[Early surgery or a wait-and-see policy in lumbosacral radicular syndrome: a randomized study]. / Vroeg opereren of langer afwachten voor het lumbosacraal radiculair syndroom: een gerandomiseerd onderzoek.

OBJECTIVE: To compare early surgery with expectative policy and later surgery if necessary in patients with sciatica that did not resolve within 6 weeks. DESIGN: Randomized multicentre clinical trial (ISRCTN 26872154). METHODS: Patients who had had severe sciatica for 6 to 12 weeks were randomized to early surgery or to prolonged conservative treatment with later surgery if necessary. The primary outcomes were the Roland Disability Questionnaire score, the visual-analogue scale for leg pain score, and the patient's report of their perceived recovery over the first year after randomization. Repeated measures analysis according to the intention-to-treat principle was used to analyse the outcome curves for both groups. RESULTS: A total of 283 patients were included and randomized. Of 141 patients assigned to undergo early surgery, 125 (89%) underwent microdiscectomy after a mean of 2.2 weeks. Of 142 patients assigned to conservative treatment, 55 (39%) still had to undergo surgical treatment after a mean of 18.7 weeks. There was no significant overall difference in disability scores during the first year (p = 0.13). Leg pain lessened more quickly in patients assigned to early surgery (p < 0.001). Patients assigned to early surgery also reported a faster rate of perceived recovery (hazard ratio (HR): 1.97; 95% CI: 1.72-2.22; p < 0.001). In both groups, however, the probability of perceived recovery after 1 year of follow-up was 95%. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year outcomes were similar for patients assigned to early surgery and those assigned to extended conservative treatment with later surgery if necessary but the rates of reduction of leg pain and of perceived recovery were faster in those assigned to early surgery.

Adhesion and proliferation of human Schwann cells on adhesive coatings.

Attachment to and proliferation on the substrate are deemed important considerations when Schwann cells (SCs) are to be seeded in synthetic nerve grafts. Attachment is a prerequisite for the SCs to survive and fast proliferation will yield large numbers of SCs in a short time, which appears promising for stimulation of peripheral nerve regeneration. The aim of the present study was to compare the adhesion and proliferation of human Schwann cells (HSCs) on different substrates. The following were selected for their suitability as an internal coating of synthetic nerve grafts; the extracellular matrix proteins fibronectin, laminin and collagen type I and the poly-electrolytes poly(d-lysine) (PDL) and poly(ethylene-imine) (PEI). On all coatings, attachment of HSCs was satisfactory and comparable, indicating that this factor is not a major consideration in choosing a suitable coating. Proliferation was best on fibronectin, laminin and PDL, and worst on collagen type I and PEI. Since nerve regeneration is enhanced by laminin and/or fibronectin, these are preferred as coatings for synthetic nerve grafts seeded with SCs.

The value of temporary external lumbar CSF drainage in predicting the outcome of shunting on normal pressure hydrocephalus.

OBJECTIVE: It has been reported that temporary external lumbar CSF drainage (ELD) is a very accurate test for predicting the outcome after ventricular shunting in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). However, only a limited number of patients have been studied for assessing the predictive accuracy of ELD. Therefore, the value of ELD in predicting the outcome after a ventriculoperitoneal shunt in patients with presumed NPH was assessed. METHODS: All patients with presumed NPH were invited to participate in this study. Clinical assessment, MRI, and neuropsychological evaluation were followed by a lumbar CSF tap test consisting of removing 40 ml CSF. When this test resulted in marked clinical improvement of gait impairment, mental disturbances, or both, the patient was shunted without further tests. In patients with either questionable or no improvement after the CSF tap test, ELD was carried out. The value of ELD for predicting the outcome after shunting was calculated by correlating the results of ELD with that of ventriculoperitoneal shunting. RESULTS: Between January 1994 and December 2000, 49 presumed NPH patients from three institutes were included. Forty three had idiopathic, and the remaining six had secondary NPH. Forty eight patients were shunted; 39 had an ELD of whom 38 completed the test. After 2 months 35 of the 48 (73%) shunted patients had improved. The predictive value of a positive ELD was 87% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 62-98) and that of a negative ELD 36% (95% CI 17-59). In two patients serious test related complications (meningitis) occurred without residual deficit. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that although the predictive value of a positive ELD is high, that of a negative ELD is deceptively low because of the high rate of false negative results. The costs and invasiveness of the test and the possibility of serious test related complications further limits its usefulness in managing patients with presumed NPH.