ProPACC: Protocol for a Trial of Integrated Specialty Palliative Care for Critically Ill Older Adults.

BACKGROUND: Each year, approximately one million older adults die in American intensive care units (ICUs) or survive with significant functional impairment. Inadequate symptom management, surrogates' psychological distress and inappropriate healthcare use are major concerns. Pioneering work by Dr. J. Randall Curtis paved the way for integrating palliative care (PC) specialists to address these needs, but convincing proof of efficacy has not yet been demonstrated. DESIGN: We will conduct a multicenter patient-randomized efficacy trial of integrated specialty PC (SPC) vs. usual care for 500 high-risk ICU patients over age 60 and their surrogate decision-makers from five hospitals in Pennsylvania. INTERVENTION: The intervention will follow recommended best practices for inpatient PC consultation. Patients will receive care from a multidisciplinary SPC team within 24 hours of enrollment that continues until hospital discharge or death. SPC clinicians will meet with patients, families, and the ICU team every weekday. SPC and ICU clinicians will jointly participate in proactive family meetings according to a predefined schedule. Patients in the control arm will receive routine ICU care. OUTCOMES: Our primary outcome is patient-centeredness of care, measured using the modified Patient Perceived Patient-Centeredness of Care scale. Secondary outcomes include surrogates' psychological symptom burden and health resource utilization. Other outcomes include patient survival, as well as interprofessional collaboration. We will also conduct prespecified subgroup analyses using variables such as PC needs, measured by the Needs of Social Nature, Existential Concerns, Symptoms, and Therapeutic Interaction scale. CONCLUSIONS: This trial will provide robust evidence about the impact of integrating SPC with critical care on patient, family, and health system outcomes.

How Should Clinicians Respond to Medical Requests from Clinician Family Members of Patients?

In the medical profession, receiving a request for medical management from a colleague is a routine experience. However, when the colleague is a family member of a patient and the desired or requested medical intervention is not medically indicated in the attending physician's view, the situation becomes more complicated. Ethical issues include respect for patient autonomy and social justice as well as nonmaleficence. Furthermore, interpersonal and professional relationships may be tested in this situation. Addressing the colleague's concerns with empathy and respect, without compromising one's own medical judgment, is critical in resolving these kinds of conflicts.

Clinical features of the urge-to-cough in patients with chronic cough.

BACKGROUND: The urge-to-cough is a consciously perceived compulsion, previously investigated in healthy volunteers inhaling irritants. We aimed to characterise the urge-to-cough and associated sensations in a group of chronic cough patients attending a specialist clinic. METHODS: 100 patients with chronic cough [mean age 60 yrs (±11.89), 71 female, median cough duration 7 yrs (IQR 11.13) completed an investigator-led survey describing aggravating and relieving factors for urge-to-cough, associated somatic sensations (quality, location, intensity) and emotions. Subjects rated each using a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree) or visual analogue scale (VAS). Cluster analysis identified groups of patients with similar patterns of responses. RESULTS: Subjects rated the severity of urge-to-cough highly (84.5 mm on VAS). The majority always cough in response to the urge-to-cough (91%), but fewer (69%) always experienced an urge-to-cough before coughing. The somatic sensations associated with the urge-to-cough were described as an irritation (86%) or tickle (73%), localised in the neck (75%). The urge-to-cough was triggered by various stimuli including smoky atmospheres (79%), talking (72%), cold temperatures (67%) and dry atmospheres (66%) and relieved by coughing (63%), and drinking (61%); in 42% nothing provided relief. Cluster analysis suggested two distinct patient groups, differing in the factors precipitating the urge-to-cough rather than quality or location of associated sensations. CONCLUSION: The unifying characteristics of patients with chronic cough are a severe urge-to-cough associated with throat irritation, consistent with sensory neuronal dysfunction of vagal afferents. Precipitants of the urge-to-cough vary though, and can be used to classify sub-groups of patients who may share similar underlying pathophysiology.

Commentary on Masel et al. Predicting discharge of palliative care inpatients by measuring their heart rate variability.

The accurate determination of prognosis is a challenging and important aspect of end of life care. A more accurate prognosis provides patients and their families' time to plan and prepare for the end of life, and prioritize care based on individual goals and values. While a number of prognostic tools and indices provide insight into a patient's general prognosis, the use of heart rate variability (HRV) as a predictor of live discharge from a palliative care unit (PCU) is a unique approach to exploring non-invasive ways for more accurate prognostication.

Documentation quality of inpatient code status discussions.

CONTEXT: Accurate documentation of inpatient code status discussions (CSDs) is important because of frequent patient care handoffs. OBJECTIVES: To examine the quality of inpatient CSD documentation and compare documentation quality across physician services. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients hospitalized between January 1 and June 30, 2011 with a new or canceled do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order at least 24 hours after hospital admission. We developed a chart abstraction tool to assess the documentation of five quality elements: 1) who the DNR discussion was held with, 2) patient goals/values, 3) prognosis, 4) treatment options and resuscitation outcomes, and 5) health care power of attorney (HCPOA). RESULTS: We identified 379 patients, of whom 235 (62%) had a note documenting a CSD. After excluding patients lacking a note from their primary service, 227 remained for analysis. Sixty-three percent of notes contained documentation of who the discussion was held with. Patient goals/values were documented in 43%, discussion of prognosis in 14%, treatment options and resuscitation outcomes in 40%, and HCPOA in 29%. Hospitalists were more likely than residents to document who the discussion was held with (P < 0.001) and patient goals/values (P < 0.001), whereas internal medicine residents were more likely to document HCPOA (P = 0.04). The mean number of elements documented for hospitalists was 2.40, followed by internal medicine residents at 2.07, and non-internal medicine trainees at 1.30 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Documentation quality of inpatient CSDs was poor. Our findings highlight the need to improve the quality of resident and attending CSD documentation.

Effects of cancer comorbidity on disease management: making the case for diabetes education (a report from the SOAR program).

Individuals with type II diabetes have an increased risk of cancer diagnosis (relative risk [RR]=1.12-2.50) and mortality (RR=1.4) compared to normoglycemic individuals. Biologic mechanisms, including mitogenic effects of insulin, hyperglycemia, and increased oxidative stress, as well as behavioral factors (eg, difficulty managing the comorbidity) may explain the elevated risk. To investigate the effects of the comorbidity on disease management, the authors compared diabetes education utilization in individuals with diabetes-cancer co-morbidity to utilization by individuals with diabetes in the absence of cancer. The effect of diabetes education on outcomes was further assessed in the subset of individuals with diabetes-cancer comorbidity. Administrative claims data were used for this analysis. The study population included individuals >60 years of age and members of both commercial and Medicare Advantage health plans from a private national database of payer data, but excluded Medicare fee for service and Medicaid patients. Most of these individuals were eligible to receive reimbursement for diabetes education. Diabetes education utilization was identified using procedure codes. Outcomes were assessed for a 3-year time period. There was little difference in diabetes education utilization between individuals with diabetes in the absence of cancer (3.8% utilization) and those with diabetes-cancer comorbidity (3.5% utilization). Individuals who receive diabetes education are more likely to have multiple HbA1c tests per year, fewer emergency department visits, fewer hospital admissions, and lower care-associated costs (except for outpatient and pharmacy averages). When diabetes coexists with cancer, management of diabetes often lags, making diabetes education an imperative.