Financial Analysis of Free Lung Cancer Screening Program Shows Profitability Using Broader NCCN Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) chest scans in high-risk populations has been established as an effective measure of preventive medicine by the National Lung Screening Trial. However, the sustainability of funding a program is still controversial. We present a 2.5-year profitability analysis of our screening program by using the broader National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on the initial 2.5-year data set of a free LDCT chest scan program that targeted the underserved Southeastern United States. Patients were selected by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk criteria, screening twice as many patients compared with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services criteria. LDCT scans were performed during the off-service hours of our positron emission tomography CT scanner. Analysis of fiscal years 2015 to 2017 was done to evaluate indirect cost, direct cost, and adjusted net margin per case after factoring downstream revenue from positive scans and other findings. RESULTS: A total of 705 scans were performed with 418 patients referred for subsequent procedures or specialist evaluations. The mean overhead cost over total cost was 42.3%. The adjusted net margin per case was -$212 in the first year but turned positive to $177 in the third fiscal year. The total break-even point of adjusted net margin was between 6% and 7% of indirect cost as a function of charges. Of the 60 new patients introduced to the hospital system, a gross margin per case of $211 was found. CONCLUSIONS: Free lung cancer screening can demonstrate profitability from downstream revenue with a lag time of 2 years.

Egg-and-Banana Sign: A Novel Diagnostic CT Marker for Pulmonary Hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively determine whether the egg-and-banana sign, defined as the visualization of the main pulmonary artery (PA) at the level of the aortic arch, is a sensitive and specific diagnostic marker for pulmonary hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 186 patients who, between January 2014 and July 2017, received right heart catheterizations and underwent CT studies that included the aortic arch within 140 days of catheterization were evaluated in this retrospective study. Of these patients, 127 had pulmonary hypertension (PH), and 59 who did not have PH served as control subjects. Two blinded radiologists reviewed each study for the egg-and-banana sign. The diameters of the main PA and ascending aorta were also measured. Contingency tables, ROC curves, and a t test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The egg-and-banana sign was associated with a higher mean PA pressure, a higher ratio of the diameter of the PA to the diameter of the ascending aorta (Ao) (hereafter referred to as the "PA-to-Ao ratio"), and a larger PA diameter (p < 0.006). It had a specificity of 85% and a positive predictive value of 85%. When the egg-and-banana sign was used in combination with a main PA diameter larger than 29 mm and a PA-to-Ao ratio greater than 1, its specificity increased to 91% and 93%, respectively. When considered as individual markers, the PA diameter had a high sensitivity (80%; AUC value, 0.74) and the PA-to-Ao ratio had a high specificity (81%; AUC value, 0.73) for PH. Moderate correlations were noted between PA pressure and PA diameter (r = 0.37) and between PA pressure and PA-to-Ao ratio (r = 0.43). CONCLUSION: The egg-and-banana sign has a high specificity and PPV for PH. Specificity increased when the sign was used in combination with other classic CT markers.

Free Lung Cancer Screening Trends Toward a Twofold Increase in Lung Cancer Prevalence in the Underserved Southeastern United States.

OBJECTIVES: The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) reported that the prevalence of lung cancer in individuals at high risk for the disease is 1%, and that screening these individuals using low-dose helical computed tomography of the chest saves lives. To increase screening accessibility in the underserved southeastern United States, we developed a free lung screening program, modeled after the Lahey Hospital & Medical Center Free Lung Screening Program, for individuals meeting National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk criteria. METHODS: This was a chart review of 264 participants screened in the first year of our program. Participants were divided into categories based on the Lung Imaging Reporting and Diagnostic System. Categories three and four were considered positive findings, with demographic and disease criteria collected on these patients. RESULTS: Of 264 participants screened, 28 (10.6%) were Lung Imaging Reporting and Diagnostic System category four, 23 (8.7%) were category three, 78 (29.5%) were category two, and 135 (51.1%) were category one. Eight of the 264 participants (3.0%) had lung cancer, with 75% detected in early stages. CONCLUSIONS: We found a lung cancer prevalence in our high-risk screened population of 3.0% (8 of 264). After adjusting for patients who were symptomatic on clinical evaluation, we report a prevalence of cancer at 2.2% compared with 1.1% in the first year of the National Lung Screening Trial and a prevalence of 1.9% versus 0.6% compared with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria in the first 10 months at Lahey Hospital & Medical Center. This study justifies low-dose helical computed tomography screening in high-risk regions because lung cancer treatment before symptoms appear is more effective, and the prevalence of disease in the detectable preclinical phase is high.

Promising Approaches From Behavioral Economics to Improve Patient Lung Cancer Screening Decisions.

Lung cancer is a devastating disease, the deadliest form of cancer in the world and in the United States. As a consequence of CMS's determination to provide low-dose CT (LDCT) as a covered service for at-risk smokers, LDCT lung cancer screening is now a covered service for many at-risk patients that first requires counseling and shared clinical decision making, including discussions of the risks and benefits of LDCT screening. However, shared decision making fundamentally relies on the premise that with better information, patients will arrive at rational decisions that align with their preferences and values. Evidence from the field of behavioral economics offers many contrary viewpoints that take into account patient decision making biases and the role of the shared decision environment that can lead to flawed choices and that are particularly relevant to lung cancer screening and treatment. This article discusses some of the most relevant biases, and suggests incorporating such knowledge into screening and treatment guidelines and shared decision making best practices to increase the likelihood that such efforts will produce their desired objectives to improve survival and quality of life.

Transformation and Transformational Leadership: A Review of the Current and Relevant Literature for Academic Radiologists.

With the US healthcare system on an unsustainable course, change is inevitable. Changes in the healthcare landscape impacting radiology include changing payment models, rapid adoption of digital technology, changes in radiology resident certifying exams, and the rise of consumerism in health care. Academic Radiology will be part of that change with none of its missions spared. What matters is not that change is coming but how Academic Radiology responds to change. Do we ignore, adapt, adopt others' practices, or lead change? Change management or transformation is a management skill set that can be learned and developed. Transformational leadership is a leadership style defined by the relationships between the leaders and the followers and the results they are able to achieve together to meet organizational goals. In this paper, we provide a review of key change management theories, as well as practical advice for self-reflection and development of leadership behaviors that promote effective change management and organizational transformation, particularly in a complex industry like Academic Radiology.

Talar Fractures and Dislocations: A Radiologist's Guide to Timely Diagnosis and Classification.

The talus, the second largest tarsal bone, has distinctive imaging characteristics and injury patterns. The predominantly extraosseous vascular supply of the talus predisposes it to significant injury in the setting of trauma. In addition, the lack of muscular attachments and absence of a secondary blood supply can lead to subsequent osteonecrosis. Although talar fractures account for less than 1% of all fractures, they commonly result from high-energy trauma and may lead to complications and long-term morbidity if not recognized and managed appropriately. While initial evaluation is with foot and ankle radiographs, computed tomography (CT) is often performed to evaluate the extent of the fracture, displacement, comminution, intra-articular extension, and associated injuries. Talar fractures are divided by anatomic region: head, neck, and body. Talar head fractures can be treated conservatively if nondisplaced, warranting careful radiographic and CT evaluation to assess rotation, displacement, and extension into the neck. The modified Hawkins-Canale classification of talar neck fractures is most commonly used due to its simplicity, usefulness in guiding treatment, and prognostic value, as it correlates associated malalignment with risk of subsequent osteonecrosis. Isolated talar body fractures may be more common than previously thought. The Sneppen classification further divides talar body fractures into osteochondral talar dome, lateral and posterior process, and shear and crush comminuted central body fractures. Crush comminuted central body fractures carry a poor prognosis due to nonanatomic reduction, bone loss, and subsequent osteonecrosis. Lateral process fractures can be radiographically occult and require a higher index of suspicion for successful diagnosis. Subtalar dislocations are often accompanied by fractures, necessitating postreduction CT. Familiarity with the unique talar anatomy and injury patterns is essential for radiologists to facilitate appropriate and timely management.

Radiology liability update: review of claims, trends, high-risk conditions and practices, and tort reform alternatives.

Radiology liability claims data are reviewed to explore the risk for suit and adverse judgments or settlements among radiologists, assess high-risk imaging conditions, and identify high-risk practice issues. Possible medical malpractice tort reform options are reviewed.