A randomized trial of a nurse-led educational intervention in patients with heart failure and their caregivers: impact on caregiver outcomes.

AIMS: Psychoeducational interventions focusing on self-management of heart failure (HF) patients may improve patient health knowledge and reduce hospitalizations, but data regarding the effects on caregiver outcomes are inconclusive. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a single-centre, randomized controlled study to evaluate the effect of a nurse-led educational intervention in dyads of recently hospitalized HF patients and their caregivers on caregiver burden, feelings of guilt and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Dyads were randomized to usual care plus intervention group 1 (IG-1) or 2 (IG-2) or usual care only (control group, CG). Educational sessions in IG-1 and IG-2 were initiated before hospital discharge and continued with combination of home visits and telephone sessions in IG-1, or telephone sessions only in IG-2, delivered on regular intervals for 6 months. Caregiver burden was assessed by Heart Failure Caregiver Questionnaire (HF-CQ v5.0), guilt by Caregiver Guilt Questionnaire (CGQ), and QOL by EuroQol EQ-5D. Fifty-seven patient/caregiver dyads were included: 12 in IG-1, 18 in IG-2, and 27 in CG, of whom 11, 16, and 20, respectively, completed the study. All domains of HF-CQ and CGQ improved in IG-1 and IG-2 at 6 months, whereas deteriorated in CG (all P < 0.01). EQ-5D improved in IG-1 and IG-2 only in visual analogue scale part (P = 0.002), but not in the descriptive part. CONCLUSION: A nurse-led, 6-month educational intervention on recently hospitalized HF patients/caregiver dyads, delivered through either combined home visits and telephone sessions or telephone sessions only, reduced caregiver burden and feelings of guilt, with lesser effect on HR-QoL. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05480969.

Endothelial glycocalyx integrity in oncological patients.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is associated with early changes in the cardiovascular system (CV) before overt cardiotoxicity. Endothelial dysfunction is induced by chemotherapeutic regimens but there is no data for endothelial glycocalyx in cancer. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with cancer (65.6% with solid tumors and 34.4% with hematological malignancies) and 32 controls from the outpatient cardiology clinic were included in the study. The perfused boundary region (PBR) of the sublingual arterial microvessels, Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AI) were measured. A standard transthoracic echocardiogram plus assessment of global longitudinal strain (GLS) of all cardiac chambers were performed. RESULTS: There was no difference in the baseline profile (age, sex, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and coronary artery disease) and in the echocardiographic parameters between the two groups, with the exception of left atrial volume (33.3 ± 13 in cancer patients vs 27.6 ± 6.5 ml/m2 in controls). PBR 5-25 and PBR 20-25 were significantly increased in cancer patients vs controls (2.11 ± 0.36 vs 1.97 ± 0.21 µm, p = 0.025 and 2.65 ± 0.48 vs 2.40 ± 0.36 µm, p = 0.012, respectively). Endothelial glycocalyx thickness impairment was independent of traditional CV risk factors and anticancer therapy, but proportional to disease stage (r = 0.337, p = 0.044). However, there was no difference in arterial stiffness between the two groups (PWV 10.74 ± 4.11 vs 11.26 ± 3.38 m/s, p = 0.539 and AI 11.28 ± 28.87 vs 15.38 ± 18.8 %, p = 0.470). CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial function as assessed by endothelial glycocalyx thickness is significantly impaired in cancer patients without overt cardiotoxicity. This implies that PBR might be useful for the early assessment of microvascular and endothelial toxicity of cancer.