Toxoplasma gondii exploits the host ESCRT machinery for parasite uptake of host cytosolic proteins.

Toxoplasma gondii is a master manipulator capable of effectively siphoning the resources from the host cell for its intracellular subsistence. However, the molecular underpinnings of how the parasite gains resources from its host remain largely unknown. Residing within a non-fusogenic parasitophorous vacuole (PV), the parasite must acquire resources across the limiting membrane of its replicative niche, which is decorated with parasite proteins including those secreted from dense granules. We discovered a role for the host Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport (ESCRT) machinery in host cytosolic protein uptake by T. gondii by disrupting host ESCRT function. We identified the transmembrane dense granule protein TgGRA14, which contains motifs homologous to the late domain motifs of HIV-1 Gag, as a candidate for the recruitment of the host ESCRT machinery to the PV membrane. Using an HIV-1 virus-like particle (VLP) release assay, we found that the motif-containing portion of TgGRA14 is sufficient to substitute for HIV-1 Gag late domain to mediate ESCRT-dependent VLP budding. We also show that TgGRA14 is proximal to and interacts with host ESCRT components and other dense granule proteins during infection. Furthermore, analysis of TgGRA14-deficient parasites revealed a marked reduction in ingestion of a host cytosolic protein compared to WT parasites. Thus, we propose a model in which T. gondii recruits the host ESCRT machinery to the PV where it can interact with TgGRA14 for the internalization of host cytosolic proteins across the PV membrane (PVM). These findings provide new insight into how T. gondii accesses contents of the host cytosol by exploiting a key pathway for vesicular budding and membrane scission.

Rendezvous at Plasma Membrane: Cellular Lipids and tRNA Set up Sites of HIV-1 Particle Assembly and Incorporation of Host Transmembrane Proteins.

The HIV-1 structural polyprotein Gag drives the virus particle assembly specifically at the plasma membrane (PM). During this process, the nascent virion incorporates specific subsets of cellular lipids and host membrane proteins, in addition to viral glycoproteins and viral genomic RNA. Gag binding to the PM is regulated by cellular factors, including PM-specific phospholipid PI(4,5)P2 and tRNAs, both of which bind the highly basic region in the matrix domain of Gag. In this article, we review our current understanding of the roles played by cellular lipids and tRNAs in specific localization of HIV-1 Gag to the PM. Furthermore, we examine the effects of PM-bound Gag on the organization of the PM bilayer and discuss how the reorganization of the PM at the virus assembly site potentially contributes to the enrichment of host transmembrane proteins in the HIV-1 particle. Since some of these host transmembrane proteins alter release, attachment, or infectivity of the nascent virions, the mechanism of Gag targeting to the PM and the nature of virus assembly sites have major implications in virus spread.

Relationships between MA-RNA Binding in Cells and Suppression of HIV-1 Gag Mislocalization to Intracellular Membranes.

The HIV-1 Gag matrix (MA) domain mediates the localization of Gag to the plasma membrane (PM), the site for infectious virion assembly. The MA highly basic region (MA-HBR) interacts with phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P2], a PM-specific acidic lipid. The MA-HBR also binds RNAs. To test whether acidic lipids alone determine PM-specific localization of Gag or whether MA-RNA binding also plays a role, we compared a panel of MA-HBR mutants that contain two types of substitutions at MA residues 25 and 26 or residues 29 and 31: Lys→Arg (KR) (25/26KR and 29/31KR) and Lys→Thr (KT) (25/26KT and 29/31KT). Consistent with the importance of the HBR charge in RNA binding, both KT mutants failed to bind RNA via MA efficiently, unlike the corresponding KR mutants. Both 25/26KT Gag-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) and 29/31KT Gag-YFP bound nonspecifically to the PM and intracellular membranes, presumably via the myristoyl moiety and remaining MA basic residues. In contrast, 25/26KR Gag-YFP bound specifically to the PM, suggesting a role for the total positive charge and/or MA-bound RNA in navigating Gag to the PM. Unlike 29/31KT Gag-YFP, 29/31KR Gag-YFP was predominantly cytosolic and showed little intracellular membrane binding despite having a higher HBR charge. Therefore, it is likely that MA-RNA binding blocks promiscuous Gag membrane binding in cells. Notably, the introduction of a heterologous multimerization domain restored PI(4,5)P2-dependent PM-specific localization for 29/31KR Gag-YFP, suggesting that the blocking of PM binding is more readily reversed than that of intracellular membrane binding. Altogether, these cell-based data support a model in which MA-RNA binding ensures PM-specific localization of Gag via suppression of nonspecific membrane binding.IMPORTANCE The PM-specific localization of HIV-1 Gag is a crucial early step in infectious progeny production. The interaction between the MA highly basic region (MA-HBR) of Gag and the PM-specific lipid PI(4,5)P2 is critical for Gag localization to the PM. Additionally, in vitro evidence has indicated that MA-RNA binding prevents nonspecific binding of Gag to non-PI(4,5)P2-containing membranes. However, cell-based evidence supporting a role for HIV-1 MA-RNA binding in PM-specific subcellular localization has been scarce; thus, it remained possible that in cells, just the high basic charge or the PI(4,5)P2 binding ability is sufficient for MA to direct Gag specifically to the PM. The present study reveals for the first time an excellent correlation between RNA binding of the MA-HBR and inhibition of promiscuous Gag localization, both within the cells, and thereby provides cell-based evidence supporting a mechanism in which HIV-1 MA binding to RNA ensures the specific localization of Gag to the PM.