ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Due to the demanding nature of their profession, nurses are at risk of experiencing irregular sleep patterns, substance use, and fatigue. Evidence supports a reciprocal relationship between alcohol use and sleep disturbances; however, no research has examined such a link in a sample of nurses. One factor that may further impact the dynamic between alcohol and sleep patterns is posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. We investigated the daily bidirectional associations between alcohol use and several sleep domains (i.e., self-report and actigraphy-determined sleep), and moderation by baseline PTSD symptom severity. METHOD: Over a 14-day period, 392 nurses (92% female; 78% White) completed sleep diaries and actigraphy to assess alcohol use and sleep patterns. Within-person bidirectional associations between alcohol and sleep were examined using multilevel models, with symptoms of PTSD as a cross-level moderator. RESULTS: Daily alcohol use (i.e., ≥ 1 alcoholic beverage; 25.76%) was associated with shorter self-reported sleep onset latency (b = -4.21, p = .003) but longer self-reported wake after sleep onset (b = 2.36, p = .009). Additionally, days with any alcohol use were associated with longer self-reported sleep duration (b = 15.60, p = .006) and actigraphy-determined sleep duration (b = 10.06, p = .037). No sleep variables were associated with next-day alcohol use. Bidirectional associations between alcohol consumption and sleep were similar regardless of baseline PTSD symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that on days when nurses drank alcohol, they experienced longer but also more fragmented sleep.
ABSTRACT
As health care costs continue to escalate, cost control measures will likely become unavoidable and painful. One approach is to engage external forces to allocate resources--for example, through managed care or outright rationing. Another approach is to engage consumers to make their own allocation decisions, through "self-rationing," wherein they are given greater awareness, control, and hence responsibility for their health care spending. Steadily gaining popularity in this context is the concept of "consumer directed health care" (CDHC), which is envisioned to both control cost and enhance choice, by combining financial incentives with information to help consumers make more informed health care decisions and to appreciate the economic trade-offs of those decisions. While CDHC is gaining attention in the popular press, business publications, and academic journals, it is not without controversy about its relative merits and demerits. CDHC raises questions regarding the ethical limits of consumer responsibility for their choices. While the emphasis on consumer choice implies that autonomy is the ruling ethical principle in CDHC, it must be tempered by justice and beneficence. Justice must temper autonomy to protect disadvantaged populations from further widening disparities in health care access and outcomes that could arise from health care reform efforts. Beneficence must temper autonomy to protect consumers from unintended consequences of uninformed decisions. Thoughtful paternalism suggests that CDHC plans offer choices that are comprehensible to lay consumers, limited in their range of options, and carefully structured with default rules that minimize potential error costs.
