Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 51
Filter
2.
Am J Hematol ; 99(4): 615-624, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343151

ABSTRACT

Venetoclax-azacitidine is approved for treatment of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy based on the interim overall survival (OS) analysis of the VIALE-A study (NCT02993523). Here, long-term follow-up is presented to address survival benefit and long-term outcomes with venetoclax-azacitidine. Patients with newly diagnosed AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to receive venetoclax-azacitidine or placebo-azacitidine. OS was the primary endpoint; complete remission with/without blood count recovery (CR/CRi) was a key secondary endpoint. This final analysis was conducted when 100% of the predefined 360 OS events occurred. In VIALE-A, 431 patients were enrolled to venetoclax-azacitidine (n = 286) or placebo-azacitidine (n = 145). At 43.2 months median follow-up, median OS was 14.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.1-18.7) with venetoclax-azacitidine, and 9.6 months (95% CI, 7.4-12.7) with placebo-azacitidine (hazard ratio, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.47-0.72], p < .001); the estimated 24-month OS rate was 37.5% and 16.9%, respectively. Median OS for patients with IDH1/2 mutations and those with measurable residual disease responses was reached in this final analysis. CR/CRi rate was similar to interim analysis. Any-grade hematologic and gastrointestinal adverse events were most common in venetoclax-azacitidine and placebo-azacitidine arms, including thrombocytopenia (47% and 42%) and neutropenia (43% and 29%). No new safety signals were identified. Long-term efficacy and safety confirm venetoclax-azacitidine is an improvement in standard-of-care for patients with AML who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy because of advanced age or comorbidities.


Subject(s)
Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Neutropenia , Sulfonamides , Humans , Follow-Up Studies , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Azacitidine/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
3.
Blood Adv ; 8(1): 164-171, 2024 01 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38039510

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Various socioeconomic and biologic factors affect cancer health disparities and differences in health outcomes. To better characterize the socioeconomic vs biologic determinants of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) outcomes, we conducted a single-institution, retrospective analysis of adult patients with ALL treated at the University of Chicago (UChicago) from 2010 to 2022 and compared our outcomes with the US national data (the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER] database). Among 221 adult patients with ALL treated at UChicago, BCR::ABL1 was more frequent in patients with higher body mass index (BMI; odds ratio [OR], 7.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-49.9) and non-Hispanic Black (NHB) ancestry (59% vs 24% in non-Hispanic White (NHW) and 20% in Hispanic patients; P = .001). In a multivariable analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 6.93; 95% CI, 2.27-21.1) and higher BMI at diagnosis (HR, 10.3; 95% CI, 2.56-41.5) were independent predictors of poor overall survival (OS). In contrast, race or income were not predictors of OS in the UChicago cohort. Analysis of the national SEER database (2010-2020) demonstrated worse survival outcomes in Hispanic and NHB patients than in NHW patients among adolescent and young adults (AYAs) but not in older adults (aged >40 years). Both AYA and older adult patients with higher median household income had better OS than those with lower income. Therefore, multidisciplinary medical care coupled with essential supportive care services offered at centers experienced in ALL care may alleviate the socioeconomic disparities in ALL outcomes in the United States.


Subject(s)
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Socioeconomic Factors , Adolescent , Humans , Young Adult , Black or African American , Hispanic or Latino , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/epidemiology , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Social Determinants of Health , United States/epidemiology , White , Adult
4.
Nature ; 615(7954): 920-924, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36922593

ABSTRACT

Targeting critical epigenetic regulators reverses aberrant transcription in cancer, thereby restoring normal tissue function1-3. The interaction of menin with lysine methyltransferase 2A (KMT2A), an epigenetic regulator, is a dependence in acute leukaemia caused by either rearrangement of KMT2A or mutation of the nucleophosmin 1 gene (NPM1)4-6. KMT2A rearrangements occur in up to 10% of acute leukaemias and have an adverse prognosis, whereas NPM1 mutations occur in up to 30%, forming the most common genetic alteration in acute myeloid leukaemia7,8. Here, we describe the results of the first-in-human phase 1 clinical trial investigating revumenib (SNDX-5613), a potent and selective oral inhibitor of the menin-KMT2A interaction, in patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukaemia (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04065399). We show that therapy with revumenib was associated with a low frequency of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events and a 30% rate of complete remission or complete remission with partial haematologic recovery (CR/CRh) in the efficacy analysis population. Asymptomatic prolongation of the QT interval on electrocardiography was identified as the only dose-limiting toxicity. Remissions occurred in leukaemias refractory to multiple previous lines of therapy. We demonstrate clearance of residual disease using sensitive clinical assays and identify hallmarks of differentiation into normal haematopoietic cells, including differentiation syndrome. These data establish menin inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for susceptible acute leukaemia subtypes.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Nucleophosmin , Proto-Oncogene Proteins , Humans , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase/chemistry , Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase/genetics , Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase/metabolism , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Neoplasm, Residual/drug therapy , Nucleophosmin/genetics , Prognosis , Protein Binding/drug effects , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Remission Induction
6.
Blood ; 140(17): 1875-1890, 2022 10 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35839448

ABSTRACT

The fusion gene MLL/AF4 defines a high-risk subtype of pro-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Relapse can be associated with a lineage switch from acute lymphoblastic to acute myeloid leukemia, resulting in poor clinical outcomes caused by resistance to chemotherapies and immunotherapies. In this study, the myeloid relapses shared oncogene fusion breakpoints with their matched lymphoid presentations and originated from various differentiation stages from immature progenitors through to committed B-cell precursors. Lineage switching is linked to substantial changes in chromatin accessibility and rewiring of transcriptional programs, including alternative splicing. These findings indicate that the execution and maintenance of lymphoid lineage differentiation is impaired. The relapsed myeloid phenotype is recurrently associated with the altered expression, splicing, or mutation of chromatin modifiers, including CHD4 coding for the ATPase/helicase of the nucleosome remodelling and deacetylation complex. Perturbation of CHD4 alone or in combination with other mutated epigenetic modifiers induces myeloid gene expression in MLL/AF4+ cell models, indicating that lineage switching in MLL/AF4 leukemia is driven and maintained by disrupted epigenetic regulation.


Subject(s)
Myeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia Protein , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Humans , Myeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia Protein/genetics , Myeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia Protein/metabolism , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/metabolism , Epigenesis, Genetic , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/genetics , Genes, Regulator , Chromatin
7.
Clin Cancer Res ; 28(13): 2744-2752, 2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35063965

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of venetoclax + azacitidine among treatment-naïve patients with FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were pooled from patients enrolled in a phase III study (NCT02993523) that compared patients treated with venetoclax + azacitidine or placebo + azacitidine and a prior phase Ib study (NCT02203773) where patients were treated with venetoclax + azacitidine. Enrolled patients were ineligible for intensive therapy due to age ≥75 years and/or comorbidities. Patients on venetoclax + azacitidine received venetoclax 400 mg orally (days 1-28) and azacitidine (75 mg/m2; days 1-7/28-day cycle). FLT3 mutation was analyzed centrally on pretreatment bone marrow aspirates. RESULTS: In the biomarker evaluable population, FLT3 mutation was detected in 42 (15%) and 22 (19%) patients in the venetoclax + azacitidine and azacitidine groups. Composite complete remission [CRc; complete remission (CR) + CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi)] rates (venetoclax + azacitidine/azacitidine) for FLT3-mutant patients were 67%/36%, median duration of remission (DoR) was 17.3/5.0 months, and median OS was 12.5/8.6 months. The CRc rates among FLT3 wild-type patients were 67%/25%, median DoR 18.4/13.4 months, and median OS 14.7/10.1 months. In patients treated with venetoclax + azacitidine, CRc in patients with FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD was 63% and 77% and median OS was 9.9 and 19.2 months, and in comutated FLT3-ITD + NPM1 patients, CRc was 70%, median DoR was not reached, and median OS was 9.1 months. There were no unexpected toxicities in the venetoclax + azacitidine group. CONCLUSIONS: When treated with venetoclax + azacitidine, patients with FLT3 mutations and FLT3 wild-type had similar outcomes. Future analyses in larger patient populations may further define the impact of venetoclax + azacitidine in patients harboring FLT3-ITD. See related commentary by Perl and Vyas, p. 2719.


Subject(s)
Dancing , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Azacitidine/administration & dosage , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Mutation , Sulfonamides , fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3/genetics
8.
J Clin Oncol ; 40(8): 855-865, 2022 03 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34910556

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: There is limited evidence on the clinical utility of monitoring measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with lower-intensity therapy. Herein, we explored the outcomes of patients treated with venetoclax and azacitidine who achieved composite complete remission (CRc; complete remission + complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery) and MRD < 10-3 in the VIALE-A trial. METHODS: The patients included in this report were treated with venetoclax and azacitidine. Bone marrow aspirate samples for multiparametric flow cytometry assessments were collected for central analysis at baseline, end of cycle 1, and every three cycles thereafter. MRD-negative response was defined as < 1 residual blast per 1,000 leukocytes (< 10-3 or 0.1%) with an estimated analytic sensitivity of 0.0037%-0.0027%. CRc, duration of remission (DoR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. A multivariate Cox regression analysis identified prognostic factors associated with OS. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-four of one hundred ninety (86%) patients with CRc were evaluable for MRD. MRD < 10-3 was achieved by 67 of 164 (41%), and 97 of 164 (59%) had MRD ≥ 10-3. The median DoR, EFS, and OS were not reached in patients with CRc and MRD < 10-3, and the 12-month estimates for DoR, EFS, and OS in this group were 81.2%, 83.2%, and 94.0%. Among patients with CRc and MRD ≥ 10-3, the median DoR, EFS, and OS were 9.7, 10.6, and 18.7 months. Multivariate analysis showed that CRc with MRD < 10-3 was a strong predictor of OS (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.285; 95% CI, 0.159 to 0.510; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients who achieved CRc and MRD < 10-3 with venetoclax and azacitidine had longer DoR, EFS, and OS, than responding patients with MRD ≥ 10-3.


Subject(s)
Azacitidine , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Neoplasm, Residual , Prognosis , Remission Induction , Sulfonamides
9.
EJHaem ; 2(3): 413-420, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35844676

ABSTRACT

Although acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is most common in pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients, 20% of cases are diagnosed in patients ≥ 55 years old. Use of intensive pediatric regimens in AYA populations has demonstrated excellent tolerability and significant improvements in event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). The backbone of pediatric regimens includes asparaginase and corticosteroids, both of which are associated with more toxicity in older patients and those with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m which leads to poor tolerance of these regimens. We tested the safety and efficacy of a dose-modified The Cancer and Leukemia Group B 10403 regimen using reduced doses of pegylated (PEG)-asparaginase (ASP) and corticosteroids (RD-10403) in 30 patients with Philadelphia-chromosome negative ALL who were ≥50-year-old and younger adults with significant metabolic or hepatic co-morbidities. The complete remission rate on day 28 was 77%, 3-year EFS was 54%, and estimated 3-year OS was 55%. Grade 3+ toxicity was noted in 40% of patients during induction, and induction-related mortality was 3%. Additional prospective evaluation of RD-10403 is merited to determine efficacy and safety of this regimen and to serve as a framework for chemoimmunotherapy combination therapy.

10.
Am J Hematol ; 96(2): 208-217, 2021 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33119898

ABSTRACT

This analysis represents the longest-term follow-up for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with 400 mg of venetoclax plus azacitidine or decitabine. Adults with newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were enrolled in an open-label, non-randomized, multicenter phase 1b trial of venetoclax with azacitidine (AZA; 75 mg/m2 ; days 1-7) or decitabine (DEC; 20 mg/m2 ; days 1-5). Endpoints included safety, response rates (complete remission [CR], CR with incomplete blood count recovery [CRi]), response duration and overall survival (OS). The median follow-up time was 29 and 40 months for patients treated with venetoclax plus AZA and DEC combinations, respectively. Key Grade ≥ 3 AEs (AZA and DEC) were febrile neutropenia (39% and 65%), anemia (30% and 26%), thrombocytopenia (25% and 23%), and neutropenia (20% and 10%). The CR/CRi rate was 71% for venetoclax plus AZA and 74% for venetoclax plus DEC. The median duration of CR/CRi was 21.9 months and 15.0 months, and the median OS was 16.4 months and 16.2 months, for venetoclax plus AZA and DEC, respectively. These results support venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents as highly effective frontline AML therapies for patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Anemia , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Febrile Neutropenia , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Thrombocytopenia , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anemia/chemically induced , Anemia/epidemiology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Azacitidine/administration & dosage , Azacitidine/adverse effects , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/administration & dosage , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/adverse effects , Decitabine/administration & dosage , Decitabine/adverse effects , Febrile Neutropenia/chemically induced , Febrile Neutropenia/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Sulfonamides/administration & dosage , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Thrombocytopenia/epidemiology
11.
N Engl J Med ; 383(7): 617-629, 2020 08 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32786187

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have a dismal prognosis, even after treatment with a hypomethylating agent. Azacitidine added to venetoclax had promising efficacy in a previous phase 1b study. METHODS: We randomly assigned previously untreated patients with confirmed AML who were ineligible for standard induction therapy because of coexisting conditions, because they were 75 years of age or older, or both to azacitidine plus either venetoclax or placebo. All patients received a standard dose of azacitidine (75 mg per square meter of body-surface area subcutaneously or intravenously on days 1 through 7 every 28-day cycle); venetoclax (target dose, 400 mg) or matching placebo was administered orally, once daily, in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population included 431 patients (286 in the azacitidine-venetoclax group and 145 in the azacitidine-placebo [control] group). The median age was 76 years in both groups (range, 49 to 91). At a median follow-up of 20.5 months, the median overall survival was 14.7 months in the azacitidine-venetoclax group and 9.6 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.85; P<0.001). The incidence of complete remission was higher with azacitidine-venetoclax than with the control regimen (36.7% vs. 17.9%; P<0.001), as was the composite complete remission (complete remission or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery) (66.4% vs. 28.3%; P<0.001). Key adverse events included nausea of any grade (in 44% of the patients in the azacitidine-venetoclax group and 35% of those in the control group) and grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia (in 45% and 38%, respectively), neutropenia (in 42% and 28%), and febrile neutropenia (in 42% and 19%). Infections of any grade occurred in 85% of the patients in the azacitidine-venetoclax group and 67% of those in the control group, and serious adverse events occurred in 83% and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In previously untreated patients who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, overall survival was longer and the incidence of remission was higher among patients who received azacitidine plus venetoclax than among those who received azacitidine alone. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was higher in the venetoclax-azacitidine group than in the control group. (Funded by AbbVie and Genentech; VIALE-A ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02993523.).


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Azacitidine/administration & dosage , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/administration & dosage , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Sulfonamides/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Azacitidine/adverse effects , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intention to Treat Analysis , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Leukopenia/chemically induced , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia/etiology , Recurrence , Remission Induction , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced
13.
Blood Adv ; 4(4): 599-606, 2020 02 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32074275

ABSTRACT

In this phase 1 study, azacitidine (AZA) was given before high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) and mitoxantrone (mito) based on the hypothesis that epigenetic priming with a hypomethylating agent before cytotoxic chemotherapy would improve response rates in patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), including relapsed/refractory disease. The primary objective was to establish the recommended phase 2 dose of AZA given before standard HiDAC/mito. In a dose escalation scheme, 46 patients (median age, 66 years) received AZA at 37.5, 50, or 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously or IV once daily on days 1 to 5 followed by HiDAC (3000 mg/m2) and mitoxantrone (30 mg/m2) once each on days 6 and 10 (the HiDAC/mito dose was reduced 33% in elderly subjects). Two dose-limiting toxicities occurred (both in the same patient): acute liver failure and kidney injury at the 50 mg/m2 dose. The 30-day induction death rate was 2.2% (1 of 46). The overall response rate, including complete remission and complete remission with incomplete count recovery, was 61% (28 of 46). Previously untreated patients aged ≥60 years with therapy-related AML and de novo AML were more likely to respond than untreated patients with AML progressing from an antecedent hematologic disorder (myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia). Patients with favorable European Leukemia Network risk (P = .008), NPM1 mutations (P = .007), or IDH2 mutations (P = .03) were more likely to respond, and those with TP53 mutations (P = .03) were less likely to respond. The recommended phase 2 dose of AZA is 75 mg/m2 per day on days 1 to 5 followed by HiDAC (3000 mg/m2) and mitoxantrone (30 mg/m2) once each on days 6 and 10. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01839240.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Mitoxantrone , Aged , Azacitidine/adverse effects , Cytarabine/adverse effects , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Nucleophosmin , Remission Induction
14.
Cancer Discov ; 9(6): 778-795, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30944118

ABSTRACT

Even though the Ten-eleven translocation (TET) enzymes catalyze the generation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosines required for lineage commitment and subsequent differentiation of stem cells into erythroid cells, the mechanisms that link extracellular signals to TET activation and DNA hydroxymethylation are unknown. We demonstrate that hematopoietic cytokines phosphorylate TET2, leading to its activation in erythroid progenitors. Specifically, cytokine receptor-associated JAK2 phosphorylates TET2 at tyrosines 1939 and 1964. Phosphorylated TET2 interacts with the erythroid transcription factor KLF1, and this interaction with TET2 is increased upon exposure to erythropoietin. The activating JAK2V617F mutation seen in myeloproliferative disease patient samples and in mouse models is associated with increased TET activity and cytosine hydroxymethylation as well as genome-wide loss of cytosine methylation. These epigenetic and functional changes are also associated with increased expression of several oncogenic transcripts. Thus, we demonstrate that JAK2-mediated TET2 phosphorylation provides a mechanistic link between extracellular signals and epigenetic changes during hematopoiesis. SIGNIFICANCE: Identification of TET2 phosphorylation and activation by cytokine-stimulated JAK2 links extracellular signals to chromatin remodeling during hematopoietic differentiation. This provides potential avenues to regulate TET2 function in the context of myeloproliferative disorders and myelodysplastic syndromes associated with the JAK2V617F-activating mutation.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 681.


Subject(s)
Cytokines/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Hematopoiesis/genetics , Janus Kinase 2/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Transcriptional Activation , Biomarkers , Dioxygenases , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/cytology , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/metabolism , Humans , Phosphorylation
15.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 60(8): 1972-1977, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30633573

ABSTRACT

Entospletinib (GS-9973), an oral, selective inhibitor of spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK), was evaluated as monotherapy in this multicenter, phase 2 study (NCT01799889) of 49 patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including those with Richter's transformation (RT), who had received prior therapy with a B-cell receptor (BCR) inhibitor. Patients were treated with entospletinib 400 mg BID as the starting dose. Sixteen patients achieved partial response and 21 had stable disease. The overall response rate was 32.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.7-45.3%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 (95% CI: 3.7-8.3) months. Twenty-one (of 43) patients (48.8%) experienced nodal response. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in all patients; most commonly fatigue, diarrhea, and anemia. Entospletinib monotherapy has clinical activity for patients with CLL and RT who have relapsed following therapy with BCR inhibitors.


Subject(s)
Indazoles/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Pyrazines/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Humans , Indazoles/administration & dosage , Indazoles/adverse effects , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/mortality , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Pyrazines/administration & dosage , Pyrazines/adverse effects , Receptors, Antigen, B-Cell/antagonists & inhibitors , Recurrence , Retreatment , Treatment Outcome
16.
J Oncol Pract ; 14(11): 649-657, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30423270

ABSTRACT

The treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) has evolved rapidly in the past two decades after the introduction of highly active drugs, including tretinoin (all- trans-retinoic acid) and arsenic trioxide. It is now possible to treat this disease without the use of traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Today's clinical guidelines include multiple regimens, some of which continue to use cytotoxic chemotherapy. This leaves the practicing oncologist with multiple treatment options when faced with a new case of APL. In an effort to standardize our approach to the treatment of newly diagnosed APL, we sought to develop a set of treatment recommendations at our institution. We identified eight major controversial issues in the treatment of APL. These controversial issues include the optimal dose and schedule of both all- trans-retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide, the optimal regimen for high-risk APL, the need for intrathecal prophylaxis, the use of prophylactic corticosteroids, and the need for maintenance therapy after consolidation. We reviewed the relevant literature and used the Delphi method among the coauthors to reach consensus for recommendations on the basis of the best available data and our own clinical experience. In this clinical review, we present our consensus recommendations, the reasoning behind them, and the grading of the evidence that supports them.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute/therapy , Adult , Age Factors , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Arsenic Trioxide/administration & dosage , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/prevention & control , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/secondary , Clinical Trials as Topic , Consolidation Chemotherapy , Disease Management , Drug Administration Schedule , Expert Testimony , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy , Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute/diagnosis , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Tretinoin/administration & dosage
17.
Blood Adv ; 2(14): 1705-1718, 2018 07 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30030269

ABSTRACT

Prior to novel targeted agents for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the best chemoimmunotherapy regimen in patients with non-del(11q) disease was unclear. The role of lenalidomide was also not defined. This phase 2 study randomized 342 untreated patients with non-del(11q) CLL requiring therapy to fludarabine plus rituximab (FR; n = 123), FR plus lenalidomide consolidation (FR+L; n = 109), or FR plus cyclophosphamide (FCR; n = 110) and compared 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates of each to the historical control rate with FC (60%). Patients with del(11q) in at least 20% of pretreatment cells continued with FCR (n = 27) or were reassigned to FCR+L (n = 31) and excluded from the primary analysis. Among non-del(11q) patients, 2-year PFS rates were 64% (90% confidence interval [CI], 57-71; FR), 72% (90% CI, 65-79; FR+L), and 74% (90% CI, 66-80; FCR); FR+L and FCR had rates significantly greater than historical control. Median PFS was significantly shorter with FR compared with FR+L (P = .04) and FCR (P < .001): 43 (95% CI, 33-50), 61 (95% CI, 45-71), and 97 (95% CI, 61 to not reached) months, respectively. Median follow-up was 73 months and median overall survival (OS) was only reached with FCR (101 months; 95% CI, 96 to not reached). With FR+L, the risk of death decreased over time and was lower than with FR at later time points (P = .01), but not significantly different from FCR (P = .21). Future studies incorporating short courses of lenalidomide into other novel treatment regimens are justified.


Subject(s)
Consolidation Chemotherapy , Immunotherapy , Lenalidomide/administration & dosage , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/mortality , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Survival Rate
18.
Acta Haematol ; 139(2): 132-139, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29444501

ABSTRACT

We reported that PIM1 kinase is expressed in the lymphocytes of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Quercetin, a naturally occurring flavonoid, is a dietary supplement and inhibits many kinases, including PIM1, in vitro. Under an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol, we performed an open-label, single-arm pilot study to evaluate the antitumor activity of quercetin in patients with CLL/SLL. Q-ForceTM chews were administered orally, 500 mg twice daily, for 3 months. Eligible patients had failed prior therapies, had had no other standard treatment, or refused other therapies. Response was assessed based on objective change in disease parameters. Patients were included if their lymphocyte counts were rising and ≥10,000/µL but not > 100,000/µL. Three patients received quercetin treatment. There was no toxicity. Two responded with stabilization of rising lymphocyte counts (p < 0.001 for each), which remained stable during their follow-up (5 and 11 months after cessation of treatment, respectively). The CLL cells in the nonresponder harbored a TP53 mutation. Although our data from this pilot translational study are based on a small sample, further studies of quercetin as a potential therapeutic agent in selected patients with CLL/SLL appear warranted.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-pim-1/metabolism , Quercetin/therapeutic use , Aged , Biomarkers , Dietary Supplements , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/mortality , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Pilot Projects , Quercetin/administration & dosage , Quercetin/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
19.
Lancet Oncol ; 19(2): 216-228, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29339097

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) with acute myeloid leukaemia have poor outcomes and no effective standard-of-care therapy exists. Treatment with hypomethylating agents such as azacitidine and decitabine is common, but responses are modest and typically short-lived. The oral anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 protein inhibitor, venetoclax, has shown promising single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia and preclinical data suggested synergy between hypomethylating agents and venetoclax, which led to this combination phase 1b study. METHODS: Previously untreated patients aged 65 years and over with acute myeloid leukaemia who were ineligible for standard induction therapy were enrolled into this non-randomised, open-label, phase 1b study. Patients were required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and either intermediate-risk or poor-risk cytogenetics. Patients were enrolled into one of three groups for the dose-escalation phase of this study: group A (venetoclax and intravenous decitabine 20 mg/m2 [days 1-5 of each 28-day cycle]), group B (venetoclax and subcutaneous or intravenous azacitidine 75 mg/m2 [days 1-7 of each 28-day cycle]), and group C (a venetoclax and decitabine substudy with the oral CYP3A inhibitor posaconazole, 300 mg twice on cycle 1, day 21, and 300 mg once daily from cycle 1, days 22-28, to assess its effect on venetoclax pharmacokinetics). Dose escalation followed a standard 3 + 3 design with at least three evaluable patients enrolled per cohort; daily target doses of venetoclax for groups A and B were 400 mg (cohort 1), 800 mg (cohorts 2 and 3), and 1200 mg (cohort 4), and 400 mg for group C. The primary endpoints were the safety and pharmacokinetics of venetoclax plus decitabine or azacitidine, and to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary endpoints included the preliminary anti-leukaemic activity of venetoclax with decitabine or azacitidine through the analysis of overall response, duration of response, and overall survival. We analysed safety, pharmacokinetics, and anti-leukaemic activity in all patients who received one or more venetoclax doses. The expansion phase of the study is ongoing but is closed to accrual. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02203773. FINDINGS: 57 patients were enrolled in the study. 23 patients in group A and 22 patients in group B were enrolled between Nov 19, 2014, and Dec 15, 2015, and 12 patients in group C were enrolled between June 14, 2015, and Jan 16, 2016. As of data cutoff on June 15, 2016, the most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (27 [47%] of 57 patients; nine in group A, 13 in group B, and five in group C), febrile neutropenia (24 [42%] of 57; 11 in group A, ten in group B, and three in group C), and neutropenia (23 [40%] of 57; 12 in group A, eight in group B, and three in group C). The most common serious treatment-emergent adverse event in groups A and B was febrile neutropenia (seven [30%] of 23 patients vs seven [32%] of 22), whereas in group C it was lung infection (four [33%] of 12 patients). 49 (86%) of 57 patients had treatment-related adverse events; the most common in groups A and B included nausea (12 [52%] patients vs seven [32%] patients), fatigue (six [26%] patients vs seven [32%]), and decreased neutrophil count (six [26%] patients vs six [27%]), whereas in group C the most common were nausea (seven [58%] of 12 patients), leucopenia (six [50%]), vomiting (five [42%]), and decreased platelet count (five [42%]). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The recommended phase 2 dose was 400 mg once a day or 800 mg with an interrupted dosing schedule (safety expansion). In total, four (7%) of 57 patients had died within 30 days of the first venetoclax dose caused by sepsis (group B), bacteraemia (group A), lung infection (group C), and respiratory failure (group A). Tumour lysis syndrome was not observed. Decitabine and azacitidine did not substantially affect venetoclax exposures. Overall, 35 (61%; 95% CI 47·6-74·0) of 57 patients achieved complete remission or complete remission with incomplete marrow recovery. In groups A and B, 27 (60%; 95% CI 44·3-74·3) of 45 patients had complete remission or complete remission with incomplete marrow recovery. INTERPRETATION: Venetoclax plus hypomethylating agent therapy seems to be a novel, well-tolerated regimen with promising activity in this underserved patient population. Evaluation of expansion cohorts is ongoing at 400 mg and 800 mg doses using both hypomethylating agent combinations. FUNDING: AbbVie and Genentech.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Patient Safety , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Azacitidine/adverse effects , Azacitidine/therapeutic use , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/adverse effects , Confidence Intervals , Decitabine/adverse effects , Decitabine/therapeutic use , Disease-Free Survival , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Prognosis , Remission Induction , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
20.
J Hematol Oncol ; 11(1): 4, 2018 01 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29304833

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Novel therapies for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are imperative, particularly for those with high-risk features. Selinexor, an exportin 1 (XPO1/CRM1) inhibitor, has demonstrated anti-leukemia activity as a single agent, as well as in combination with anthracyclines and/or DNA-damaging agents. METHODS: We report the findings of a phase I dose escalation trial with cohort expansion in 20 patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory AML that combined selinexor with age-adjusted high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (HiDAC/Mito). RESULTS: Three (15%) patients received the initial dose of 60 mg of selinexor (~ 35 mg/m2), and 17 (85%) received the target level of 80 mg (~ 50 mg/m2). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Common adverse events included febrile neutropenia (70%), diarrhea (40%), anorexia (30%), electrolyte abnormalities (30%), bacteremia (25%), cardiac toxicities (25%), fatigue (25%), and nausea/vomiting (25%). None were unexpected given the HiDAC/Mito regimen. Serious adverse events occurred in 6 (30%) patients; one was fatal. Ten (50%) patients achieved a complete remission (CR), 3 (15%) achieved CR with incomplete recovery (CRi), 1 (5%) achieved partial remission (PR), and 6 (30%) had progressive disease for an overall response rate (ORR) of 70%. Eight of 14 (57%) responders proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Correlative studies of WT1 levels showed persistently detectable levels in patients who either did not respond or relapsed quickly after induction. CONCLUSION: The selinexor/HiDAC/Mito regimen is feasible and tolerable at selinexor doses of 80 mg/day (~ 50 mg/m2/day) twice weekly. The recommended phase II dose is 80 mg and warrants further study in this combination. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02573363 . Registered October 5, 2015.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cytarabine/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Mitoxantrone/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Cytarabine/administration & dosage , Cytarabine/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Mitoxantrone/administration & dosage , Mitoxantrone/adverse effects , Remission Induction/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...