15-3, MCA and CEA) and two gastrointestinal (GI) markers (CA 19-9 and CEA) in 213 patients. Receiver operating curves (ROC) revealed a sensitivity for the 90% specificity cutoff for breast cancers compared to breast benign diseases of 70% for CA 27-29, 67.5% for CA 15-3, 52.5% for MCA and 40% for CEA. When GI tumors were compared to benign GI disease, the sensitivity for 90% specificity was 40.3% for CEA and 32.3% for CA 19-9. Comparison of breast cancer and GI malignancies with other malignancies leads to a marked shift of the ROC curve to the right and loss of specificity. Late stage for all breast and GI tumor markers was found to be a predictor of high serum antigen level (p < 0.001). The presence of liver metastases in breast cancer was associated with abnormal levels of CA 27-29 (p = 0.028). Pancreas adenocarcinomas had a higher CA 19-9 antigen level (p < 0.001) than other GI malignancies. CA 27-29 appears to be at least as sensitive and specific as CA 15-3 in patients with breast cancer. None of the above markers retain their specificity when compared with a control group consisting of other malignancies.

Development of critical appraisal skills in medical students: opportunities in oncology-related learning situations.

Considering the increasing need for medical students to acquire critical appraisal skills, we have reviewed the curriculum at McGill as to where and how this subject is taught. It is apparent that critical evaluation is covered formally and informally in the course of the four years of medical school. However, this effort is limited by other demands on curriculum time. It could be extended by practical applications, utilizing opportunities arising in oncology-related learning situations, identifiable during periods of clinical electives, clerkship and options, and laboratory research. The elements of a core curriculum to develop critical appraisal skills and a pertinent bibliography have been identified. This information will be transmitted to oncologists supervising medical students, with the intention of eventually providing it to teachers in other specialties with the hope thereby of reaching all medical students. Concurrently, means of evaluating the method and results need to be formulated.

Pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of oral morphine solution and controlled-release morphine tablets in cancer patients.

Twenty-three adult patients with chronic pain due to cancer completed a double-blind, randomized, two-phase crossover trial comparing plasma morphine concentrations and analgesic efficacy of oral morphine sulfate solution (MSS) and controlled-release morphine sulfate tablets (MS Contin [MSC], Purdue Frederick, Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada). MS Contin was given every 12 hours to all patients except those whose daily morphine dose could not be equally divided into two 12-hour doses with the tablet strengths available. MSS was given every 4 hours. Patients received both of the test drugs for at least 5 days, and, on the final day of each phase, peripheral venous blood samples for morphine analysis were obtained. Eighteen patients received MSC every 12 hours, and five received it every 8 hours. The same total daily morphine dose was given in both phases. In the 18 patients who received MSC every 12 hours, the daily morphine dose was 183.9 +/- 140.0 mg (mean +/- SD). In this group, the mean area under the curve (AUC) with MSC was 443.6 +/- 348.4 ng/ml/hour, compared with 406.8 +/- 259.7 ng/ml/hour for MSS (P greater than 0.20). Mean maximum morphine concentrations (Cmax) for MSC and MSS were 67.9 +/- 42.1 and 58.8 +/- 30.3 ng/ml, respectively (P greater than 0.05). Mean minimum morphine concentrations (Cmin) were 17.0 +/- 17.7 and 18.3 +/- 15.0, respectively (P greater than 0.30). There was a significant difference (P less than 0.001) between the two drugs in time required to reach maximum morphine concentration (Tmax). Mean Tmax after MSC occurred at 3.6 +/- 2.3 hours. After MSS, it occurred at 1.3 +/- 0.4 hours. In the five patients who received MSC every 8 hours, the findings paralleled those in the principal group, with no significant differences between MSC and MSS in Cmax or Cmin and a highly significant difference between the two in Tmax. However, in this small group of patients, the AUC with MSC was significantly (P = 0.04) greater than that with MSS. All patients had very good pain control throughout the study and both formulations were well tolerated. There were no significant differences between MSC and MSS in pain scores or side effects. Under the conditions of this study there was no clinically significant difference in bioavailability between MSC and oral MSS. When given on a 12-hourly basis in individually titrated doses, the MSC provided therapeutic plasma morphine concentrations throughout the dosing interval.

Hepatic malignancies: improved treatment with intraarterial Y-90.

An improved treatment method for hepatic malignancies with yttrium-90 incorporated into the matrix of glass microspheres was evaluated prospectively. Fifteen patients with 12 metastatic colorectal cancers, one carcinoid, one islet cell tumor, and one hepatoma were treated with three dose levels: 5,000 cGy (5,000 rad), ten patients; 7,500 cGy (7,500 rad), three patients; and 10,000 cGy (10,000 rad), two patients. Mean follow-up was 7 months (range, 2-12 months). Stable disease in the liver was seen in ten patients, four of whom had concurrent progression of extrahepatic disease, which resulted in two deaths. Two additional deaths were not directly related to the malignant process. Progression of liver disease was found in five patients, with three deaths occurring at 7-8 months. No procedural, hematologic, or pulmonary complications occurred. Late gastroduodenal ulceration occurred at 6-8 weeks in three patients who had histories of chronic alcohol abuse. This method of therapy seems to be feasible and efficient. Caution is necessary with high doses or with patients with a history of or predisposition to gastroduodenal ulcers.

Combination chemotherapy with mastectomy or radiotherapy for stage III breast carcinoma: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.

One hundred thirteen evaluable patients with previously untreated stage III breast carcinoma were treated with three monthly cycles of cyclophosphamide (CYC), doxorubicin (DOX), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), vincristine (VCR), and prednisone (PRED) (CAFVP). Subsequently, 91 (81%) were deemed operable. Patients were then randomized to receive surgery or radiotherapy (RT) to determine which of these modalities afforded better local tumor control. All patients also received 2 additional years of CAFVP in a further attempt to eradicate local disease and systemic micrometastases. Forty-one of the randomized patients have relapsed. Approximately half of the initial relapses in each arm were local. The overall duration of disease control was similar following either modality, with a median of 29.2 months for surgery patients and 24.4 months for RT patients. Similarly, there was no major difference in survival related to randomized treatment with an overall median of 39 months (median follow-up 37 months). Pre- or perimenopausal status and inflammatory disease were associated with shorter disease control and survival. Treatment was generally well tolerated and toxicity was acceptable. This study demonstrates that prolonged control of stage III breast carcinoma can be achieved with combined modality therapy in which cytotoxic chemotherapy precedes and follows treatment directly primarily at the breast tumor, using either surgery or RT. Nevertheless, new regimens must be designed if significant advances that may lead to the cure of this disease are to be achieved.

Ambulatory hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy for cancer of the liver.

We have used continuous hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy to treat 105 patients with cancer of the liver originating from colorectal, other gastrointestinal, and nongastrointestinal sites. The response rate seen in colorectal metastases was two to three times that expected for systemic chemotherapy. The median survival of responders of 16 months was significantly better then for nonresponders (6 months). The median duration of response was 9 months. The results for patients with other tumor types were less encouraging. Although minor problems developed in about 30 percent of the patients, major complications requiring removal of the catheter were not common. Expertise derived from managing many patients and a team approach, with a defined protocol for catheter care and follow-up, contributed to the success of the ambulatory program. However, the role of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy remains under debate. At the root of the controversy is the lack of randomized, controlled trials supporting the superiority of hepatic arterial infusion over systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. This and other issues, including the current liberal use of implanted infusion pumps, should be studied.

Mallory-Weiss tear. A complication of cancer chemotherapy.

Since the original report by Mallory and Weiss of tears in the lower esophagus or cardia of the stomach following alcoholic debauch, there have been many other cases, associated with sundry other causes, described in the literature. Recently, a Mallory-Weiss tear was reported in a patient as a complication of cancer chemotherapy. This article describes two similar cases and suggests that the Mallory-Weiss syndrome should be included in the differential diagnosis of any patient with epigastric pain, hematemesis, or melena after chemotherapy-induced retching or vomiting.

Multi-drug chemotherapy with and without radiation for carcinoma of the stomach and pancreas: a prospective randomized trial.

A prospectively randomized trial in advanced gastric and pancreatic carcinoma compared multi-drug chemotherapy, with and without radiotherapy to the local lesion, in terms of median survival and toxicity. Of 29 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, 14 were randomized to receive 5-FU and Methyl-CCNU, and 15 to receive 5-FU and local radiotherapy to a dose of 4600 rad, and then Methyl-CCNU. Thirty patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were similarly randomized. There was no significant difference between the two arms of the gastric or pancreatic adenocarcinoma groups, with a median survival of 13 months and 11.5 months respectively in gastric carcinoma, and 7.8 months and 7.3 months in pancreatic carcinoma. Complications were minimal in both groups. There was more hematopoietic depression in the radiation-treated patients, but none had radiotherapy discontinued because of toxicity.

Disposition of 5-fluorouracil during chronic hepatic arterial infusion to patients with carcinoma in the liver and effect on circulating platelets.

5-Fluorouracil was administered by continuous hepatic intra-arterial infusion to eight patients with the diagnosis of cancer of the gastrointestinal tract and hepatic metastases. Its elimination characteristics were investigated to see if they correlated with therapeutic effect or reduced clinical toxicity when the drug was given by this route. Urinary excretion of drug and metabolites was similar to findings after intravenous bolus doses. Disposition changes could not be correlated with therapeutic effect or clinical toxicity. A dose-related biphasic effect of 5-fluorouracil was found on circulating platelets. Doses greater than 6 mg kg-1 d-1 decreased the number of circulating platelets, while doses less than that resulted in an increase in circulating platelets. Further studies are required to determine the mechanism of the effect of 5-fluorouracil on platelets.

Disposition of 5-fluorouracil after intravenous bolus doses of a commercial formulation to cancer patients.

A high-pressure liquid chromatographic method that is used to determine the pharmacokinetic disposition of 5-fluorouracil from the plasma compartment is presented. The method requires only 0.5 ml of plasma for each determination and is sensitive to 0.1 mg of drug per liter. Novel methodology with the use of an ion-specific electrode technique for the determination of urinary excretion kinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites is also presented. This study demonstrated a much greater variability for the disposition of 5-fluorouracil by cancer patients than has been reported previously. The apparent volume of distribution for this drug varied more than 37-fold. Its plasma half-life varied more than 19-fold, and its urinary excretion half-life varied almost 400-fold. These data are compatible with the hypothesis that this variation could account, at least in part, for the variable therapeutic and toxic response to 5-fluorouracil. The methodology presented in this study is sufficiently simple and sensitive to allow assessment of this hypothesis by investigating cancer patients who receive therapeutic doses of 5-fluorouracil.