ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Catheter-related infections (CRIs) and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are among the most frequent hospital acquired infections. CRI/CRBSI studies in Scandinavian cohorts are scarce. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the CRI/CRBSI incidence and the association between potential risk factors, including the introduction of a simple hygiene insertion bundle and CRIs at a large university hospital in Sweden. METHODS: We retrospectively included all patients aged 12 and above who received a central venous catheter (CVC) or a central dialysis catheter during a 2-year period, 1 year before and 1 year after the implementation of a simple hygiene insertion bundle. Microbiological data, including catheter tip cultures and blood cultures, were merged with CVC insertion data. RESULTS: A total of 1722 catheter insertions in 1428 patients were included. CRI and CRBSI incidence were 1.86/1000 and 0.62/1000 catheter days, respectively. In a multivariable regression model, the implementation of a simple hygiene insertion bundle was the independent factor most strongly associated with significantly lower CRI-incidence (95% confidence interval [CI] of odds ratio [OR] 0.23-0.92, P = .029). Choosing multiple lumen catheters was associated with increasing CRI-incidence (95% CI of OR 1.11-2.39, P = .013). CONCLUSION: The incidence of catheter-related infections and catheter-related bloodstream infections in this Scandinavian cohort was low. The implementation of a simple hygiene insertion bundle seems to be an effective intervention for reducing catheter-related infections. The use of multiple-lumen catheters is associated with increased risk of catheter-related infections.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Child , Female , Humans , Hygiene , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolic disease is a serious and often fatal complication following hospital admission. Studies show that thromboprophylactic therapy for this condition is often underutilized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of thromboprophylactic therapy at Landspítali - The University Hospital of Iceland in adult patients admitted to acute wards. METHODS AND MATERIALS: On 2 December 2009 hospital charts of admitted patients on acute wards were reviewed and assessed for appropriate thromboprophylactic treatment according to the 2008 guidelines from The American College of Chest Physicians. The results were compared to those of other countries from the multinational Endorse study from 2008. RESULTS: 251 patient were included of whom 47% were considered at risk for venous thromboembolic disease. Of those 57% received appropriate thromboprophylactic treatment or 78% of surgical and 26% of medical patients. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to clinical guidelines for thromboprophylactic treatment at surgical wards of Landspítali - The National University Hospital of Iceland was good and well above the average compared to the results of the Endorse study. Performance on the medical wards was on the other hand below average. Our results show that application of thromoboprophylactic treatment at Landspítali could be improved and thereby enhance patient safety.
