Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hum Fertil (Camb) ; 27(1): 2362980, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842163

ABSTRACT

Fertility restoration potential of immature testicular tissue (ITT) depends on the number of spermatogonial cells in the retrieved tissue prior to cryopreservation in oncofertility programme. There are limited data on the association between type of malignancy and testicular germ cell population. Hence, this study is aimed to investigate the spermatogonial and Sertoli cell population in ITT retrieved from 14 pre-pubertal boys who opted for fertility preservation. Histopathological and immunochemical analysis of seminiferous tubules from haematological (N = 7) and non-haematological (N = 7) malignant patients revealed 3.43 ± 2.92 and 1.71 ± 1.81 spermatogonia per tubular cross section (S/T), respectively. The Sertoli cell number was comparable between haematological and non-haematological group (18.42 ± 3.78 and 22.03 ± 10.43). Spermatogonial quantity in ITT did not vary significantly between haematological and non-haematological cancers. This observation, though preliminary, would contribute to the limited literature on paediatric male oncofertility.


Subject(s)
Fertility Preservation , Neoplasms , Spermatogonia , Humans , Male , Fertility Preservation/methods , Child , Cryopreservation , Testis , Child, Preschool , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Sertoli Cells , Infertility, Male/etiology , Infertility, Male/therapy
2.
F1000Res ; 12: 153, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37767024

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians not only coordinate referrals to oncology services but can play a crucial role in successful fertility preservation referrals in cancer-diagnosed patients. Hence, it is important to assess their knowledge and attitudes towards fertility preservation. METHODS: An eighteen-item oncofertility survey was administered to primary care physicians between May 2019 to September 2020.  Results: A total of forty-six responses were received and analysed. About 60% of primary care physicians did not have adequate knowledge about available fertility preservation options and only 26-32% were aware of international guidelines recommending fertility preservation in cancer patients.  Conclusions: Imparting awareness and knowledge of fertility preservation and its options to primary care physicians could enable an integrated cancer care model while also facilitating successful oncofertility referrals in countries like India.


Subject(s)
Fertility Preservation , Neoplasms , Physicians, Primary Care , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Attitude , India
3.
Toxicol Rep ; 8: 114-123, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33425685

ABSTRACT

Chemotherapy can affect testis development of young boys with cancer, reducing the chances of fatherhood in adulthood. Studies using experimental models are needed to determine the damage caused by individual chemotherapy drugs in order to predict the risk of infertility and direct patients towards appropriate fertility preservation options. Here, we investigated the individual role of two drugs, cisplatin and doxorubicin, using an in vitro culture model of prepubertal (postnatal day 5) mouse testis that supports induction and maintenance of full spermatogenesis. Twenty-four hour exposure with either drug at clinically-relevant doses (0.25, 0.5 or 0.75 µg/mL for cisplatin, or 0.01, 0.03 or 0.05 µg/mL for doxorubicin), induced an acute significant loss of spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs; PLZF+), proliferating SSCs (PLZF+BrdU+), total germ cells (MVH+), and spermatocytes (SCP3+) one week after chemotherapy exposure. By the time of the first (Week 4) and second (Week 8) waves of spermatogenesis, there was no longer any effect on SSC or proliferating SSC numbers in drug-exposed testis compared to untreated tissue: however, the populations of total germ cells and spermatocytes were still lower in the higher-dose cisplatin treated groups, along with a reduced frequency of round and elongated spermatids in both cisplatin- and doxorubicin-treated testis fragments. Overall, this study details a direct impairment of germ cell development following acute chemotherapy-induced damage during the prepubertal phase, most likely due to an effect on SSCs, using an in vitro culture system that successfully recapitulates key events of mouse spermatogenesis.

4.
Reprod Sci ; 28(8): 2161-2173, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33319342

ABSTRACT

Cryopreservation of immature-testicular-tissue (ITT) prior to gonadotoxic treatment, while experimental, is the only recommended option for fertility preservation in prepubertal boys. The handling and manipulation of ITT before cryopreservation could influence the functionality of cells during fertility restoration, which this study explored by evaluating cellular niche and quality of mouse ITT subjected to various temperatures and time durations in vitro. ITT from 6-day-old mice were handled at ultraprofound-hypothermic, profound-hypothermic, and mild-warm-ischemic temperatures for varying time periods prior to 14-day organotypic culture. Viability, functionality, synaptonemal complex and chromatin remodeling markers were assessed. Results have shown that cell viability, testosterone level, and in vitro proliferation ability did not change when ITT were held at ultraprofound-hypothermic-temperature up to 24 h, whereas cell viability was significantly reduced (P < 0.01), when held at profound-hypothermic-temperature for 24 h before culture. Further, cell viability and testosterone levels in cultured cells from profound-hypothermic group were comparable to corresponding ultraprofound-hypothermic group but with moderate reduction in postmeiotic cells (P < 0.01). In conclusion, holding ITT at ultraprofound-hypothermic-temperature is most suitable for organotypic culture, whereas short-term exposure at profound-hypothermic-temperature may compromise postmeiotic germ cell yield post in vitro culture. This data, albeit in mouse model, will have immense value in human prepubertal fertility restoration research.


Subject(s)
Fertility Preservation/methods , Organ Culture Techniques , Temperature , Testis/cytology , Animals , Cell Survival , Cryopreservation , Male , Mice , Sertoli Cells/cytology , Time Factors
5.
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol ; 10(1): 71-77, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32456519

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Recommendations from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) emphasize the critical need to understand current trends in fertility preservation (FP) among the two sets of primary health care providers involved in oncofertility: the oncologists and the gynecologists. This study is aimed at understanding the health care providers' knowledge, attitudes, and barriers in oncofertility across India. Methods: An 18-item oncofertility survey was designed and directed to 77 oncologists and 214 gynecologists across India. The responses were analyzed by using descriptive statistical methods, and the oncofertility trends between the two groups were studied. Results: The total response rate was 34%, with 49 of 214 oncologists (23%) and 49 of 77 gynecologists (64%) participating in the survey. The awareness of ASCO FP guidelines among oncologists and gynecologists was 53% and 59.5%, respectively. About 48% of oncologists felt knowledgeable about sperm banking, whereas 52% knew about oocyte freezing but not about other options. On the other hand, among gynecologists, 38% reported inadequate knowledge of testicular or ovarian tissue cryopreservation. About 85% of oncologists reported routine referral of cancer diagnosed patients for FP, whereas 75% of gynecologists reported routine FP discussion with patients. Health care providers from both groups perceived the major barriers in oncofertility to be, "financial burden on the patient" (73%-86%) and, "lack of patient awareness" (71%-79.5%). Conclusion: Effective collaboration between oncologists and gynecologists is essential to establish a successful FP program. Economic burden on the patient and lack of patient and physician awareness are limiting factors that need to be overcome.


Subject(s)
Fertility Preservation , Neoplasms , Oncologists , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 41(6): 991-997, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33032909

ABSTRACT

Reopening fertility care services across the world in the midst of a pandemic brings with it numerous concerns that need immediate addressing, such as the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on the male and female reproductive cells and the plausible risk of cross-contamination and transmission. Due to the novelty of the disease the literature contains few reports confirming an association of SARS-CoV-2 with reproductive tissues, gametes and embryos. Cryobanking, an essential service in fertility preservation, carries the risk of cross-contamination through cryogenic medium and thus calls for risk-mitigation strategies. This review aims to address the available literature on the presence of SARS-CoV-2 on tissues, gametes and embryos, with special reference to the possible sources of cross-contamination through liquid nitrogen. Strategies for risk mitigation have been extrapolated from reports dealing with other viruses to the current global crisis, for safety in fertility treatment services in general, and specifically for oncofertility.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Cryopreservation , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Fertility Preservation , Germ Cells , Pandemics , Cryopreservation/standards , Female , Fertility Preservation/methods , Fertility Preservation/standards , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , Infection Control/standards , Male , SARS-CoV-2/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...