ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The evidence base for disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs used in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is surprisingly weak, with most having little robust evidence to support their clinical use. Furthermore, there remain safety and tolerability concerns with both these and more recently available biological therapies. Apremilast , a novel, small molecule, represents the first oral therapy specifically developed for PsA. AREAS COVERED: This review describes the pharmacokinetic properties of apremilast and available data demonstrating significant benefits to both clinical and histological features of inflammatory arthritis. The key findings from a large Phase III clinical program will also be discussed, including short- and long-term efficacy outcomes and, importantly, the safety profile. Indications other than PsA will also be briefly reviewed. Given the recent nature of much of the data, published literature as well as information available only in the abstract format are included in this review. EXPERT OPINION: Studies show that treatment with apremilast results in significant improvement in both skin psoriasis and PsA symptoms. Apremilast has been approved by both the United States FDA and European Medicines Agency for treatment of PsA. Use of this medication is recommended in active PsA patients, according to local licensing.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Thalidomide/analogs & derivatives , Antirheumatic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Arthritis, Psoriatic/immunology , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Humans , Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Thalidomide/pharmacokinetics , Thalidomide/therapeutic useABSTRACT
A 42-year-old woman presented with a 2-day history of drowsiness, confusion, worsening headache, high fevers, urticarial rash, bilateral leg pains and urinary retention. Preceding this was a 1-month history of headache unresponsive to various analgesics for which her general practitioner started carbamazepine. Suspected central nervous system infection was investigated and treated with cefotaxime. A full septic screen, lumbar puncture and MRI of the spine were all inconclusive. After 3â days, the patient deteriorated and repeated blood tests-initially unremarkable-revealed neutropaenia and acutely deranged liver function. Connective tissue disorder was considered due to a negative septic screen and lack of response to antibiotics, but autoimmune screens failed to reveal a culprit. At this point, carbamazepine was suspected and stopped, after which the patient and her blood results recovered dramatically. This adds to previous reports of known reactions to carbamazepine and reinforces recommendations that patients should be made aware of potential complications of this drug.