The Effects of Serum Removal on Gene Expression and Morphological Plasticity Markers in Differentiated SH-SY5Y Cells.

Despite the widespread use of the SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell line in modeling human neurons in vitro, protocols for growth, differentiation and experimentation differ considerably across the literature. Many studies fully differentiate SH-SY5Y cells before experimentation, to investigate plasticity measures in a mature, human neuronal-like cell model. Prior to experimentation, serum is often removed from cell culture media, to arrest the cell growth cycle and synchronize cells. However, the exact effect of this serum removal before experimentation on mature, differentiated SH-SY5Y cells has not yet been described. In studies using differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, any effect of serum removal on plasticity markers may influence results. The aim of the current study was to systematically characterize, in differentiated, neuronal-like SH-SY5Y cells, the potentially confounding effects of complete serum removal in terms of morphological and gene expression markers of plasticity. We measured changes in commonly used morphological markers and in genes related to neuroplasticity and synaptogenesis, particularly in the BDNF-TrkB signaling pathway. We found that complete serum removal from already differentiated SH-SY5Y cells increases neurite length, neurite branching, and the proportion of cells with a primary neurite, as well as proportion of ßIII-Tubulin and MAP2 expressing cells. Gene expression results also indicate increased expression of PSD95 and NTRK2 expression 24 h after serum removal. We conclude that serum deprivation in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells affects morphology and gene expression and can potentially confound plasticity-related outcome measures, having significant implications for experimental design in studies using differentiated SH-SY5Y cells as a model of human neurons.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Plasticity Mechanisms: TMS-Related Gene Expression and Morphology Changes in a Human Neuron-Like Cell Model.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, used to alter cortical excitability both in research and clinical applications. The intermittent and continuous Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS and cTBS) protocols have been shown to induce opposite after-effects on human cortex excitability. Animal studies have implicated synaptic plasticity mechanisms long-term potentiation (LTP, for iTBS) and depression (LTD, for cTBS). However, the neural basis of TMS effects has not yet been studied in human neuronal cells, in particular at the level of gene expression and synaptogenesis. To investigate responses to TBS in living human neurons, we differentiated human SH-SY5Y cells toward a mature neural phenotype, and stimulated them with iTBS, cTBS, or sham (placebo) TBS. Changes in (a) mRNA expression of a set of target genes (previously associated with synaptic plasticity), and (b) morphological parameters of neurite outgrowth following TBS were quantified. We found no general effects of stimulation condition or time on gene expression, though we did observe a significantly enhanced expression of plasticity genes NTRK2 and MAPK9 24 h after iTBS as compared to sham TBS. This specific effect provides unique support for the widely assumed plasticity mechanisms underlying iTBS effects on human cortex excitability. In addition to this protocol-specific increase in plasticity gene expression 24 h after iTBS stimulation, we establish the feasibility of stimulating living human neuron with TBS, and the importance of moving to more complex human in vitro models to understand the underlying plasticity mechanisms of TBS stimulation.

The (non-)replicability of regulatory resource depletion: A field report employing non-invasive brain stimulation.

Cognitive effort and self-control are exhausting. Although evidence is ambiguous, behavioural studies have repeatedly suggested that control-demanding tasks seem to deplete a limited cache of self-regulatory resources leading to performance degradations and fatigue. While resource depletion has indirectly been associated with a decline in right prefrontal cortex capacity, its precise neural underpinnings have not yet been revealed. This study consisted of two independent experiments, which set out to investigate the causal role of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in a classic dual phase depletion paradigm employing non-invasive brain stimulation. In Experiment 1 we demonstrated a general depletion effect, which was significantly eliminated by anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to the right DLPFC. In Experiment 2, however, we failed to replicate the basic psychological depletion effect within a second independent sample. The dissimilar results are discussed in the context of the current 'replication crisis' and suggestions for future studies are offered. While our current results do not allow us to firmly argue for or against the existence of resource depletion, we outline why it is crucial to further clarify which specific external and internal circumstances lead to limited replicability of the described effect. We showcase and discuss the current inter-lab replication problem based on two independent samples tested within one research group (intra-lab).