Predictive value of seminal oxidation-reduction potential analysis for reproductive outcomes of ICSI.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is seminal oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) clinically relevant to reproductive outcome? DESIGN: Prospective observational study including a total of 144 couples who had an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle between June 2018 and December 2020. The study included patients undergoing fresh ICSI cycles with autologous gametes. Cycles that had day 3 embryo transfers and cryopreservation cycles were excluded. There was no restriction on patients with severe male infertility; couples with unexplained infertility and unexplained male infertility were included, those with azoospermia were excluded. Semen analysis, seminal ORP as determined by means of the MiOXSYS system, sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) and reproductive outcomes (fertilization, blastocyst development, clinical pregnancy and live birth) were determined. RESULTS: Seminal ORP was significantly negatively correlated with fertilization rate (r = -0.267; P = 0.0012), blastocyst development rate (r = -0.432; P < 0.0001), implantation/clinical pregnancy (r = -0.305; P = 0.0003) and live birth (r = -0.366; P < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed significant predictive power for ORP for fertilization (≥80%; area under the curve [AUC] 0.652; P = 0.0012), blastocyst development rate (≥60%; AUC 0.794; P < 0.0001), implantation/clinical pregnancy (AUC 0.680; P = 0.0002) and live birth (AUC 0.728; P < 0.0001). Comparable results were obtained for SDF (fertilization: AUC 0.678; blastocyst development: AUC 0.777; implantation/clinical pregnancy: AUC 0.665; live birth: AUC 0.723). Normal sperm morphology showed the lowest predictive power for all reproductive outcome parameters. With male age as confounding factor, ORP (cut-off value of 0.51 mV/106 sperm/ml) has significant (P < 0.04667) effects on odds ratios for all reproductive outcome parameters. Multivariate logistic regression to investigate potential seminal and female confounding factors revealed that seminal ORP significantly (P < 0.0039; P < 0.0130) affects reproductive outcome. CONCLUSION: Seminal ORP is relevant for good fertilization, blastocyst development, implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tolvaptan monotherapy compared to furosemide and the combination of tolvaptan and furosemide in patients with heart failure and systolic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Increased vasopressin levels may be present in patient with chronic heart failure (HF) and contribute to pathophysiology through effects on the vasopressin V2 receptor. The presence of background diuretic therapy may confound evaluations of vasopressin receptor antagonists (VRA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Eligible patients had HF (New York Heart Association Class II-III), systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤0.40) and signs of congestion (eg, edema, rales). At screening, patients were removed from baseline diuretic therapy and placed on a low-sodium diet (2 g/day). After a 2-day run-in period, 83 patients were randomized to placebo (n = 21), monotherapy with the vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist tolvaptan (TLV) 30 mg (n = 20), monotherapy with furosemide 80 mg (FURO, n = 22) or both TLV 30 mg and FURO 80 mg (n = 20) once daily for 7 days. Patients were on standard background therapy and not fluid-restricted throughout the study. A decrease in body weight of -1.37 ± 1.61, -0.54 ± 1.59, and -1.13 ± 1.49 kg was observed versus baseline for TLV, FURO, and TLV+FURO, respectively, at day 8. At the same point, the placebo group showed a body weight increase of +0.72 ± 2.42 kg versus baseline (P = .0006 for TLV versus placebo). Increases in urine volume from baseline were greater with TLV alone (2646 ± 1503 mL/24 hours) than with FURO (894 ± 853 mL/24 hours, P < .001), or PLC (423 ± 786 mL/24 hours, P < .001), and similar to TLV+FURO (2585 ± 2119 mL/24 hours). An increase in serum sodium within the normal range was also observed in TLV-treated patients (P < .02 versus placebo; P < .01 versus FURO). No changes in serum potassium, other laboratory values, or blood pressure were observed. TLV therapy was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HF and signs of volume overload, TLV monotherapy without concomitant loop diuretic therapy reduced body weight when compared to placebo without adverse changes in serum electrolytes, during a sodium restricted diet while on background medications including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and ß-blockers.

Effects of BG9928, an adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, in patients with congestive heart failure.

Previous studies suggest that adenosine A1 receptor antagonists may promote natriuresis without deleterious effects on renal function. This study evaluated renal and hemodynamic effects as well as safety, pharmacokinetics, and tolerability of BG9928, a selective adenosine A1-receptor antagonist, in patients with heart failure. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study, 33 patients received a single dose of BG9928 (0.03, 0.3, 1.0, or 3.0 mg/kg) or placebo intravenously. Change from baseline in urinary sodium excretion for the 8-hour postdose interval was greater for all dosing groups versus placebo. The 0.03-mg/kg and 0.3-mg/kg groups had significant reductions in body weight versus placebo (-0.8 kg, -1.1 kg, 0.3 kg, respectively; P < 005). No changes in creatinine clearance or hemodynamic parameters were observed among any of the BG9928 groups versus placebo. However, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure tended to decrease and correlated with weight loss. Across the range of doses studied, pharmacokinetic parameters were linear and predictable. One patient who received the highest dose (3.0 mg/kg) developed seizures, and no further patients received that dose. Single intravenous BG9928 doses of up to 1.0 mg/kg were well tolerated and increased sodium excretion without worsening renal function. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical benefit of adenosine A1 receptor antagonism.

Effects of multiple oral doses of an A1 adenosine antagonist, BG9928, in patients with heart failure: results of a placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of oral BG9928 in heart failure (HF) patients. BACKGROUND: Declining renal function during HF treatment is associated with poor outcomes. BG9928, a selective inhibitor of the A1 adenosine receptor, is proposed to cause natriuresis without causing a decline in renal function. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in patients with HF and systolic dysfunction who were receiving standard therapy. Patients were randomized to receive BG9928 (3, 15, 75, or 225 mg) or placebo orally for 10 days. The primary end point was change in sodium excretion. Changes in potassium excretion, creatinine clearance, and body weight also were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were studied. BG9928 increased sodium excretion compared with placebo, and natriuresis was maintained over 10 days with little kaliuresis. A linear trend in dose response was observed on day 1 (p = 0.04) but not on days 6 or 10. Adjusted creatinine clearance was unchanged over the 10 days. Patients who received 15, 75, or 225 mg of BG9928 had a reduction in body weight compared with placebo (-0.6, -0.7, -0.5, vs. +0.3 kg, respectively) at the end of study. BG9928 was well tolerated. The pharmacokinetic profile of BG9928 was consistent with once-daily dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Oral BG9928 over the dose range of 3 to 225 mg/day produced significant increases in sodium excretion in patients with stable HF without causing kaliuresis or reducing renal function.

BG9719 (CVT-124), an A1 adenosine receptor antagonist, protects against the decline in renal function observed with diuretic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Adenosine may adversely affect renal function via its effects on renal arterioles and tubuloglomerular feedback, but effects of adenosine blockade in humans receiving furosemide and ACE inhibitors is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a randomized, double-blind, ascending-dose, crossover study evaluating 3 doses of BG9719 in 63 patients with congestive heart failure. Patients received placebo or 1 of 3 doses of BG9719 on 1 day and the same medication plus furosemide on a separate day. Renal function and electrolyte and water excretion were assessed. BG9719 alone caused an increase in urine output and sodium excretion (P<0.05). Although administration of furosemide alone caused a large diuresis, addition of BG9719 to furosemide increased diuresis, which was significant at the 0.75-microg/mL concentration. BG9719 alone improved glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at the 2 lower doses. Furosemide alone caused a decline in GFR. When BG9719 was added to furosemide, however, creatinine clearance remained at baseline at the 2 lower doses. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with congestive heart failure on standard therapy, including ACE inhibitors, BG9719 increased both urine output and GFR. In these same patients, furosemide increased urine output at the expense of decreased GFR. When BG9719 was given in addition to furosemide, urine volume additionally increased and there was no deterioration in GFR. A1 adenosine antagonism might preserve renal function while simultaneously promoting natriuresis during treatment for heart failure.