Comparison of early plasma RNA loads in different macaque species and the impact of different routes of exposure on SIV/SHIV infection.

Various simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)sm/mac and simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) strains are used in different macaque species to study AIDS pathogenesis, as well as to evaluate candidate vaccine and anti-retroviral drugs efficacy. In this study we investigated the effect of route of infection, species of macaques and nature of virus stock on early plasma viral RNA load. We monitored the plasma RNA concentrations of 63 rhesus (Macaca mulatta) and cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) infected with well-characterised virus stocks administered either by oral, rectal, vaginal or intravenous (i.v.) routes. In SIV(mac)-infected macaques, no significant difference in plasma RNA loads was observed between the rectal, oral and i.v. routes of infection. Cynomolgus macaques developed lower steady state SIV plasma RNA concentrations compared with rhesus macaques and no significant difference was observed between rectal and i.v. routes of infection. In SHIV(89.6p)-infected macaques, no difference between species or between route of infection was observed with this particular chimeric virus.

Multi-center European evaluation of HIV testing on serum and saliva samples.

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the reliability of HIV antibody testing on saliva. DESIGN: matched serum and saliva samples were collected from both seronegative (n = 344) and seropositive (n = 125) individuals in five European countries. Duplicate saliva samples collected with Omni-Sal devices provided by Saliva Diagnostic System (SDS) were pooled before analysis. METHODS: all samples were analyzed by Recombinant HIV1 EIA Cambridge Bioscience and 2nd generation Abbott HIV 1&2 1A80. EIA procedures were adapted for saliva testing by modification of sample dilution and/or cut-off calculation. All saliva recording positive and/or doubtful EIA results were further analyzed by Western blot as a confirmatory method. RESULTS: EIA results obtained from sera analysis from both seropositives and seronegatives allowed for calculation of the tests' sensitivity (HIV1 Biotech: 99.2%-100%; Abbott: 100%) and specificity (both tests 100%). In the series of 125 saliva samples collected from seropositives, the EIA results were as follows: with Biotech (3 negative, 3 in the grey-zone and 119 reactive) and with Abbott (1 negative, 1 in the grey-zone and 123 reactive). One saliva sample found negative by both EIA tests, although fulfilling HIV1 WB criteria of positivity, was collected from an HIV2 infected person. Out of 125 saliva samples collected from seropositives, 121 produced positive Western Blot profiles, 4 were indeterminate and 1 was found negative whereas 125/125 sera were found positive. CONCLUSION: the reliability of HIV testing of saliva is dependent on the sensitivity of EIA tests and on the criteria used for the interpretation of Western blot tests as well. Although saliva testing offers numerous advantages for epidemiological purposes, it should not be recommended for diagnosis.