Radiation and immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated pneumonitis risk stratification in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: role of functional lung radiomics?

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing chemoradiation and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience pulmonary toxicity at higher rates than historical reports. Identifying biomarkers beyond conventional clinical factors and radiation dosimetry is especially relevant in the modern cancer immunotherapy era. We investigated the role of novel functional lung radiomics, relative to functional lung dosimetry and clinical characteristics, for pneumonitis risk stratification in locally advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced NSCLC were prospectively enrolled on the FLARE-RT trial (NCT02773238). All received concurrent chemoradiation using functional lung avoidance planning, while approximately half received consolidation durvalumab ICI. Within tumour-subtracted lung regions, 110 radiomics features (size, shape, intensity, texture) were extracted on pre-treatment [99mTc]MAA SPECT/CT perfusion images using fixed-bin-width discretization. The performance of functional lung radiomics for pneumonitis (CTCAE v4 grade 2 or higher) risk stratification was benchmarked against previously reported lung dosimetric parameters and clinical risk factors. Multivariate least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox models of time-varying pneumonitis risk were constructed, and prediction performance was evaluated using optimism-adjusted concordance index (c-index) with 95% confidence interval reporting throughout. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included in the study and pneumonitis occurred in 16/39 (41%) patients. Among clinical characteristics and anatomic/functional lung dosimetry variables, only the presence of baseline chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was significantly associated with the development of pneumonitis (HR 4.59 [1.69-12.49]) and served as the primary prediction benchmark model (c-index 0.69 [0.59-0.80]). Discrimination of time-varying pneumonitis risk was numerically higher when combining COPD with perfused lung radiomics size (c-index 0.77 [0.65-0.88]) or shape feature classes (c-index 0.79 [0.66-0.91]) but did not reach statistical significance compared to benchmark models (p > 0.26). COPD was associated with perfused lung radiomics size features, including patients with larger lung volumes (AUC 0.75 [0.59-0.91]). Perfused lung radiomic texture features were correlated with lung volume (adj R2 = 0.84-1.00), representing surrogates rather than independent predictors of pneumonitis risk. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing chemoradiation with functional lung avoidance therapy and optional consolidative immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for locally advanced NSCLC, the strongest predictor of pneumonitis was the presence of baseline chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Results from this novel functional lung radiomics exploratory study can inform future validation studies to refine pneumonitis risk models following combinations of radiation and immunotherapy. Our results support functional lung radiomics as surrogates of COPD for non-invasive monitoring during and after treatment. Further study of clinical, dosimetric, and radiomic feature combinations for radiation and immune-mediated pneumonitis risk stratification in a larger patient population is warranted.

Reliability of Quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Biomarkers for Classifying Early Response to Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE OF THE REPORT: We evaluated the reliability of 18F-FDG PET imaging biomarkers to classify early response status across observers, scanners, and reconstruction algorithms in support of biologically adaptive radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer were prospectively enrolled on a phase 2 trial (NCT02773238) and underwent 18F-FDG PET on GE Discovery STE (DSTE) or GE Discovery MI (DMI) PET/CT systems at baseline and during the third week external beam radiation therapy regimens. All PET scans were reconstructed using OSEM; GE-DMI scans were also reconstructed with BSREM-TOF (block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm incorporating time of flight). Primary tumors were contoured by 3 observers using semiautomatic gradient-based segmentation. SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, MTV (metabolic tumor volume), and total lesion glycolysis were correlated with midtherapy multidisciplinary clinical response assessment. Dice similarity of contours and response classification areas under the curve were evaluated across observers, scanners, and reconstruction algorithms. LASSO logistic regression models were trained on DSTE PET patient data and independently tested on DMI PET patient data. RESULTS: Interobserver variability of PET contours was low for both OSEM and BSREM-TOF reconstructions; intraobserver variability between reconstructions was slightly higher. ΔSUVpeak was the most robust response predictor across observers and image reconstructions. LASSO models consistently selected ΔSUVpeak and ΔMTV as response predictors. Response classification models achieved high cross-validated performance on the DSTE cohort and more variable testing performance on the DMI cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The variability FDG PET lesion contours and imaging biomarkers was relatively low across observers, scanners, and reconstructions. Objective midtreatment PET response assessment may lead to improved precision of biologically adaptive radiation therapy.

Scanning Beam Proton Therapy versus Photon IMRT for Stage III Lung Cancer: Comparison of Dosimetry, Toxicity, and Outcomes.

PURPOSE: There are limited clinical data on scanning-beam proton therapy (SPT) in treating locally advanced lung cancer, as most published studies have used passive-scatter technology. There is increasing interest in whether the dosimetric advantages of SPT compared with photon therapy can translate into superior clinical outcomes. We present our experience of SPT and photon intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with clinical dosimetry and outcomes in patients with stage III lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with stage III lung cancer treated at our center between 2013 and May 2018 were identified in compliance with our institutional review board (64 patients = 34 SPT + 30 IMRT). Most proton patients were treated with pencil beam scanning (28 of 34), and 6 of 34 were treated with uniform scanning. Fisher exact test, χ2 test, and Mann-Whitney test were used to compare groups. All tests were 2-sided. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar between the IMRT and SPT patients, except for worse lung function in the IMRT group. Mean dose to lung, heart, and esophagus was lower in the SPT group, with most benefit in the low-dose region (lungs, 9.7 Gy vs 15.7 Gy for SPT vs IMRT, respectively [P = .004]; heart, 7 Gy vs 14 Gy [P = .001]; esophagus, 28.2 Gy vs 30.9 Gy [P = .023]). Esophagitis and dermatitis grades were not different between the 2 groups. Grade 2+ pneumonitis was 21% in the SPT group and 40% in the IMRT group (P = .107). Changes in blood counts were not different between the 2 groups. Overall survival and progression-free survival were not different between SPT and IMRT (median overall survival, 41.6 vs 30.7 months, respectively [P = .52]; median progression-free survival, 19.5 vs 14.6 months [P = .50]). CONCLUSIONS: We report our experience with SPT and IMRT in stage III lung cancer. Our cohort of patients treated with SPT had lower doses to normal organs (lungs, heart, esophagus) than our IMRT cohort. There was no statistically significant difference in toxicity rates or survival, although there may have been a trend toward lower rates of pneumonitis.