Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Ment Health Clin ; 11(3): 211-219, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34026397

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The ketogenic diet (KD) is a high-fat, low-carbohydrate, and moderate-protein diet that has shown benefit as a treatment in neurologic disorders and may serve as a therapeutic option in individuals with psychiatric disorders. METHODS: A search was conducted using EBSCOhost and PubMed databases for studies relating to ketogenic or low-carbohydrate diets and psychiatric disorders. RESULTS: A total of 32 experimental or observational studies were identified by initial search strategies, 14 of which met the criteria to be included in this analysis. Although specific diet formulations varied somewhat between studies, they all generally examined low-carbohydrate dietary intake with the goal of producing a ketotic state. The studies included in this review indicated the KD was beneficial in reducing symptoms associated with various psychiatric disorders. DISCUSSION: This review summarizes the available evidence regarding the efficacy of the ketogenic diet in psychiatric disease states. Data from the studies analyzed demonstrated a positive response in individuals who were able to remain on the diet, regardless of the disease state. However, there is a need for more data to clearly define the specific benefits the KD may provide.

2.
Sr Care Pharm ; 36(2): 83-92, 2021 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33509331

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the available evidence for safety and efficacy of over-the-counter (OTC) sleep aids used for the treatment of insomnia in older people.
DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EBSCO, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts.
STUDY SELECTION: Five studies were included that involved humans 65 years of age and older being evaluated on OTC sleep aids in the outpatient setting.
DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction from each study included primary and secondary efficacy endpoints, such as differences in the mean total sleep time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, and number of awakenings, along with safety endpoints, such as psychomotor ability, cognitive ability, and adverse effect profiles. Both subjective and objective measures of changes in sleep and adverse effects were included.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Diphenhydramine had a statistically significant increase in sedation and decrease in number of awakenings but was not shown to be any less or more safe than compared products. Despite lacking safety issues, valerian was found to have no effect on subjective or objective sleep outcomes. Overall, melatonin had the most evidence and was found to have a statistically significant positive impact on sleep measures without safety issues.
CONCLUSION: Diphenhydramine and melatonin appear to be efficacious in improving some sleep measures while causing minimal adverse effects. However, there are very few studies that examine the use of over-the-counter sleep aids in those 65 years of age and older with primary insomnia. Additional studies are needed in this population.


Subject(s)
Diphenhydramine/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Melatonin/administration & dosage , Nonprescription Drugs , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Sleep Wake Disorders/drug therapy , Sleep/drug effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diphenhydramine/adverse effects , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Melatonin/adverse effects , Valerian
3.
Respir Care ; 62(7): 882-887, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28351904

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were: (1) to assess the prevalence of and types of education methods provided to participants who use a metered-dose inhaler (MDI), (2) to determine the prevalence of MDI misuse in adults using objective and subjective assessments, and (3) to determine whether any associations exist between the education method and the participant's ability to properly use an MDI. METHODS: Adult participants who had a current or previous history of MDI use were recruited from retail pharmacies and physician offices in Laurens County, South Carolina. Exclusion criteria included the use of an MDI spacer, inability to speak/understand English, or current acute respiratory illness. Participants completed a survey regarding inhaler use and previous education, a subjective checklist assessment by demonstrating use of an MDI, and an objective assessment by using the Aerosol Inhalation Monitor (AIM). RESULTS: Of 100 participants, 25% reported never having received education about inhaler technique, and 94% were found to have insufficient MDI technique. No association between the method of education and successful MDI technique with the AIM was identified (P = .31). Participants were less likely to correctly use the AIM if they missed >3 steps in the subjective assessment. (P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: Although most participants received inhaler education, inhaler misuse was very common. No associations were found regarding method of education and proper inhaler technique.


Subject(s)
Medication Errors/statistics & numerical data , Metered Dose Inhalers/statistics & numerical data , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Respiratory Insufficiency/drug therapy , Adult , Checklist , Female , Humans , Male , Medication Errors/psychology , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Respiratory Insufficiency/psychology , South Carolina , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 57(3): 402-406, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28285805

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Primary study objectives were to (1) describe mean change in A1c from baseline of a free clinic population enrolled in telehealth diabetes self-management education and support (DSME/S) services and (2) to compare change in A1C and other clinical outcomes measures with free clinic patients enrolled in a traditional face-to-face DSME/S program. METHODS: An exploratory study design and comparative evaluation of telehealth DSME/S services in a free clinic population was used. Baseline clinical measures were collected upon referral. Diabetes educators met with patients individually over 2-3 months. Clinical outcomes measures were collected within 6 months of program completion. Data from the telehealth group was assessed individually and compared to a free clinic traditional DSME/S program population. RESULTS: Twelve patients completed a telehealth free clinic DSME/S pilot program with a mean ± SD change in A1C from baseline of -1.03 ± 1.53% (P = 0.050). Mean ± SD change in A1C from baseline in the free clinic population participating in traditional face-to-face DSME/S services was -1.42 ± 1.80% (P = 0.001). No significant differences in secondary outcomes measures, including body mass index and blood pressure, were revealed among the study populations. CONCLUSION: Expanding access to care in populations faced with challenges of socioeconomics, limited education, and lower health literacy is a step toward reducing health disparities and positively affecting care. Mean A1C can be improved with telehealth DSME/S services in an underserved, free clinic population.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism , Self-Management/education , Self-Management/statistics & numerical data , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure/physiology , Body Mass Index , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Pilot Projects , Self Care/statistics & numerical data , Vulnerable Populations/statistics & numerical data
5.
Health Commun ; 31(6): 679-87, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26507669

ABSTRACT

Health literacy refers to the ability of a patient to obtain, communicate, process, and understand basic information related to health and services. It is estimated that the majority of adult Americans may have difficulty understanding health information. In addition, limited health literacy of patients is linked to over $100 billion in health care costs. Measurement of health literacy may aid in improving communication with patients, and thus to improving outcomes and decreasing costs. The Newest Vital Sign (NVS) is a tool that has been used to assess health literacy in a variety of patients. It has been validated against other measures including the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA). Patients are categorized as high likelihood of limited health literacy, possible limited health literacy, or adequate literacy. The NVS has been used in a variety of settings and tested among a wide range of patient groups. The most common setting for use is in primary care, probably due to the relatively quick assessment of health literacy (within 3 minutes). The NVS has been used in Caucasians, African Americans, Hispanics, and several other ethnicities. Assessment with the NVS has been conducted in adult patients across the age continuum, and with several different health conditions, including diabetes, kidney disease, and pain. This article seeks to review the published uses to date and to provide suggestions for potential uses of the NVS.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Literacy , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , United States , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...