Associations of dexamethasone's effect on morphine consumption after total knee arthroplasty-Subgroup analyses.

The DEXamethasone twice for pain treatment after Total Knee Arthroplasty (DEX-2-TKA) trial showed that adding one and two doses of 24 mg intravenous dexamethasone to paracetamol, ibuprofen and local infiltration analgesia, reduced morphine consumption (primary outcome) within 48 h after TKA. We aimed to explore the differences in the effect of dexamethasone on morphine consumption in different subgroups. Quantile regression adjusted for site was used to test for significant interaction between the predefined dichotomised subgroups and treatment group. The subgroups were defined based on baseline data: sex (male/female), age (≤65 years/>65 years), American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA)-score (ASA I + II/III), visual analogue score of preoperative pain at rest (≤30 mm/>30 mm), pain during mobilisation (≤30 mm/>30 mm), type of anaesthesia (spinal anaesthesia/general anaesthesia and spinal converted to general anaesthesia), and prior daily use of analgesics (either paracetamol and/or NSAID/neither). These analyses were supplemented with post hoc multivariate linear regression analyses. Test of interaction comparing sex in the pairwise comparison between DX2 (dexamethasone [24 mg] + dexamethasone [24 mg]) versus placebo (p = .02), showed a larger effect of dexamethasone on morphine consumption in male patients compared to females. Test of interaction comparing age in the pairwise comparison between DX1 (dexamethasone [24 mg] + placebo) versus placebo (p = .04), showed a larger effect of dexamethasone on morphine consumption in younger patients (≤65 years) compared to older. All remaining subgroup analyses showed no evidence of a difference. The supplemental multivariate analyses did not support any significant interaction for sex (p = .256) or age (p = .730) but supported a significant interaction with the type of anaesthesia (p < .001). Our results from the quantile regression analyses indicate that the male sex and younger age (≤65 years) may be associated with a larger analgesic effect of dexamethasone than the effects in other types of patients. However, this is not supported by post-hoc multivariate linear regression analyses. The two types of analyses both supported a possible interaction with the type of anaesthesia.

Pain treatment after total hip arthroplasty: Detailed statistical analysis plan for the RECIPE randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The RECIPE trial systematically investigates the effects of different combinations of paracetamol, ibuprofen and dexamethasone for pain treatment after total hip arthroplasty. To preserve transparency, minimise risk of bias and to prevent data-driven analysis, we present this detailed statistical analysis plan. METHODS: The RECIPE trial is a randomised, blinded, parallel four-group multicenter clinical trial for patients undergoing planned primary total hip arthroplasty. Interventions are initiated preoperatively and continued for 24 h postoperatively. Primary outcome is total opioid consumption 0-24 h after end of surgery. Primary analysis will be performed in the modified intention to treat population of all patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, and all analyses will be stratified for site. We will perform pairwise comparisons between each of the four groups. The primary outcome will be analysed using the van Elteren test and we will present Hodges-Lehmann median differences and confidence intervals. Binary outcomes will be analysed using logistic regression. To preserve a family-wise error rate of <0.05, we will use a Bonferroni-adjusted alfa of 0.05/6 = 0.0083 for all six pairwise comparisons between groups when analysing the primary outcome. We will systematically assess the underlying statistical assumptions for each analysis. Data will be analysed by two blinded independent statisticians, and we will write abstracts covering all possible combinations of conclusions, before breaking the blind. DISCUSSION: The RECIPE trial will provide important information on benefit and harm of combinations of the most frequently used non-opioid analgesics for pain after primary hip arthroplasty.

A randomized controlled trial on virtual reality distraction during venous cannulation in young children.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pain management in children is often inadequate, and the single most common painful procedure in children who are hospitalized is needle procedures. Virtual reality (VR) has been shown to decrease anxiety and pain in children undergoing painful procedures primarily in children from the age of 7 years. Our aim for this study is to investigate patient satisfaction and pain reduction by using a three-dimensional VR interactive game as a distraction in 4-7 years old children during venous cannulation. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, we enrolled 106 children aged 4-7 years who were scheduled for venous cannulation. Patients assigned to the control group were adherent to standard of care, including topical numbing cream, positioning, and distraction in this group by games of choice on a tablet/smartphone. In the study group, children were adherent to standard of care and were distracted by an interactive VR game. Primary outcomes were patient satisfaction and the procedural pain assessed by using Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale; secondary outcomes were the procedural time and any adverse events. RESULTS: We found an overall high level of patient satisfaction with our regime of topical numbing cream, positioning, and distraction. The primary outcome of pain during the procedure was median 20 mm (IQR 0-40) and 20 mm (IQR 0-55) (Wong-Baker 0-100 mm) in the VR group and the control group, respectively (difference: 0 mm, 95%CI: 0-20, p = .19). No significant difference was found in procedural times. The number of adverse effects was low, with no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: VR distraction is an acceptable form of distraction for children 4-7 years old when combined with topical numbing cream and positioning during preoperative venous cannulation. No difference was found between VR- and smartphone/tablet distraction.

Postoperative pain treatment after lumbar discectomy. A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing lumbar discectomy usually suffer from moderate to severe pain during the postoperative period. Multimodal, or balanced analgesia, is the leading treatment principle for managing postoperative pain. The rationale is to achieve optimal pain treatment through additive or synergistic effects of several non-opioid analgesics, and thereby, reducing the need for postoperative opioids, facilitating early mobilization and functional rehabilitation. For discectomy surgery, evidence of both the benefit and harm of different analgesic interventions is unclear. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aims to investigate the benefits and harms of analgesic interventions in adult patients after lumbar discectomy. METHODS: This protocol for a systematic review is written according to The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. We will search The Cochrane Library's CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrails.gov for published and ongoing trials. All randomized clinical trials assessing the postoperative analgesics effect of an intervention with a control or no-intervention group undergoing lumbar discectomy will be included. Two authors will independently screen trials for inclusion using Covidence, extract data and assess the risk of bias using Cochrane's risk-of-bias 2 tool. We will analyse the data using Review Manager and Trial Sequential Analysis. Meta-analysis will be performed according to the Cochrane guidelines. We will present our primary findings in a 'summary of findings' table and evaluate the overall certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will assess the benefits and harms of analgesic interventions after lumbar discectomy and have the potential to improve best practices and advance research.

The PANSAID randomized clinical trial: A pre-planned 1-year follow-up regarding harm.

BACKGROUND: Limiting harm from postoperative pain treatment is important. However, long-term follow-up from acute pain trials are rare. The aim of the study was to provide long-term follow-up data regarding harm from the "Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in Combination" (PANSAID) trial. METHODS: In this preplanned long-term follow-up study from the PANSAID trial, we used data from Danish national health registries (the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish Civil Registration System) in addition to the 90-day follow-up in the original trial. The primary outcome was 1-year proportion of patients with one or more serious adverse events. RESULTS: One-year follow-up was complete for 551 patients (99%). We found three additional patients with one or more serious adverse events in the 1-year follow-up compared with the 90-day follow-up. The relative risk of having one or more serious adverse event when randomized to ibuprofen compared with paracetamol was 1.40 (95% CI: 0.84-2.33, P = .20). CONCLUSION: We found no statistically significant difference in 1-year serious adverse events between patients randomized to ibuprofen compared with paracetamol in patients having planned primary total hip arthroplasty. There were few additional events from the 90-day follow-up to the 1-year follow-up.

DEX-2-TKA - DEXamethasone twice for pain treatment after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Detailed statistical analysis plan for a randomized, blinded, three-group multicentre clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Optimization of post-operative pain treatment is of upmost importance. Multimodal analgesia is the main post-operative pain treatment principle, but the evidence on optimal analgesic combinations is unclear. With the "DEXamethasone twice for pain treatment after TKA" trial, we aim to investigate the role of one or two doses of glucocorticoid for post-operative pain treatment after total knee arthroplasty. To ensure transparency and minimization of bias, we present this article with a detailed statistical analysis plan, to be published before the last participant is enrolled. METHODS: "DEXamethasone twice for pain treatment after TKA" (DEX-2-TKA) is a randomized, blinded, three-group multicentre clinical trial. Participants will be randomized to one of three intervention groups: single dose of iv dexamethasone 24 mg, two consecutive doses of iv dexamethasone 24 mg or matching iv placebo. All three intervention groups will receive paracetamol, NSAID (ibuprofen) and local infiltration analgesia. Participants, treatment providers, outcome assessors, data managers, statisticians and conclusion drawers will be blinded to the allocated intervention. The primary outcome is total opioid consumption (iv morphine milligram equivalents) 0-48 hours post-operatively. Secondary outcomes are (1) visual analogue scale pain levels: (a) during active 45 degrees flexion of the knee at 24 and 48 hours post-operatively, (b) at rest at 24 and 48 hours post-operatively, and (c) during 0-24 hours (highest score) and 24-48 hours post-operatively (highest score); and (2) the proportion of participants with one or more adverse events within 48 hours post-operatively. DISCUSSION: The DEX-2-TKA trial will provide high quality data regarding benefits and harms of adding one or two high-doses of dexamethasone to a multimodal analgesic regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2018-001099-39 (08/06-18); ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03506789 (24/04-2019).

DEX-2-TKA-DEXamethasone twice for pain treatment after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A protocol for a randomized, blinded, three-group multicentre clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal analgesia is considered the leading principle for post-operative pain treatment, but no gold standard after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) exists. AIM: To investigate the beneficial and harmful effects of one or two doses of 24 mg intravenous dexamethasone (DXM) as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen (paracetamol, NSAID and perioperative local infiltration analgesia) after TKA. We hypothesize that addition of DXM will reduce post-operative opioid consumption. METHODS: DEXamethasone twice for pain treatment after TKA is a randomized, blinded, three-group multicentre clinical trial. Participants will be randomized to one of three groups: placebo, single dose of DXM or two consecutive doses of DXM. Participants, treatment providers and investigators will be blinded to the allocated intervention. The primary outcome is total opioid consumption (units of morphine equivalents) 0-48 hours post-operatively. INCLUSION CRITERIA: unilateral, primary TKA; age ≥18 years; American Society of Anesthesiologists-Score 1-3; Body Mass Index ≥18 and ≤40; for women-not pregnant; and written informed consent. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: allergy or contraindications against trial medication; daily use of high dose opioid and/or use of methadone/transdermal opioids; daily use of systemic glucocorticoids; dysregulated diabetes; and patients suffering from alcohol and/or drug abuse. Four-hundred-and-eighty-six eligible participants are needed to detect or discard a difference of 10 mg morphine equivalents 0-48 hours post-operatively maintaining a familywise error rate of 0.05 and a power of 90% for the three possible pairwise comparisons. DISCUSSION: Recruiting is planned to commence September 2018 and expected to finish March 2020. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2018-001099-39 (08/06-18); ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03506789 (24/04-2019). Editorial Comment This is the protocol for the largest randomized clinical trial investigating the effect of one or two doses of dexamethasones on pain treatment after total knee arthroplasty. Due to the pragmatic and rigerous design this study will deliver results of high quality and external validity.

Benefits and harm of paracetamol and ibuprofen in combination for post-operative pain: Pre-planned subgroup analyses of the multicenter, randomized PANSAID trial.

BACKGROUND: The "Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in Combination" (PANSAID) trial showed that combining paracetamol and ibuprofen resulted in lower opioid consumption than each drug alone and we did not find an increase in risk of harm when using ibuprofen vs paracetamol. The aim of this subgroup analysis was to investigate the differences in benefits and harms of the interventions in different subgroups. We hypothesized that the intervention effects would differ in subgroups with different risk of pain or adverse events. METHODS: In these pre-planned subgroup analyses of the PANSAID trial population, we assessed subgroup heterogeneity in intervention effects between (a) subgroups (sex, age, use of analgesics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and type of anesthesia) and morphine consumption, and (b) subgroups (sex, age, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and ASA score) and serious adverse events. RESULTS: Test of interaction between age and the pairwise comparison between paracetamol 1 g vs paracetamol 0.5 g + ibuprofen 200 mg (P = .009) suggested lower morphine consumption in patients >65 years. However, post hoc analyses of related outcomes showed no interaction for this pairwise comparison. All other tests of interaction regarding both benefit and harm were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: These pre-planned subgroup analyses did not suggest that patients in the investigated subgroups benefitted differently from a basic non-opioid analgesic regimen consisting of paracetamol and ibuprofen. Further, there was no evidence of subgroup heterogeneity regarding harm and use of ibuprofen. Because of reduced statistical power in subgroup analyses, we cannot exclude clinically relevant subgroup heterogeneity.

Pain management after total hip arthroplasty at five different Danish hospitals: A prospective, observational cohort study of 501 patients.

BACKGROUND: The available literature does not present a "gold standard" for post-operative pain treatment after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this prospective observational study was to explore and document post-operative pain treatment, including outcomes, in a large cohort of patients undergoing THA at five different Danish hospitals. METHODS: This prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study of 501 THA patients was performed at five different hospitals in the Capital Region and at the Region Zealand in Denmark, from April 2014 to April 2016. The study had two co-primary outcomes: Pain during mobilisation at 6 hours post-operatively (numeric rating scale [NRS] [0-10]) and morphine consumption 0-24 hours post-operatively. RESULTS: A large variety of analgesic treatments were used at the included hospitals and none of the hospitals used the same non-opioid basic analgesic regimen. For all patients at all hospitals, the NRS-pain level during mobilisation at 6 hours was 5 (3-6), (median [interquartile range]) and the 24-hour intravenous morphine (eqv) consumption was 25 mg (18-35). Although some statistically significant differences between hospitals were found for morphine use, no non-opioid analgesic regimen demonstrated consistent clinically relevant superior efficacy. In general, pain levels at rest were low to moderate and pain during mobilisation was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Analgesic treatment routines differed between hospitals. Pain levels, however, did not differ substantially and were in general low at rest and moderate during mobilisation. No non-opioid analgesic treatment demonstrated consistent analgesic superiority.

Effect of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve-block on pain after total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common procedure associated with moderate postoperative pain. No nerve block without loss of motor function has been documented for THA. We hypothesised that an ultrasound-guided lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block added to a multimodal postoperative pain regimen would reduce postoperative pain after THA. METHODS: One hundred patients who had a THA by the posterior approach were evaluated in this randomised, placebo-controlled, blinded, parallel-group trial comparing an ultrasound-guided LFCN-block with either 8 ml of ropivacaine, 7.5 mg/ml, (Group Ropivacaine) or 8 ml of saline (Group Placebo) given postoperatively. Surgery was performed under spinal anaesthesia. The primary outcome was pain (measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)) 4 h post-blockade during 30° flexion of the hip. Secondary outcomes were pain at rest, pain during movement, oxycodone consumption (0-24 h), time to mobilisation, ability to mobilise, and length of stay. Patients, assessors and all staff involved with patient care were blinded to the intervention. RESULTS: There was no difference in primary outcome between Group Ropivacaine and Group Placebo (VAS 27 mm vs. 31 mm, p = 0.41; difference -5 mm (95% CI: -15 mm - +5 mm). No differences in any of the secondary outcomes were observed. No adverse events, or harms, were observed during the trial. CONCLUSION: Pain scores, opioid use, time to mobilisation, and length of stay were low in both Group Ropivacaine and Group Placebo. We found no added analgesic effect of a LFCN-block when combined with paracetamol and ibuprofen after THA by the posterior approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2013-004501-12 (December 16th 2013).

The most important reason for lack of organ donation is family refusal.

INTRODUCTION: There is a worldwide shortage of organs for transplantation. This survey aims to compare two periods in the 2000s at a large neuro-intensive care unit with respect to de facto organ donors, potential organ donors and reasons for non-donation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This survey is a retrospective examination of all patients who died in the Neuro-intensive Care Unit at Rigshospitalet from 1/1 2000 to 30/6 2003 ("the first period") and from 1/1 2007 to 30/6 2010 ("the second period"). RESULTS: The number of patients who died in the Neuro-intensive Care Unit was 350 in the first period and 270 in the second period. Approximately half of all deceased patients in a neuro-intensive care unit are potential organ donors. Of the potential donors, 42 (27%) in the first and 48 (37%) in the second period became de facto donors. The main reason for non-donation among potential organ donors was lack of consent from next of kin (44% and 40%). The median time from brain death to recovery of organs in the second period was 5 h 45 m. DISCUSSION: The conversion rate tends to rise. Few people took an active standing against organ donation (10% and 2%); yet many family members refused to consent to organ donation. Consent was provided by the deceased in only 12% and 21% of the cases. The Danish organ procurement team is highly effective with a median time from brain death to recovery of organs of 5 h 45 m. FUNDING: not relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.