Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Vet Intern Med ; 24(2): 426-30, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20102499

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Outbreak of bluetongue virus serotype-8 (BTV-8) infection in domestic ruminants in Northern Europe. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the South American camelids' (SAC) susceptibility to BTV-8 infection, their role in the epidemiology of the disease, and the use of currently available serological screening tests in SAC in an endemic region. ANIMALS: Three hundred and fifty-four unvaccinated and 27 vaccinated SAC (170 llamas, 201 alpacas), ranging in age from 1 month to 17 years between June and August 2008. The SAC originated from 44 herds throughout the country, representing 10% of the Swiss SAC population. METHODS: Prospective, observational study of a convenience sample of SAC. Serum samples were analyzed with 2 serological screening tests. When results diverged, a 3rd ELISA was carried out for confirmation (ID Screen Bluetongue Competition ELISA kit). RESULTS: All sera from the 354 unvaccinated animals were negative in the endemic region. Reliable seroconversion was observed after administration of 2 doses of vaccine. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: This study suggests a low susceptibility of SAC to BTV-8 despite the presence of the virus in the cattle and small ruminant population, indicating that SAC do not play a major role in the epidemiology of BTV-8. Furthermore, these results indicate that commercially available serological tests for BTV-8 can be used in SAC.


Subject(s)
Bluetongue virus/classification , Bluetongue virus/isolation & purification , Bluetongue/virology , Camelids, New World , Disease Reservoirs/veterinary , Animals , Bluetongue/epidemiology , Cattle , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Switzerland/epidemiology
3.
Rev Sci Tech ; 25(3): 1025-38, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17361768

ABSTRACT

Rapid and accurate diagnosis is of the utmost importance in the control of epizootic diseases such as classical swine fever (CSF), and efficacious vaccination can be used as a supporting tool. While most of the recently developed CSF vaccines and diagnostic kits are mostly validated according to World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) standards, not all of the well-established traditional vaccines and diagnostic tests were subject to these validation procedures and requirements. In this report, data were compiled on performance and validation of CSF diagnostic tests and vaccines. In addition, current strategies for differentiating infected from vaccinated animals are reviewed, as is information on the control of CSF in wildlife. Evaluation data on diagnostic tests were kindly provided by National Reference Laboratories for CSF in various European countries.


Subject(s)
Classical Swine Fever Virus/immunology , Classical Swine Fever/diagnosis , Classical Swine Fever/prevention & control , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/veterinary , Sus scrofa , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Animals , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/standards , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Fluorescent Antibody Technique/standards , Fluorescent Antibody Technique/veterinary , Neutralization Tests/standards , Neutralization Tests/veterinary , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine , Vaccines, Marker
4.
Vet Microbiol ; 77(1-2): 71-81, 2000 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11042401

ABSTRACT

Six laboratories participated in a study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of RT-PCR tests for the detection of classical swine fever virus (CSFV). Sets of coded samples were prepared by serial dilution of positive samples and then distributed to each of the laboratories. One set comprised 25 samples of random primed cDNA, synthesised from viral RNA representative of different pestiviruses. The other set comprised samples of blood and serum obtained from virus-free or CSFV-infected pigs. Each laboratory tested the samples using PCR/RT-PCR according to a set of standardised protocols that specified the exact conditions and requirements for inclusion of control samples. Two types of test were evaluated. One amplified a part of the 5'-non coding region of the pestivirus genome by means of a closed, one-tube RT-nested PCR. The other amplified a part of the NS5B gene using non-nested RT-PCR. The results of the laboratories were compared with one another, and with those obtained earlier when similar samples were tested by the same laboratories using non-standardised methods [Paton et al., Classical swine fever virus: a ring test to evaluate RT-PCR detection methods, Vet. Microbiol., in press]. Standardisation of the protocols resulted in a more consistent test sensitivity. Three laboratories avoided significant false positive results. Others that did not, could nevertheless recognise that test specificity was inadequate from the results obtained with the control samples. Minimum requirements for the inclusion of adequate controls and periodic proficiency testing are proposed.


Subject(s)
Classical Swine Fever Virus/isolation & purification , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Classical Swine Fever/diagnosis , Classical Swine Fever Virus/genetics , Diarrhea Viruses, Bovine Viral/genetics , Diarrhea Viruses, Bovine Viral/isolation & purification , False Positive Reactions , RNA, Viral/analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Swine
5.
Vet Microbiol ; 73(2-3): 159-74, 2000 Apr 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10785325

ABSTRACT

Six laboratories participated in an exercise to compare the sensitivity and specificity of RT-PCR tests for the detection of classical swine fever virus (CSFV). Two sets of coded samples were prepared by serial dilution of positive samples and then distributed to each of the laboratories. One set comprised 34 samples of random primed cDNA. These had been synthesised from viral RNA representative of seven different genetic subtypes of CSFV. The other set comprised 40 clinical samples containing tonsil, spleen, whole blood or serum from a pig that had been experimentally infected with CSFV. Each laboratory tested the samples using one or more PCR/RT-PCR tests that they were accustomed to using. The methods and results of the laboratories were compared with one another. The RT-PCR results obtained from testing the clinical samples were also compared with those obtained by virus isolation and antigen ELISA.ELISA. Both RT-PCR and RT-nested PCR appeared to give some false positive results. Several of the PCR tests appear suitable in terms of specificity and sensitivity. Further trials are necessary to compare results when the same test is performed by different laboratories, and to show that improved control procedures can eliminate problems due to false positive reactions.A limited comparison of extraction and reverse transcription procedures showed similar results in each of three participating laboratories, even though the methods were not standardised.


Subject(s)
Classical Swine Fever Virus/isolation & purification , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , DNA, Viral/analysis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Laboratories/standards , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...