Prevalence of and risk factors for self-reported menstrual changes following COVID-19 vaccination: a Danish cohort study.

STUDY QUESTION: Are there some characteristics that render individuals more susceptible to report menstrual changes following the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination? SUMMARY ANSWER: We found that 30% of menstruating women reported menstrual changes following COVID-19 vaccination and several potential risk factors including stress, vaccine concerns, severe COVID-19 infection, and immediate vaccine symptoms were associated with these reports. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Studies suggest that COVID-19 vaccination might temporarily prolong menstrual cycle length by less than 1 day. Specific characteristics may trigger menstrual changes in temporal relation to the vaccination simply by chance or render women more vigilant to potential menstrual changes after being vaccinated. However, research investigating potential risk factors for reporting menstrual changes following COVID-19 vaccination is limited. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A population-based Danish cohort study. Data were collected from May 2021 to December 2021 as a part of the BiCoVac Cohort with the aim of examining non-specific effects following COVID-19 vaccination. The main study population included 13 648 menstruating women aged 16-65 years who completed all surveys, received their first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine during the data collection period, and completed questions related to their menstrual cycle. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Potential risk factors included 14 biological, physical, or psychological measures. Information on most potential risk factors was self-reported and collected before the participants' first COVID-19 vaccination. Information about any menstrual change following COVID-19 vaccination was self-reported at the end of the data collection period. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs for the association between each potential risk factor and reporting menstrual changes following COVID-19 vaccination. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Any menstrual change following COVID-19 vaccination was reported by 30% of menstruating women. Most of the potential risk factors were associated with reports of menstrual changes following COVID-19 vaccination. In particular, higher odds were found among women who reported ≥5 immediate vaccine symptoms; OR 1.67 [1.50-1.86], had had a prior severe COVID-19 infection; OR 2.17 [1.40-3.35], had a high-stress level at baseline; OR 1.67 [1.32-2.10], or were concerned about COVID-19 vaccines prior to vaccination; OR 1.92 [1.50-2.45]. Lower odds were found among women with regular menstrual cycles using hormonal contraception; OR 0.71 [0.65-0.78]. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We were unable to address the causal effect of COVID-19 vaccination on the reported menstrual changes, as information about menstrual changes was not available among non-vaccinated women. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The study identified several potential risk factors for reporting menstrual changes following COVID-19 vaccination. Further studies are needed to establish causal associations and the clinical impact of self-reported menstrual changes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The BiCoVac data collection was funded by TrygFonden (id-number: 153678). No competing interests are declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Immediate adverse reactions following COVID-19 vaccination among 16-65-year-old Danish citizens.

INTRODUCTION: There is sparse knowledge of immediate adverse reactions following COVID-19 vaccination. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the frequency and number of immediate adverse reactions following COVID-19 vaccination in a Danish population. METHODS: The study used data from the Danish population-based cohort study BiCoVac. The frequencies of 20 self-reported adverse reactions were estimated for each vaccine dose stratified by sex, age, and vaccine type. Also, the distributions of number of adverse reactions following each dose were estimated stratified by sex, age, vaccine type, and prior COVID-19 infection. RESULTS: A total of 889,503 citizens were invited and 171,008 (19 %) vaccinated individuals were included in the analysis. The most frequently reported adverse reaction following the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine was redness and/or pain at the injection site (20 %) while following the second and third dose, tiredness was the most frequently reported adverse reaction (22 % and 14 %, respectively). Individuals aged 26-35 years, females, and those with a prior COVID-19 infection were more likely to report adverse reactions compared with older individuals, males, and those with no prior COVID-19 infection, respectively. Following the first dose, individuals vaccinated with ChAdOx1-2 (AstraZeneca) reported more adverse reactions compared with individuals vaccinated with other vaccine types. Individuals vaccinated with mRNA-1273 (Moderna) reported more adverse reactions following the second and third dose compared with individuals vaccinated with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech). CONCLUSION: The frequency of immediate adverse reactions was highest among females and younger persons, however, most of the Danish citizens did not experience immediate adverse reactions following COVID-19 vaccination.

Coverage and factors associated with receiving campaign polio vaccines in an urban population in Guinea-Bissau.

BACKGROUND: Polio eradication campaigns are intended to complement routine immunization. Studies addressing factors associated with campaign coverage are warranted to identify children missed by campaigns. METHODS: Bandim Health Project runs demographic surveillance with registration of routine immunization and campaign participation data in urban Guinea-Bissau. We assessed coverage and factors associated with receiving campaign polio vaccines in children aged 0-35 months in two polio eradication campaigns conducted in 2017 and 2018 using univariate and multivariate regression models. RESULTS: Campaign coverage reached 84% in 2017 and 88% in 2018. We found lower coverage among children of young and not formally educated mothers in univariate analyses; Children <9 months and Fula children had lower campaign coverage in both univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: To increase campaign coverage in urban Guinea-Bissau attention may be directed at informing young mothers, mothers of young children, mothers without formal education, and the Fula ethnic group about campaigns.

Research protocol of two concurrent cluster-randomized trials: Real-life Effect of a CAMPaign with Measles Vaccination (RECAMP-MV) and Real-life Effect of a CAMPaign with Oral Polio Vaccination (RECAMP-OPV) on mortality and morbidity among children in rural Guinea-Bissau.

BACKGROUND: Measles and oral polio vaccinations may reduce child mortality to an extent that cannot be explained by prevention of measles and polio infections; these vaccines seem to have beneficial non-specific effects. In the last decades, billions of children worldwide have received measles vaccine (MV) and oral polio vaccine (OPV) through campaigns. Meanwhile the under-five child mortality has declined. Past MV and OPV campaigns may have contributed to this decline, even in the absence of measles and polio infections. However, cessation of these campaigns, once their targeted infections are eradicated, may reverse the decline in the under-five child mortality. No randomized trial has assessed the real-life effect of either campaign on child mortality and morbidity. We present the research protocol of two concurrent trials: RECAMP-MV and RECAMP-OPV. METHODS: Both trials are cluster-randomized trials among children registered in Bandim Health Project's rural health and demographic surveillance system throughout Guinea-Bissau. RECAMP-MV is conducted among children aged 9-59 months and RECAMP-OPV is conducted among children aged 0-8 months. We randomized 222 geographical clusters to intervention or control clusters. In intervention clusters, children are offered MV or OPV (according to age at enrolment) and a health check-up. In control clusters, children are offered only a health check-up. Enrolments began in November 2016 (RECAMP-MV) and March 2017 (RECAMP-OPV). We plan 18,000 enrolments for RECAMP-MV with an average follow-up period of 18 months and 10,000 enrolments for RECAMP-OPV with an average follow-up period of 10 months. Data collection is ongoing. The primary outcome in both trials is non-accidental death or non-accidental first non-fatal hospitalization with overnight stay (composite outcome). Secondary outcomes are: non-accidental death, repeated non-fatal hospitalizations with overnight stay, cause-specific primary outcome, outpatient visit, and illness. We obtained ethical approval from Guinea-Bissau and consultative approval from Denmark. DISCUSSION: Cluster randomization and minimum risk of loss to follow-up are strengths, and no placebo a limitation. Our trials challenge the understanding that MV and OPV only prevent measles and polio, and that once both infections are eradicated, campaigns with MV and OPV can be phased out without negative implications on child health and survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03460002.

A general measles vaccination campaign in urban Guinea-Bissau: Comparing child mortality among participants and non-participants.

BACKGROUND: Measles vaccination campaigns targeting children aged 9-59months are conducted every three years in Guinea-Bissau. Studies have demonstrated beneficial non-specific effects of measles vaccine. We compared mortality one year after the December 2012 measles vaccination campaign in Bissau city for children who received campaign measles vaccine with children who did not receive campaign measles vaccine. METHODS: Field workers from Bandim Health Project registered all children living in the Bandim Health Project's study area who received measles vaccination at the campaign posts. Children not seen during the campaign were visited at home and campaign participation status was assessed. We compared mortality rates of participants vs. non-participants in Cox regression models. RESULTS: 5633 children aged 9-59months (85%) received campaign measles vaccination and 1006 (15%) did not. During the subsequent year 16 children died. Adjusted for background factors, the hazard ratio (HR) comparing measles vaccinated versus unvaccinated was 0.28 (95% CI: 0.10-0.77). The benefit was larger for girls (HR: 0.17 (0.05-0.59)) and for children who had received routine measles vaccine before the campaign (HR: 0.15 (0.04-0.63)). CONCLUSIONS: We found indications of strong beneficial non-specific effects of receiving measles vaccine during the 2012 campaign, especially for girls and children with previous routine measles vaccination. Measles vaccination campaigns may be an effective way of improving child survival.

Loss of Frzb and Sfrp1 differentially affects joint homeostasis in instability-induced osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the specific role of Frizzled-related protein (FRZB) and Secreted frizzled-related protein 1 (SFRP1) in the onset and progression of Osteoarthritis (OA) using Frzb(-/-) and Sfrp1(-/-) mice in the destabilization of medial meniscus model (DMM), a slowly progressing model of OA. Secreted frizzled-related proteins (SFRPs) were identified as secreted Wingless-type (Wnt) antagonists. The Wnt signaling cascade is a major regulator in cartilage development, homeostasis and degeneration. METHODS: The DMM model was surgically induced in eight-week-old male C57/Bl6 Frzb(-/-), Sfrp1(-/-) or wild-type mice by transection of the medial meniscotibial ligament. Cartilage damage in the femoral and tibial articular surfaces was calculated following the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) histopathology initiative guidelines. Histomorphometry was used to evaluate the subchondral bone plate thickness. RESULTS: OA severity scores were significantly higher in the tibia of Frzb(-/-) mice as compared to littermates, whereas no interaction was seen between genotype and intervention in Sfrp1(-/-) mice. Moreover, the DMM model resulted in significantly greater subchondral bone changes compared to sham but was not different between Frzb(-/-) mice and littermates. In contrast, the subchondral bone properties in Sfrp1(-/-) mice were significantly different from littermates. CONCLUSION: Using the DMM model, we demonstrated that FRZB and SFRP1 differentially modulate joint homeostasis in two distinct compartments of the joint. These data highlight the fine-tuning of Wnt signaling in joint homeostasis and disease, show differential regulation of the cascade in cartilage and subchondral bone, and provide further evidence for a role of endogenous Wnt modulators as key players in OA.