Sensitivity of yeast strains with long G-tails to levels of telomere-bound telomerase.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pif1p helicase is a negative regulator of telomere length that acts by removing telomerase from chromosome ends. The catalytic subunit of yeast telomerase, Est2p, is telomere associated throughout most of the cell cycle, with peaks of association in both G1 phase (when telomerase is not active) and late S/G2 phase (when telomerase is active). The G1 association of Est2p requires a specific interaction between Ku and telomerase RNA. In mutants lacking this interaction, telomeres were longer in the absence of Pif1p than in the presence of wild-type PIF1, indicating that endogenous Pif1p inhibits the active S/G2 form of telomerase. Pif1p abundance was cell cycle regulated, low in G1 and early S phase and peaking late in the cell cycle. Low Pif1p abundance in G1 phase was anaphase-promoting complex dependent. Thus, endogenous Pif1p is unlikely to act on G1 bound Est2p. Overexpression of Pif1p from a non-cell cycle-regulated promoter dramatically reduced viability in five strains with impaired end protection (cdc13-1, yku80Delta, yku70Delta, yku80-1, and yku80-4), all of which have longer single-strand G-tails than wild-type cells. This reduced viability was suppressed by deleting the EXO1 gene, which encodes a nuclease that acts at compromised telomeres, suggesting that the removal of telomerase by Pif1p exposed telomeres to further C-strand degradation. Consistent with this interpretation, depletion of Pif1p, which increases the amount of telomere-bound telomerase, suppressed the temperature sensitivity of yku70Delta and cdc13-1 cells. Furthermore, eliminating the pathway that recruits Est2p to telomeres in G1 phase in a cdc13-1 strain also reduced viability. These data suggest that wild-type levels of telomere-bound telomerase are critical for the viability of strains whose telomeres are already susceptible to degradation.

Precise destruction: an emerging picture of the APC.

Cell cycle transitions are often accompanied by the degradation of regulatory molecules. Targeting proteins to the proteasome for degradation is accomplished by the covalent addition of ubiquitin chains. The specificity of this pathway is largely dictated by a set of enzymes called ubiquitin ligases (or E3s). The anaphase-promoting complex (or APC) is a ubiquitin ligase that has a particularly prominent role in regulating cell cycle progression. To date, the APC is the most complicated member of the RING/cullin family of multisubunit E3s. It includes at least 13 core subunits and three related adaptors. A combination of biochemical, genetic, and structural approaches are now shedding light on the enzymology of the APC. This review will focus on these data, drawing parallels with related ubiquitin ligases.

An architectural map of the anaphase-promoting complex.

The anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC) is an unusually complicated ubiquitin ligase, composed of 13 core subunits and either of two loosely associated regulatory subunits, Cdc20 and Cdh1. We analyzed the architecture of the APC using a recently constructed budding yeast strain that is viable in the absence of normally essential APC subunits. We found that the largest subunit, Apc1, serves as a scaffold that associates independently with two separable subcomplexes, one that contains Apc2 (Cullin), Apc11 (RING), and Doc1/Apc10, and another that contains the three TPR subunits (Cdc27, Cdc16, and Cdc23). We found that the three TPR subunits display a sequential binding dependency, with Cdc27 the most peripheral, Cdc23 the most internal, and Cdc16 between. Apc4, Apc5, Cdc23, and Apc1 associate interdependently, such that loss of any one subunit greatly reduces binding between the remaining three. Intriguingly, the cullin and TPR subunits both contribute to the binding of Cdh1 to the APC. Enzymatic assays performed with APC purified from strains lacking each of the essential subunits revealed that only cdc27Delta complexes retain detectable activity in the presence of Cdh1. This residual activity depends on the C-box domain of Cdh1, but not on the C-terminal IR domain, suggesting that the C-box mediates a productive interaction with an APC subunit other than Cdc27. We have also found that the IR domain of Cdc20 is dispensable for viability, suggesting that Cdc20 can activate the APC through another domain. We have provided an updated model for the subunit architecture of the APC.

Cycling without the cyclosome: modeling a yeast strain lacking the APC.

The construction of viable Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that lack the anaphase promoting complex (APC) was recently reported. The normally lethal deletions of APC genes were suppressed by the double deletion of the PDS1 and CLB5 genes in conjunction with the insertion of multiple copies of the SIC1 gene controlled by its endogenous promoter. It was proposed that cyclic expression and degradation of Sic1 results in oscillations of Clb/CDK activity necessary for the cell cycle. We have used an updated version of a mathematical model of the yeast cell cycle to model strains that lack the APC. With a few modifications, the model accurately simulates the viability of Apc- strains, as well as the phenotypes of 27 other previously characterized strains. We discuss a few minor inconsistencies between the model and experiment, and how these may inform future revisions to the model.

Securin and B-cyclin/CDK are the only essential targets of the APC.

The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC) is a highly conserved ubiquitin ligase that controls passage through the cell cycle by targeting many proteins for proteolysis. The complex is composed of at least thirteen core subunits, eight of which are essential, and two activating subunits, Cdc20 (essential) and Cdh1/Hct1 (non-essential). Previously, it was not known which APC targets are sufficient to explain the essential nature of the complex. Here, we show that each of the eight normally essential APC subunits is rendered non-essential ('bypass-suppressed') by the simultaneous removal/inhibition of the APC substrates securin (Pds1) and B-type cyclin/CDK (Clb/CDK). In strains lacking the APC, levels of Clb2 and Clb3 remain constant, but Clb/CDK activity oscillates as cells cycle. This suggests that in the absence of B-type cyclin destruction, oscillation of the Clb/CDK-inhibitor Sic1 is sufficient to trigger the feedback loops necessary for the bi-stable nature of Clb/CDK activity. These results strongly suggest that securin and B-type cyclin/CDK activity are the only obligatory targets of the APC in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.