Discontinuation of outpatient medications: implications for electronic messaging to pharmacies using CancelRx.

Electronic communication of prescription discontinuation, or CancelRx, has the potential to improve medication safety. We aimed to describe the proportion of discontinued outpatient medications that would result in a CancelRx message to understand its impact on medication safety. We used a data report to identify all outpatient medications discontinued in the electronic health record (EHR) of an academic health system in 1 month (October 2018). Among all 63 485 medications discontinued, 23 118 (36.4%) were e-prescribed, 25 982 (40.9%) were patient-reported or reconciled, and the remainder prescribed nonelectronically. Discontinued high-risk medications were more likely to be e-prescribed (2768 of 5896, 47.0%). A discontinuation reason was specified in 37 353 (58.9%) of all discontinued medications. Approximately one-third to one-half of discontinued medications were e-prescribed within the same EHR and would result in a CancelRx message to the pharmacy. Extension of this functionality to medications reconciled in the EHR could significantly expand the impact of CancelRx on medication safety. In addition, complete and accurate discontinuation reasons are needed to optimize CancelRx implementation.

The Impact of Electronic Communication of Medication Discontinuation (CancelRx) on Medication Safety: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of electronic communication of medication discontinuation from prescribers to pharmacies (CancelRx) on medication safety. METHODS: We used electronic health record (EHR) data to identify medications that were e-prescribed from a pilot practice to a health system pharmacy and subsequently discontinued before or after CancelRx implementation (January 16-April 15, 2018 versus 2019). We matched these EHR data to pharmacy management software data to identify medications that were sold to patients in the 6 months after discontinuation. As a surrogate for unintended cancellation, we also identified medications refilled within 120 days of discontinuation. We conducted a medical record review to identify documentation of prescriber intent to discontinue these medications. RESULTS: CancelRx implementation prevented prescriptions from being sold after discontinuation in the EHR (42 of 392 [10.7%] versus 0 of 387 [0.0%], P < 0.0001), but only 15 of 42 (35.7%) had documented intent to discontinue the medication (15 of 392, or 3.8% overall). There was a nonsignificant increase in the proportion of discontinued medications reordered within 120 days (10.0% versus 12.7%, P = 0.23). Medical record review of reordered prescriptions after CancelRx implementation found that 10 of 49 (10 of 387, or 2.6% overall) might have been unintentionally canceled. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of CancelRx eliminated the sale of e-prescribed medications after discontinuation in the EHR but might result in the unintentional cancellation of some prescriptions. Strategies to increase situational awareness of providers and pharmacy staff, including increased visibility of CancelRx, clear distinctions between active and expired prescriptions, and transmission of the reason for discontinuation, might reduce the risk of unintentional cancellations.

Understanding CancelRx: Results of End-to-End Functional Testing, Proactive Risk Assessment, and Pilot Implementation.

BACKGROUND: CancelRx allows prescribers to send electronic cancellation messages to pharmacies when medications are discontinued. Little is known about its functionality and impact on clinical workflows. OBJECTIVES: To understand CancelRx functionality, its potential impact on workflows and medication safety risks, and to develop mitigating strategies for risks introduced by implementation. METHODS: We conducted direct observations and semi-structured interviews to develop CancelRx use cases and assessed CancelRx in an end-to-end test environment, proactive risk assessment, and pilot implementation from April 16 to July 15, 2018. RESULTS: E-cancellations were sent upon discontinuation of e-prescriptions written within the electronic health record (EHR), but not other medications (e.g., printed prescriptions) and could be initiated by nonprescribers. In our proactive risk assessment, CancelRx implementation eliminated five of seven failure modes in outpatient prescribing to Johns Hopkins pharmacies, but introduced new risks, including (1) failure to act if an e-cancellation was not sent or was unsuccessful; (2) failure to cancel all prescriptions for a medication; (3) errors in manual matching; and (4) erroneous medication cancellations. We identified potential mitigation strategies for these risks. During pilot implementation, 92.4% (428/463) of e-cancellations had confirmed approval by the receiving pharmacy, while 4.5% (21/463) were denied, and 3.0% (14/463) had no e-cancellation response. Among e-cancellations received by the pilot pharmacy, 1.7% (7/408) required manual matching by pharmacy staff. Based on performance in testing, 73.4% (340/463) of completed e-cancellations would be expected to generate an in-basket message, including 21 (6.2%) denials and 319/340 (93.8%) approvals with a note from the pharmacy. CONCLUSION: CancelRx is an important functionality with the potential to decrease adverse events due to medication errors. However, changes in implementation in our EHR and pharmacy software and enhancements in the CancelRx standard are needed to maximize safety and usability. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of e-cancellation on medication safety.