Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Addict Behav ; 36(7): 749-54, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21440994

ABSTRACT

This study tested whether differences in cannabis cessation 3 months after a single session of Motivational Interviewing (MI) may be attributable to fidelity to MI. All audio-recordings with necessary 3-month follow-up data (n=75) delivered by four individual practitioners within a randomised controlled trial (RCT) were used. Participants were weekly or more frequent cannabis users aged 16-19 years old in Further Education colleges. All tapes were coded with the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) scale Version 2 by 2 coders. Satisfactory inter-rater reliability was achieved. Differences between and within practitioners in fidelity to MI were consistently detected. After controlling for practitioner effects, Motivational Interviewing spirit and the proportion of complex reflections, were independently predictive of cessation outcome. No other aspects of fidelity were associated with outcome. Two particular aspects of enhanced fidelity to MI are predictive of subsequent cannabis cessation 3 months after a brief intervention among young cannabis users.


Subject(s)
Interview, Psychological , Marijuana Abuse/psychology , Motivation , Adolescent , Female , Humans , London , Male , Marijuana Abuse/rehabilitation , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ; 82(7): 803-9, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21217155

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Depression and anxiety are common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and although clinically important remain poorly understood and managed. To date, research has tended to treat depression and anxiety as distinct phenomena. There is growing evidence for heterogeneity in PD in the motor and cognitive domains, with implications for pathophysiology and outcome. Similar heterogeneity may exist in the domain of depression and anxiety. OBJECTIVE: To identify the main anxiety and depression related subtype(s) in PD and their associated demographic and clinical features. METHODS: A sample of 513 patients with PD received a detailed assessment of depression and anxiety related symptomatology. Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to identify putative depression and anxiety related subtypes. Results LCA identified four classes, two interpretable as 'anxiety related': one anxiety alone (22.0%) and the other anxiety coexisting with prominent depressive symptoms (8.6%). A third subtype (9%) showed a prominent depressive profile only without significant anxiety. The final class (60.4%) showed a low probability of prominent affective symptoms. The validity of the four classes was supported by distinct patterns of association with important demographic and clinical variables. CONCLUSION: Depression in PD may manifest in two clinical phenotypes, one 'anxious-depressed' and the other 'depressed'. However, a further large proportion of patients can have relatively isolated anxiety. Further study of these putative phenotypes may identify important differences in pathophysiology and other aetiologically important factors and focus research on developing more targeted and effective treatment.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/psychology , Depression/psychology , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Aged , Anxiety/classification , Anxiety/epidemiology , Cluster Analysis , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Depression/classification , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Reproducibility of Results , Socioeconomic Factors
3.
Drug Alcohol Rev ; 28(1): 18-24, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19320671

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) is under-studied among young drinkers, as are the contributions of individual items to total AUDIT scores, and online performance of the existing briefer versions of this instrument. DESIGN AND METHODS: This study examined individual items of the AUDIT, and various combinations, including the existing briefer versions, in relation to total AUDIT scores in a Web-based study of young drinkers. A total of 167 young people aged 16-24 years old who had consumed any alcohol within the previous 7 days were recruited by both offline and online methods. RESULTS: Considered individually, items 3, 4, 5 and 8 were predictive of the majority of the variance in total AUDIT scores in this Web-based study. Existing briefer versions of the AUDIT do not better predict total scores than possible alternative combinations of items, for which acceptable levels of sensitivity and specificity for screening have been demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Short forms of the AUDIT, particularly those based only on consumption questions, require further validation study in online applications with young people.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Alcohol-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Internet , Adolescent , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Sensitivity and Specificity , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
4.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 96(1-2): 121-7, 2008 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18406079

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To compare the psychometric performance of a range of existing alcohol measures when data are collected online with young people, and thereby to gain insights into the reliability and validity of this mode of data collection. METHOD: One hundred and sixty-seven U.K. resident young people aged 16-24 who had drunk alcohol within the past week participated in a cross-sectional psychometric study with a test-retest reliability component. Eight hazardous drinking measures were used: the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) summary instrument and dedicated assessments of consumption (timeline follow-back and diary-format recall of alcohol drunk in the last 7 days), dependence (Leeds dependence questionnaire and severity of dependence scale) and problems (Rutgers alcohol problem index, alcohol problems scale and academic role expectations and alcohol scale). RESULTS: Internal consistency and test-retest correlation statistics were generally satisfactory, providing evidence of reliability. Validation data obtained in principal components analyses, investigation of the correlation matrix and in a multiple regression model of total AUDIT score were also supportive of the online use of these measures. Evidence was weakest for the alcohol problems scale. CONCLUSIONS: A range of hazardous drinking measures exhibit sound psychometric properties when administered online. Further comparative study of the relationships between different measures is needed.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Alcohol-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Data Collection/statistics & numerical data , Online Systems/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adolescent Behavior/psychology , Adult , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Alcohol-Related Disorders/psychology , Alcoholism/diagnosis , Alcoholism/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection/methods , Data Collection/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Principal Component Analysis , Psychometrics , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...