The impact of patient-controlled hospital admissions among patients with severe mental disorders on health care cost: A nationwide register-based cohort study using quasi-experimental design.

To assess whether patient-controlled admissions (PCA) to psychiatric hospital wards have an effect on total health care costs in the short term and longer term compared with patients receiving treatment as usual (TAU). Based on Danish register data and using coarsened exact matching, patients who signed a contract for PCA during 2013-2016 were matched on observables with a control group of TAU patients identified from psychiatric registers. As primary outcome patients' expenditure was explored in 6-monthly intervals over the first 12 months, and as secondary outcome over the 12-24 month period after index month. To control for unobservable selection a quasi-experimental difference-in-difference design was applied on the matched population using the principle of intention to treat. 414 PCA patients (out of 423 available) were successfully matched with 7181 never exposed TAU patients (out of 67,331 available). Total healthcare costs for PCA patients were €8887 (95% CI 708-17,067) higher per month than unexposed TAU patients in the first six months after index. Monthly psychiatric costs were €8922 (95% CI 708-17,067) higher for PCA patients than for TAU patients. These differences persisted, in the next three six-monthly periods, albeit were not statistically significant, in the second six-monthly period after index. In conclusion, driven by the psychiatric costs, implementing PCA increased the total healthcare costs in the short term compared with TAU. More research of the impact on health care costs in a broader and long-term perspective is still needed.

Patient-controlled hospital admission for patients with severe mental disorders: study protocol for a nationwide prospective multicentre study.

INTRODUCTION: Patient-controlled hospital admission for individuals with severe mental disorders is a novel approach in mental healthcare. Patients can admit themselves to a hospital unit for a short stay without being assessed by a psychiatrist or contacting the emergency department. Previous studies assessing the outcomes of patient-controlled hospital admission found trends towards reduction in the use of coercive measures and length of hospital stay; however, these studies have methodological shortcomings and small sample sizes. Larger studies are needed to estimate the effect of patient-controlled hospital admission on the use of coercion and of healthcare services. DESIGN AND METHODS: We aim to recruit at least 315 patients who are offered a contract for patient-controlled hospital admissions in eight different hospitals in Denmark. Patients will be followed-up for at least 1 year to compare the use of coercive measures and of healthcare services, the use of medications and suicidal behaviour. Descriptive statistics will be used to investigate hospitalisations, global assessment of functioning (GAF) and patient satisfaction with treatment. To minimise selection bias, we will match individuals using patient-controlled hospital admission and controls with a 1:5 ratio via a propensity score based on the following factors: sex, age group, primary diagnosis, substance abuse as secondary diagnosis, coercion, number of psychiatric bed days, psychiatric history, urbanity and suicidal behaviour. Additionally, a historical control study will be undertaken in which patients serve as their own control group prior to index date. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by The Danish Health and Medicines Authority (j.nr.: 3-3013-934/1/) and by The Danish Data Protection Agency (j.nr.: 2012-58-0004). The study was categorised as a register study by The Danish Health Research Ethics Committee and therefore no further approval was needed (j.nr.: H-2-2014-FSP70). Findings will be disseminated through scientific publications, presentations and in a PhD thesis.