ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of hyaluronic acid (HLA) lip filler to correct subtle cleft lip asymmetries in adults using a validated patient reported outcome measure (PROM). DESIGN: Prospective cross sectional. SETTING: UK National Health Service. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Over 18 years old with repaired cleft lip and dissatisfaction of their lip appearance. INTERVENTIONS: HLA lip filler injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A validated, cleft specific PROM, the lip module of CLEFT-Q™ prior to treatment and again after six weeks. RESULTS: 24 patients included. A mean total CLEFT-Q™ score pre-procedure was 14.9 (Stand deviation (SD) = 4.91) and 24 (SD = 6.08) post-procedure. Difference in mean total score pre- and post-procedure were statically significant (P = .0001) in all domains on the CLEFT-Q™. No adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: HLA filler to correct subtle cleft lip asymmetries in adults is a simple low risk technique, which can significantly improve the patient's perception of lip appearance. CONCLUSION: HLA lip filler to correct subtle cleft lip asymmetries in adults is a simple technique, low risk procedure which can significantly improve the patient's perception of lip appearance.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Cleft rhinoplasty is a challenging procedure, with precision required to achieve good results. Cases often present with more complex structural and soft tissue asymmetries than non-cleft cases. Piezoelectric instrumentation uses ultrasonic vibrations to cut bone. At certain frequency, it will only cut bone, sparing soft tissue and is reported to decrease postoperative pain, oedema and echymosis. It allows nasal bony work to be performed under direct vision without losing stability of the bony fragments by preserving the underlying periosteum. There is good evidence on the use of piezoelectric instrumentation in cosmetic rhinoplasty; however, none to date has focused exclusively on cleft rhinoplasty. We present a single surgeon experience using piezoelectric instrumentation in cleft rhinoplasty. METHODS AND PATIENTS: We reviewed the case histories of 21 consecutive patients who had Piezo-assisted cleft rhinoplasty surgery between 2017 and 2021. We present our operative techniques and results of piezoelectric cleft rhinoplasty and compare it with 19 patients undergoing cleft rhinoplasty with conventional instrumentation over the same time period, by the same surgeon. RESULTS: Piezo-assisted rhinoplasty steps included bony osteotomies, dorsal hump removal, modification of composite cartilage/ ethmoid grafts and instrumentation of the anterior nasal spine. There were no significant complications and no revision surgeries. There was no difference in operative time compared to conventional instruments. CONCLUSION: Piezoelectric instrumentation is a valuable and efficient tool in cleft rhinoplasty. It offers potentially significant advantages in terms of the precision of bony work, whilst minimising trauma to the surrounding soft tissues.
