Biochemically Silent Pheochromocytoma in an Asymptomatic Patient With a Unilateral Lipid-Poor Adrenal Adenoma.

In this case, a Caucasian woman was incidentally found to have a left adrenal gland incidentaloma a decade ago. Initial tests indicated a non-functional lipid-poor adenoma, but ongoing surveillance revealed irregularities in biochemical testing for pheochromocytoma. The patient was concurrently taking an SNRI, known to elevate biochemical markers artificially. Given the adenoma's growth and mild biochemical abnormalities, laparoscopic surgery was performed, and the tumor was found to be a 2.4 cm × 1.8 cm pheochromocytoma. Following the procedure, hormone levels normalized, and the patient experienced relief from symptoms. This case underscores the rarity of pheochromocytomas, emphasizing the importance of accurate diagnosis and effective management. Imaging techniques, notably computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), played a crucial role in localization, particularly through contrast-enhanced methods. Key characteristics like Hounsfield density, enhancement patterns, and washout behavior aided in distinguishing diverse adrenal masses. For cases where imaging had limitations, complementary techniques such as 23I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy, specialized MR sequences, and GA-DOTATATE scans provided supplementary diagnostic insights, collectively contributing to a comprehensive clinical understanding. Despite advancements, challenges persist in differentiating specific adrenal tumors, highlighting the need for continued research and refined imaging methodologies.

COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance Among Rural Appalachian Healthcare Workers (Eastern Kentucky/West Virginia): A Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction The success of a vaccination program is dependent on vaccine efficacy and the number of people vaccinated. Healthcare workers are the first to receive the COVID-19 vaccine based on CDC phase 1a recommendations and are a point of contact for information for patients, so they must be well-educated on common misconceptions about the vaccine. Objective To identify acceptance/refusal rates of COVID-19 vaccine, reasons for refusal, and to understand the impact of demographics, work environment, and comorbidities on vaccine acceptance. Methods A cross-sectional study of 1076 healthcare employees in Rural Appalachian utilizing electronic and paper-based 12 question surveys from December 10, 2020, through December 20, 2020, followed up to April 2021. Results Within our study, 52.3% of our healthcare workers would accept vaccination with higher age, male gender, physicians, and those who receive annual flu vaccines more likely to accept vaccination. The most common reason for refusal was unknown side effects (88.5%). The second reason for refusal at 33.5% was waiting for someone else to take the vaccine first. In February 2021, the percentage of our healthcare workers who were vaccinated was 48%, which then increased to 55% in March 2021. By April 2021, the vaccination percentage of our healthcare workers reached 59%. Conclusions In order to predict how the public percentage of vaccination would be, healthcare workers need to address concerns about side effects from the vaccines and encourage the public to get the vaccines since healthcare workers themselves had already received the vaccines and can educate the patients on how they did after getting the shots.

Symptoms prior to sudden death.

BACKGROUND: Sudden death accounts for up to 15% of all deaths among working age adults. A better understanding of victims' medical care and symptoms reported at their last medical encounter may identify opportunities for interventions to prevent sudden deaths. METHODS: From 2013-15, all out-of-hospital deaths, ages 18-64 reported by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in Wake County, North Carolina were screened and adjudicated to identify 399 victims of sudden death, 264 of whom had available medical records. Demographic and clinical characteristics and prescribed medications were compared between victims with versus without a medical encounter within one month preceding death with chi-square tests and t-tests, as appropriate. Symptoms reported in medical encounters within one month preceding death were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 264 victims with available medical records, 73 (27.7%) had at least one encounter within a month preceding death. These victims were older and more likely to have multiple chronic illnesses, yet most were not prescribed evidence-based medicines. Of these 73 victims, 30 (41.1%) reported cardiac symptoms including dyspnea, edema, and chest pain. CONCLUSIONS: Many victims seek medical care and report cardiac symptoms in the month prior to sudden death. However, medications that might prevent sudden death are under prescribed. These findings suggest that there are opportunities for intervention to prevent sudden death.