Mitral annular peak systolic and diastolic velocities are characteristic of healthy hearts: A Doppler tissue imaging study.

INTRODUCTION: Although systolic and diastolic dysfunction must coexist, they are most often considered in isolation. Therefore, a simple and reproducible quantitative measurement that integrates systolic and diastolic function is desirable. We hypothesize that the absolute sum of lateral mitral annular systolic and early diastolic peak velocities is predictive of overall cardiac function. METHODS: In this study, lateral mitral annular systolic (S') and early diastolic (E') peak velocities were measured in healthy subjects and compared against subjects with progressive degrees of systolic and diastolic dysfunction. RESULTS: A total of 149 subjects (56% male, mean age 48 years) were enrolled and stratified according to global left ventricular function: 76 normal, 40 mild-moderate dysfunction, and 33 moderate-severe dysfunction. Adjusting for baseline differences including age, univariate analysis showed mean S' + E' values were significantly different between subjects with normal, mild-moderate, and moderate-severe global left ventricular function (27, 17, 13 cm/s; P < 0.001 for all comparisons). The absolute sum of S' + E' ≥ 20 cm/s identified normal global left ventricular function with a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 85%, and ROC area under the curve of 0.924. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of subjects with varying levels of combined systolic and diastolic function, the easily obtainable composite score of S' + E' ≥ 20 cm/s is strongly predictive of normal global left ventricular function with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity. Additional studies should be considered to expand this concept to additional populations.

Association of Left Atrial Function Index with Atrial Fibrillation and Cardiovascular Disease: The Framingham Offspring Study.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) size, a marker of atrial structural remodeling, is associated with increased risk for atrial fibrillation (AF) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). LA function may also relate to AF and CVD, irrespective of LA structure. We tested the hypothesis that LA function index (LAFI), an echocardiographic index of LA structure and function, may better characterize adverse LA remodeling and predict incident AF and CVD than existing measures. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 1786 Framingham Offspring Study eighth examination participants (mean age, 66±9 years; 53% women), we related LA diameter and LAFI (derived from the LA emptying fraction, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral, and indexed maximal LA volume) to incidence of AF and CVD on follow-up. Over a median follow-up of 8.3 years (range, 7.5-9.1 years), 145 participants developed AF and 139 developed CVD. Mean LAFI was 34.5±12.7. In adjusted Cox regression models, lower LAFI was associated with higher risk of incident AF (hazard ratio=3.83, 95% confidence interval=2.23-6.59, lowest [Q1] compared with highest [Q4] LAFI quartile) and over 2-fold higher risk of incident CVD (hazard ratio=2.20, 95% confidence interval=1.32-3.68, Q1 versus Q4). Addition of LAFI, indexed maximum LA volume, or LA diameter to prediction models for AF or CVD did not significantly improve model discrimination for either outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In our prospective investigation of a moderate-sized community-based sample, LAFI, a composite measure of LA size and function, was associated with incident AF and CVD. Addition of LAFI to the risk prediction models for AF or CVD, however, did not significantly improve their performance.

Clinical and Echocardiographic Correlates of Left Atrial Function Index: The Framingham Offspring Study.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) remodeling is a predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We performed measurement of the LA function index (LAFI), a composite measure of LA structure and function, in a community-based cohort and here report the distribution and cross-sectional correlates of LAFI. METHODS: In 1,719 Framingham Offspring Study participants (54% women, mean age 66 ± 9 years), we derived LAFI from the LA emptying fraction, left ventricular (LV) outflow tract velocity time integral, and indexed maximal LA volume. We used multivariable linear regression to assess the clinical and echocardiographic correlates of LAFI adjusting for age, sex, anthropometric measurements, and CVD risk factors. RESULTS: The average LAFI was 35.2 ± 12.1. Overall, LAFI declined with advancing age (ß = -0.27, P < .001). LAFI was significantly higher (37.5 ± 11.6) in a subgroup of participants free of CVD and CVD risk factors compared with those with either of these conditions (34.5 ± 12.2). In multivariable models, LAFI was inversely related to antihypertensive use (ß = -1.26, P = .038), prevalent atrial fibrillation (ß = -4.46, P = .001), heart failure (ß = -5.86, P = .008), and coronary artery disease (ß = -2.01, P = .046). In models adjusting for echocardiographic variables, LAFI was directly related to LV ejection fraction (ß = 14.84, P < .001) and inversely related to LV volume (ß = -7.03, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: LAFI was inversely associated with antihypertensive use and prevalent CVD and was related to established echocardiographic traits of LV remodeling. Our results offer normative ranges for LAFI in a white community-based sample and suggest that LAFI represents a marker of pathological atrial remodeling.