Single-session mechanical thrombectomy for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis using a dual mechanism of action device combining basket and rotational thrombectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Interventional treatments for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) remain controversial after publication of the Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (ATTRACT) study. Interventions have been shown to reduce post-thrombotic syndrome severity and improve quality of life in DVT patients, but have been accompanied by risk of major bleeding from thrombolytics. We describe thrombus removal using a novel combined basket-rotational thrombectomy device that minimizes the need for thrombolytics or repeat procedures. METHODS: The aim of this prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter, first-in-human study of 19 patients with acute iliofemoral DVT was to evaluate the safety and performance of the Pounce venous thrombectomy system ≤12 months after treatment. The primary performance end point was defined as procedural success through achievement of Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) grade II lysis in treated vessels with freedom from procedural adverse events. Secondary end points included venous disease severity assessments using the Villalta scale and the Venous Clinical Severity Score, patient quality-of-life measurement using the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-Quality of Life questionnaire, and calf circumference measurements taken at baseline, 24 hours, and 1 month. RESULTS: The primary end point of complete or near-complete thrombus removal (Society of Interventional Radiology grade II or III) was achieved in all patients. All study device-related safety end points were met, with no major bleeding or device-related adverse events. Of the 19 patients treated, 16 (84.2%) did not receive thrombolytics during the procedure. Post-thrombotic syndrome (Villalta scale >4) was identified in 17 of 19 patients (89.5%) at baseline, 4 of 13 patients (30.8%) available for follow-up at 6 months, and 2 of 11 patients (18.2%) at 12 months. The median Venous Clinical Severity Score decreased (P < .001) from 8.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 7-10) at baseline to 4 (IQR, 2-4) at 1 month after the procedure and was similar at 6 months (2; IQR, 2-5) and 12 months (2; IQR, 1.5-3) after the procedure. The median Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-Quality of Life questionnaire score improved (P < .001) by 39 from baseline (57; IQR, 53.5-74) to 1 month (96; IQR, 86-101) after the procedure, and remained high at 6 months (99; IQR, 75-103) and 12 months (98; IQR, 94.5-100). The median calf circumference decreased (P = .089) from 39 cm (IQR, 35-47.8 cm) at baseline to 36 cm (IQR, 32.5-40.5 cm) at 24 hours after the procedure and was 34.5 cm (IQR, 33.2-38.5 cm) at 1 month. CONCLUSIONS: The Pounce device is safe and effective for removal the of thrombus in patients with acute iliofemoral DVT. Initial results demonstrate improvements in venous disease severity and patient quality of life.

A meta-analysis of the medium- to long-term outcomes in patients with chronic deep venous disease treated with dedicated venous stents.

OBJECTIVE: This review summarizes the safety profile, stent patency, and clinical effectiveness of dedicated venous stents for the treatment of chronic deep venous disease. The approaches to stenting and post-procedural management of different vascular units are also explored. METHODS: The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for pertinent literature published from January 2010 to January 2023. Outcomes related to post-stenting symptoms and health-related quality of life were described narratively. A meta analysis was conducted to evaluate stent patency, ulcer healing, bleeding, and 30-day stent thrombosis, and these outcomes were presented as proportion event rates. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were identified comprising of 2218 patients. 62.7% of individuals had post-thrombotic stenosis or occlusion. The majority of patients (78.6%) were noted to have complete occlusions of their deep veins before stenting. Eleven different dedicated venous stents were deployed. At 12 months, the primary patency rate was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 76%-90%), the primary-assisted patency rate was 90% (95% CI: 85%-96%), and the secondary patency rate was 95% (95% CI: 92%-98%). A significant improvement in health-related quality of life was demonstrated after intervention. In total, 68.8% (95% CI: 52.0%-83.7%) of ulcers healed at the last follow-up. The remaining symptomatic changes were described narratively; improvements in pain, venous claudication, and edema after stenting were observed. Seventeen deaths occurred, but none were linked to the stenting procedures. A total of 159 cases (7.2% of patients) of in-stent stenosis were observed, whereas 110 stents (5.0% of patients) were occluded. The incidence of major and minor bleeding was 1.7% (95% CI: 1.0%-2.5%) and 3.2% (95% CI: 1.3%-5.6%), respectively, more commonly seen in patients undergoing hybrid intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Deep venous stenting using dedicated venous stents is a safe technique to treat chronic deep venous stenosis and/or occlusion. Within the limitations of this study, deep venous stenting is associated with good patency rates and symptomatic improvement.

Interventional therapies in acute pulmonary embolus-current trends and future directions.

Venous thromboembolic disease presenting with acute pulmonary embolus (PE) can be treated in a variety of ways from anticoagulation as an outpatient to surgical embolectomy with many new interventional therapies being developed. Mortality in these patients can be as high as 50% and many of these treatments are also considered to be high risk. Early involvement of a multidisciplinary team and patient risk stratification can aid management decisions in these complex patients who can suddenly deteriorate.In this review, we summarise the evidence behind new and developing interventional therapies in the treatment of high and intermediate-high risk PE including catheter-directed thrombolysis, pharmacomechanical thrombolysis, thromboaspiration and the growing role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the stabilisation and management of this cohort of patients.

Optimal activated clotting time during peripheral artery endovascular procedures: cutting the gordian knot.

All endovascular procedures need an effective anticoagulation regimen that avoids thrombo-embolic complications due to the insertion and manipulation of various intravascular devices. Systemic heparinization reduces the risk of thrombosis but there is no conclusive evidence regarding the correct use of anticoagulant medications and accordant monitoring, especially in endovascular peripheral arterial procedures. Anticoagulation must be maintained during the whole vascular procedure, especially during partial or complete blood flow interruption. Reaching and maintaining the correct coagulative status is mandatory to avoid or reduce thromboembolic complications that could limit the procedure's effectiveness or be harmful to the patient. Patients' baseline variables and procedure-related elements can influence the way anticoagulation should be administered and how coagulative status has to be monitored. This review aimed to clarify the critical points of anticoagulation and monitoring management for non-cardiac arterial procedures in order to understand the best way to manage vascular procedures anticoagulation.

Leg Ulcer Pathway Acceleration (LUPA) study.

BACKGROUND: Leg ulcers are common, costly, and significantly impair quality of life, but their management is variable and associated with considerable delays in healing. The aim of this study was to design an accelerated leg ulcer care pathway in a community and hospital setting to improve patient outcomes. METHODS: A new referral pathway was developed using a series of healthcare professional and patient interviews, focus groups, and stakeholder workshops. The referral pathway, investigation and treatment protocols were further informed by clinical guidelines to develop the Leg Ulcer Pathway Acceleration care pathway. The outcomes of a consecutive series of patients enrolled in the Leg Ulcer Pathway Acceleration care pathway were compared with the outcomes of patients from a historical leg ulcer cohort from the same community and hospital setting. RESULTS: A total of 110 eligible patients were enrolled and followed prospectively through the Leg Ulcer Pathway Acceleration care pathway. Their outcomes were compared with those of 183 patients with venous leg ulcers identified from existing hospital and community ulcer centres, and acting as the historical control group. The 110 patients in the Leg Ulcer Pathway Acceleration group consisted of 73 (66 per cent) men, had a mean(s.d.) age of 55.7(17.2) years, and had a median initial ulcer duration of 14.5 (i.q.r. 6-30) months. The 183 patients in the historical control group consisted of 119 (65 per cent) men, had a mean(s.d.) age of 56.4(17.2) years, and had a median initial ulcer duration of 13.5 (i.q.r. 6-47) months. Venous disease was treated in 67/110 (61 per cent) and deep venous disease was treated in 33/110 (30 per cent) of patients in the Leg Ulcer Pathway Acceleration cohort. In contrast, only 16/183 (8 per cent) of patients in the control group were treated for superficial venous insufficiency and 4/183 (2 per cent) of patients in the control group were treated for deep venous disease. Ulcer healing rates at 12 months were 80 and 20 per cent in the Leg Ulcer Pathway Acceleration group and the control group respectively (P < 0.001). Adjusted for baseline characteristics, the OR for a healed ulcer at 12 months was 21.21 (95 per cent c.i.. 11.32 to 42.46) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The introduction of an accelerated leg ulcer care pathway significantly improves ulcer healing when compared with historical controls.

Target Balloon-Assisted Antegrade and Retrograde Use of Re-Entry Catheters in Complex Chronic Total Occlusions.

Purpose, Retrograde recanalizations have gained increasing recognition in complex arterial occlusive disease. Re-entry devices are a well described adjunct for antegrade recanalizations. We present our experience with target balloon-assisted antegrade and retrograde recanalizations using re-entry devices in challenging chronic total occlusions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report data from a retrospective multicenter registry. Eligibility criteria included either antegrade or retrograde use of the OutbackTM or GoBackTM re-entry catheter in combination with a balloon as a target to accomplish wire passage, when conventional antegrade and retrograde recanalization attempts had been unsuccessful. Procedural outcomes included technical success (defined as wire passage though the occlusion and delivery of adjunctive therapy with <30% residual stenosis at final angiogram), safety (periprocedural complications, e.g., bleeding, vessel injury, or occlusion of the artery at the re-entry site, and distal embolizations), and clinical outcome (amputation-free survival and freedom from target lesion revascularization after 12-months follow-up). RESULTS: Thirty-six consecutive patients underwent target balloon-assisted recanalization attempts. Fourteen (39 %) patients had a history of open vascular surgery in the index limb. Fifteen patients were claudications (Rutherford Class 2 or 3, 21 presented with chronic limb threatening limb ischemia (Rutherford Class 4 to 6). The locations of the occlusive lesions were as follows: iliac arteries in 3 cases, femoropopliteal artery in 39 cases, and in below-the-knee arteries in 12 cases. In 15 cases, recanalization was attempted in multilevel occlusions. Retrograde access was attempted in 1 case in the common femoral artery, in the femoropopliteal segment in 10 cases, in below-the-knee arteries in 23 cases, and finally in 2 patients via the brachial artery. In 10 cases, the re-entry devices were inserted via the retrograde access site. Technical success was achieved in 34 (94 %) patients. There were 3 periprocedural complications, none directly related to the target balloon-assisted re-entry maneuver. Amputation-free survival was 87.8 % and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization was 86.6 % after 12-months follow-up. CONCLUSION: Target balloon-assisted use of re-entry devices in chronic total occlusions provides an effective and safe endovascular adjunct, when conventional antegrade and retrograde recanalization attempts have failed.

Endovascular salvage of thrombosed haemodialysis vascular access.

Background: Haemodialysis access thrombosis is associated with significant morbidity and access abandonment rates, for which endovascular salvage is a well described treatment option. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of endovascular salvage procedures of thrombosed vascular access circuits and identify factors influencing outcomes. Patients and methods: Retrospective review of 328 consecutive procedures performed over 10 years at our institution between January 2010 and December 2019. Patient demographics, access circuit characteristics, procedure details and outcome data were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate patency rates and Cox multivariate regression analysis to identify factors affecting outcomes. Results: Technical and clinical success rates were 87.8% and 75.9% respectively. The primary, primary assisted and secondary patency rates at 6 months were 42.2%, 46.7% and 59.1%; and at 12 months were 23.4%, 28.3% and 41.8% respectively. Median access circuit survival was 9.2 months. Major complication rate was 5.2% including 3 procedure-related deaths. Native AVF, lower time from thrombosis to intervention and pharmacomechanical thrombectomy using AngioJetTM predicted positive outcomes. Previous thrombectomy within 3 months and residual thrombus at completion were associated with poorer outcomes. Age and hypertension predicted higher complication rates. Conclusions: This is one of the largest single center series of endovascular salvage of thrombosed haemodialysis access and demonstrates that endovascular treatment is effective and provides durable access circuit survival. Careful patient screening is essential to optimize outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of the Mynx Control vascular closure device in peripheral arterial procedures: A prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: This article aims to present a prospective study investigating the safety and efficacy of the Mynx Control extravascular closure device (Cordis Corporation, FL, USA), for femoral arterial closure in patients undergoing peripheral arterial procedures. METHODS: Between January 2020 and February 2021, 100 Mynx Control devices were deployed in 91 consecutive patients (mean age: 67.5 ± 16.9 years) who underwent peripheral arterial procedures. We used ultrasound and/or fluoroscopy during Mynx Control deployment and ultrasound post-procedure to detect complications. Femoral artery punctures included 62 (62%) antegrade and 38 (38%) retrograde punctures. The mean activated clotting time at time of device deployment was 221s. The primary endpoints were technical success, device failure, and complication rates up to 30 days. RESULTS: A 5F vascular sheath was used in 43 cases (43%) (36 (36%) 6F and 21 (21%) 7F). The majority of our cases had antegrade access (62%). Overall technical success rate was 97% in both antegrade and retrograde cases. In total, there were 4 minor complications: 3 (3%) cases of pseudoaneurysm and 1 (1%) case of haematoma. No major complications were recorded post-procedure or 30 days post index procedure. CONCLUSION: The Mynx Control vascular closure device is safe and effective in achieving haemostasis in patients undergoing antegrade and retrograde peripheral angioplasty procedures.

Risk factors and classification of reintervention following deep venous stenting for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is associated with the development of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Thrombolysis and deep venous stenting can restore vessel outflow and can reduce the incidence of PTS. However, for a proportion of patients, subsequent stenosis or reocclusion will necessitate further intervention. In the present study, we aimed to identify the risk factors, examine the outcomes (reintervention success and PTS), and develop a classification system for reintervention. METHODS: A retrospective single-center cohort study of patients who had undergone successful lysis for iliofemoral DVT from 2013 to 2017. The patients' records and imaging studies were examined for demographics, risk factors, extent of thrombus and vessel clearance, stenting, flow, reintervention, anticoagulation compliance, Villalta score, and secondary patency. From our findings, a system of classification for patients for whom procedures have failed was developed, constituting technical, hematologic, flow related, or multiple factors. RESULTS: Of 143 limbs (133 patients), 48 (33.6%) had required reintervention, of which 25 had presented with reocclusion (17.4%). The median time to reintervention was 45 days. The need for reintervention was associated with inferior vena cava thrombus (risk ratio [RR], 2.16; P < .01), stenting across the inguinal ligament (RR, 2.08; P < .01), and anticoagulation noncompliance (RR, 7.09; P < .01). Successful reintervention was achieved in 31 limbs (64.6%): 23 of 23 (100%) treated before occlusion vs 8 of 25 (36.4%) treated after occlusion (RR, 32.31; P < .01). A greater incidence of any PTS was observed for patients requiring reintervention (median Villalta score, 3 [interquartile range, 1-5]; vs 1 [interquartile range, 1-4]; RR, 2.28; P = .029). Cases without complete vessel occlusion (reintervention and control) had a lower rate of any PTS (14.0% vs 42.9%; RR, 3.06; P < .01) and moderate to severe PTS (3.0% vs 14.3%; RR, 4.76; P = .046) Technical issues were observed in 54.2% of reintervention cases and 6.3% of cases not requiring reintervention (P < .01). Hematologic issues were identified in 33.3% of reintervention cases and 1.1% of cases not requiring reintervention (P < .01). Flow-related issues were observed in 43.8% of the reintervention cases and no cases not requiring reintervention (P < .01). Of the reintervention cases, 27.1% were multifactorial and were associated with a lower rate of vessel salvage; however, this did not translate into a significant difference in secondary patency on survival analysis (RR, 1.70; P = .429). CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of patients required reintervention because of potentially preventable factors. Anticoagulation compliance, thrombus burden, and poor flow are important risk factors to consider in patient selection. Reintervention increased the risk of PTS and was more often successful when achieved before vessel occlusion.

Performance of Open and Closed Cell Laser Cut Nitinol Stents for the Treatment of Chronic Iliofemoral Venous Outflow Obstruction in Patients Treated at a Single Centre.

OBJECTIVE: A number of dedicated self expanding nitinol stents have been developed for use in the venous system, with both open cell (OC) and closed cell (CC) designs available. Data comparing these different designs are lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients treated with open and closed cells for unilateral chronic iliac vein obstruction. METHODS: A single centre retrospective cohort study was conducted, including all patients treated with a dedicated nitinol venous stent between 2014 and 2019. Stent patency and details of re-interventions (including lysis, venoplasty, reinforcement, extension, arteriovenous fistula formation) were examined in the first post-operative year. Subgroup analysis described outcomes for patients treated with OC and CC stents ending above the inguinal ligament and those who required extension into the common femoral vein. Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with loss of primary patency. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients were included (OC 100 patients, CC 107 patients). There was no significant difference between the groups for age (OC 42 years, CC 44 years); gender (OC and CC 67% female); presence of post-thrombotic lesions (OC 71%, CC 73%); stenting across the inguinal ligament (OC 58%, CC 56%), or presence of inflow disease (OC 49%, CC 47%). Primary and cumulative patency at 12 months were similar between groups (primary: OC 63%, CC 65%; cumulative: OC 93%, CC 90%). Patients with a CC stent across the inguinal ligament had a greater risk of needing multiple re-interventions at one year compared with those with an OC stent (odds ratio 2.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16 - 6.9) but overall, the only factor significantly associated with loss of primary patency was inflow vessel disease (hazard ratio 3.39, 95% CI 1.73 - 6.62, p < .001). CONCLUSION: OC and CC dedicated nitinol venous stents were observed to perform similarly in terms of patency and symptom improvement at one year. Disease of the inflow vessels was the most important factor associated with a loss of stent patency irrespective of stent design.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Workload, Case Mix and hospital Resources at a Tertiary Vascular Unit.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated impact on the provision of vascular services, and the pattern of presentation and practice in a tertiary referral vascular unit. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study from a prospectively maintained data-base comparing two time frames, Period 1(15th March-30th May 2019-P1) and Period 2(15th March-30th May 2020-P2)All the patients who presented for a vascular review in the 2 timeframes were included. Metrics of service and patient care episodes were collected and compared including, the number of emergency referrals, patient encounters, consultations, emergency admissions and interventions. Impact on key hospital resources such as critical care and imaging facilities during the two time periods were also examined. RESULTS: There was an absolute reduction of 44% in the number of patients who required urgent or emergency treatment from P1 to P2 (141 vs 79). We noted a non-significant trend towards an increase in the proportion of patients presenting with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia (CLTI) Rutherford 5&6 (P=0.09) as well as a reduction in the proportion of admissions related to Aortic Aneurysm (P=0.21). There was a significant absolute reduction of 77% in all vascular interventions from P1 to P2 with the greatest reductions noted in Carotid (P=0.02), Deep Venous (P=0.003) and Aortic interventions (P=0.016). The number of lower limb interventions also decreased though there was a significant increase as a relative proportion of all vascular interventions in P2 (P=0.001). There was an absolute reduction in the number of scans performed for vascular pathology; Duplex scans reduced by 86%(P<0.002), CT scans by 68%(P<0.003) and MRIs by 74%(P<0.009). CONCLUSION: We report a decrease in urgent and emergency vascular presentations, admissions and interventions. The reduction in patients presenting with lower limb pathology was not as significant as other vascular conditions, resulting in a significant rise in interventions for CLTI and DFI as a proportion of all vascular interventions. These observations will help guide the provision of vascular services during future pandemics.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Outcomes in Patients With Critical Limb Threatening Ischaemia and Diabetic Foot Infection.

OBJECTIVE: Examine the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the outcomes in patients with CLTI or DFI. BACKGROUND: Patients with CLTI and/or DFI are at risk of amputations if not treated in a timely manner. METHODS: We compared the outcomes in patients with CLTI or DFI during 2 periods; Period 1[P1] (15/03/2019-31/05/2019) and period 2[P2] (15/03/ 2020-31/05/2020- corresponding to COVID-19 pandemic). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine patients were treated in P1 [mean age 70 years (±11), Male:Female = 102:37] whereas 95 patients were treated in P2 [mean age 67 (±12), Male:Female = 64:31]. The 2 cohorts were matched regarding Rutherford category (P = 0.25) and GLASS classification (P = 0.38). Notably, the time from onset of symptom to clinical presentation was significantly longer [31 (1-105) days vs 27 (0-78) days, (P = 0.017)], whereas the time from presentation to first intervention was significantly shorter [3 (0-61) days vs 5 (0-65) days, (P = 0.013)] in P2 compared to P1. There was a significantly higher white cell count (P = 0.014) and CRP (P = 0.004) on admission in P2. Having treatment for CLTI or DFI in P2 was an independent predictor of worse primary patency rate and freedom from major adverse limb events. At 90 days, amputation-free survival and limb salvage were noticeably worse in P2 compared to P1 (amputation-free survival was 80% and 87% whereas limb salvage was 64% and 72% in P2 and P1, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CLTI and DFI experienced a significantly delayed presentation with features of sepsis on admission in P2. Treatment in P2 was a predictor of worse primary patency and freedom from major adverse limb events and therefore close and long follow-up is advisable.

Medium-term outcomes after inferior vena cava reconstruction for acute and chronic deep vein thrombosis and retroperitoneal fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we evaluated the technical and clinical outcomes after endovascular inferior vena cava (IVC) reconstruction in patients with nonmalignant obstruction. METHODS: The preoperative, procedural, and follow-up medical records and imaging studies were retrospectively reviewed for 59 consecutive patients who had undergone endovascular IVC reconstruction for nonmalignant obstruction from February 2014 to January 2019. The patients were classified into three groups according to the quality of their infrainguinal inflow vessels. The outcomes measured were the primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates, reintervention rates, and symptomatic resolution. RESULTS: The indications for treatment were post-thrombotic syndrome (n = 41), acute deep vein thrombosis (n = 12), and retroperitoneal fibrosis (n = 6). The median patient age was 37 years, 11 months, 71.2% were men, and 32.2% had a diagnosis of thrombophilia, with no significant difference in these demographics between the three inflow groups. The median follow-up duration was 2 years, 3 months (range, 6 months to 6 years, 5 months). The whole-cohort primary patency was 91.2%, 71.0%, and 24.1% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Secondary patency was 76.7% at 1 year and 66.4% at both 3 and 5 years. Inflow group A (no post-thrombotic disease in the femoral or deep femoral veins) demonstrated significantly higher primary patency compared with group B (stenotic disease in one or two infrainguinal inflow veins; P = .009) and significantly higher secondary patency than for both groups B (P = .008) and C (all three infrainguinal inflow veins had stenosed or femoral and/or deep femoral vein occlusion was present; P = .04). In post-thrombotic syndrome patients, the Villalta scores had decreased from a mean of 14.2 to 8.1 at 1 year and 6.8 at 2 years, and the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life score had improved from a mean of 19.8 to 54.1 and 57.3 at 1 and 2 years, respectively. In the patients with acute deep vein thrombosis, the Villalta score was 2.8 at 1 year and 0 at 2 years. In the patients with retroperitoneal fibrosis, the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life score had improved from a mean of 25.3 at baseline to 44 at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular IVC reconstruction for nonmalignant obstruction can achieve good patency and clinical improvement, although the outcomes were poorer for patients with post-thrombotic disease of the femoral and deep femoral veins.

Optimising access and provision of interventional radiology service to patients by utilising a new referral system.

OBJECTIVE: Implementing a streamlined interventional radiology (IR) service in the UK has been a challenge. This study aims to review a set of changes introduced in IR at a tertiary centre, including a new referral process and the designation of IR clinical nurse specialists. METHODS: A new process of referring patients to IR using a single generic referral pathway was implemented, replacing an order dropdown-based system. A qualitative survey was designed and distributed as a single-use web link in order to assess the satisfaction and impact of this new process. Responses were based on Likert scale and pertained to perceived qualities of the new referral process. Data analysis was performed to identify specialty and grade-specific trends and possible differences amongst groups. RESULTS: Findings from 98 respondents revealed a strong overall satisfaction with the new referral method and support for its continuation. Subgroup analysis by specialty, concluded medical specialties rated the new referral system more favourably than surgical specialties across all aspects: time efficiency, ease of use, periprocedural support and overall user experience. The new system also increased departmental productivity with an increase in the number of patients treated by 11.2%. CONCLUSION: Micropolicy changes within individual IR departments such as the replacement of a request-based referral system to one which puts IR in control of vetting and patient flow is one of many changes that reinforce the transformational phase of this specialty. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Micropolicy changes within IR departments are key in the progression and widespread recognition of the specialty.

Utilisation of Image Guidance to Enhance Safety of Deployment of the Mynx Control Vascular Closure Device.

The Mynx Control device (Cardinal Healthcare, Dublin, Ohio, USA) was recently licensed and allows for entirely extravascular arteriotomy closure. It uses a polyethylene glycol sealant plug which is absorbed fully within 30 days, alleviating concerns around difficulties with regaining access in future. The Mynx device uses a balloon, inflated within the artery and retracted against the arteriotomy to achieve haemostasis, with the extravascular sealant plug then deployed outside the vessel wall. While the manufacturer's instructions for use do not include utilisation of imaging guidance, we routinely employ fluoroscopic and/or ultrasound to ensure safe use of the device. These techniques allow confirmation of balloon position against the arteriotomy, hence avoiding inadvertent deployment of the plug partially or fully intraluminally. Visualisation of the balloon within the lumen also eliminates risk of plaque disruption in diseased vessels on retraction of the device. Image guidance adds little time to device deployment, and the safety benefits are such that we recommend that practitioners elsewhere consider adopting our techniques. Here, we describe the process involved in both techniques.

The Outback Re-Entry Device. A Pictorial Review.

The Outback™ Elite re-entry catheter (CORDIS, Cardinal Health, USA) is designed to facilitate placement and positioning of guidewires within the peripheral vasculature and allows for re-entry of a guidewire back into the true lumen of a vessel following a subintimal crossing of an arterial occlusion. The device was first introduced in 2005 and has become widely utilized in a variety of situations involving both arterial and venous interventions. This article aims to share our experiences with the Outback™ device and inform interventionalists of its utility and versatility.

Intraluminal catheter plasty. An alternative technique to remove tethered abdominal surgical drains.

OBJECTIVE: Retained surgical drains can lead to significant complications including gastrointestinal fistulae, abscess formation and intestinal obstruction. Today, there is little in the literature describing the role of Interventional Radiology (IR) in assisting the removal of surgical drains. We describe the use of the well-established intraluminal catheter plasty technique, previously used for the removal of adhered central venous catheters, in order to remove a tethered abdominal drain. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 67-year-old female was referred to the IR department for the removal of a 24 Fr Robinson's intra-abdominal surgical drain that could not be removed by conventional methods, as there was a concern that it was kinked internally. Both fluoroscopy and cone beam CT were performed, which identified the drain to be sited within the pelvis with no kinks.A first attempt to remove the drain over a 0.035 stiff wire was unsuccessful due to resistance and patient discomfort. We suspected that this was due to adhesions surrounding the drain. Consequently, a 9 × 40 mm angioplasty balloon was used over the wire with serial dilatations along the drain to disrupt the adhesions. Several areas of waisting were identified. The drain was gently withdrawn over the wire with minimal resistance. Ex-vivo inspection of the drain showed no evidence of structural damage and fluoroscopic imaging confirmed no retained fragments. CONCLUSION: We describe a safe and effective novel technique of intraluminal catheter plasty used to remove a tethered surgical drain following failed conventional methods.

Initial Canadian Experience of Prostate Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Midterm Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the midterm outcomes and safety of prostate artery embolization (PAE) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review of PAE performed for BPH was performed. Validated International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) index, and International Index for Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaires were completed at baseline and at least 12 months post-procedure. Prostate imaging was performed preprocedure as well as 3 months and 12 months post-procedure to assess prostate volume (PV). Uroflowmetry was also performed at baseline and 12 months post-procedure to assess urine flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual (PVR) volume. Adverse events were graded according to Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) guidelines. RESULTS: Eighty male patients underwent the PAE procedure (mean age 69 years). Prostate volume decreased significantly from a mean volume 156 to 107 mL after 12 months post-procedure, commensurate with a mean reduction of 27.5% (P < .05). Significant improvements were seen in IPSS (21.8 vs 10.5) and QoL (4.5 vs 2.0) from baseline to 12 months post-procedure (P < .05). There was no significant change in IIEF-5 score. There was a significant reduction in PVR (202 vs 105 mL) and improvement in Qmax (5.9 vs 10.0 mL/s) between baseline and 12 months post-procedure (P < .05). No major complications occurred; 4 minor complications occurred (SIR grade A or B). CONCLUSION: Prostate artery embolization achieved a clinically and statistically significant prostate volume reduction, symptom and QoL improvement, and enhanced uroflowmetry parameters in patients with BPH.

Patient radiation exposure for endovascular deep venous interventions.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess the cumulative radiation exposure from preoperative, periprocedural, and follow-up imaging to patients who underwent common endovascular deep venous interventions for acute and chronic central venous outflow obstructive diseases; namely, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) thrombolysis, unilateral chronic iliofemoral venous stenting, and inferior vena cava (IVC) reconstruction in a single center. METHODS: Patients who had DVT thrombolysis of upper extremity (UE) DVT and lower extremity (LE) DVT, unilateral chronic iliofemoral venous stenting, and endovascular IVC reconstruction between May 1, 2012, and July 31, 2017, in a single unit were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, anatomic DVT, imaging, technical details of the index procedure, follow-up, and radiation exposure measured in dose-length product, dose-area product (DAP), and fluoroscopy time (FT) from related computed tomography scans and interventions were analyzed. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to assess for significance of differences between subgroups. A P value of less than .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In total, 20 UE DVT thrombolysis, 91 LE DVT thrombolysis, 56 unilateral chronic iliofemoral venous stenting, and 39 endovascular IVC reconstruction patients were included in the study, with the following median ages: 39 years (range, 20-67 years), 44 years (range, 15-78 years), 45 years (range, 20-80 years), and 35 years (range, 18 -73 years), respectively. The median cumulative DAP for the index DVT thrombolysis was 9.2 Gycm2 (range, 0.2-176.0 Gycm2) for LE DVT and 2.0 Gycm2 (range, 0.1-11.7 Gycm2) for UE DVT (P < .0001). The median cumulative FT for the index thrombolysis was 981 seconds (range, 20-4890 seconds) and 837 seconds (range, 19-2895 seconds) for LE DVT and UE DVT, respectively (P = .18). For unilateral chronic iliofemoral venous stenting, the median cumulative DAP and FT were 32.4 Gycm2 (range, 0.1-289.6 Gycm2) and 660 seconds (range, 246-4200 seconds), respectively. Meanwhile, the median cumulative DAP and FT for the endovascular IVC reconstruction were 60.8 Gycm2 (range, 2.5-269.1 Gycm2) and 2846 seconds (range, 836-11682 seconds), respectively. The median DAP for secondary procedures during follow-up was 6.6 Gycm2 (range, 0.8 186.5 Gycm2), 1.9 Gycm2 (range, 0.2-111.7 Gycm2), and 24.3 Gycm2 (range, 0.2-157.5 Gycm2) for LE DVT thrombolysis, unilateral chronic iliofemoral venous stenting, and endovascular IVC reconstruction, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patient radiation exposure for endovascular deep venous interventions for central venous outflow obstruction measured in DAP and FT seemed to be less than and at most similar to anatomically comparable arterial interventions in the literature. However, these patients were usually much younger than those with arterial diseases and may need secondary interventions involving further radiation exposure in their lifetime.