ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To identify subgroups of patients with early-stage (pT1-2N0M0) oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) who may benefit from postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 528 patients diagnosed between October 2009 and December 2021. Clinicopathological characteristics and treatments with or without PORT were analyzed for their impact on outcomes. RESULTS: Among 528 patients who underwent radical surgery (median age, 62 years [IQR, 52-69]), 145 (27.5%) also underwent PORT. Multivariate analyses revealed that PORT was associated with improved survival outcomes, whereas moderate-to-poor differentiation, perineural infiltration (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and increasing depth of invasion (DOI) were associated with poorer survival outcomes. For patients with moderate-to-poor differentiation, the surgery + PORT group showed improved outcomes compared with the surgery-alone group. After propensity score matching, the results were as follows: overall survival (OS), 97% versus 69%, P = .003; disease-free survival (DFS), 88% versus 50%, P = .001. After excluding cases with PNI/LVI, the differences persisted: OS, 97% versus 82%, P = .040; DFS, 87% versus 64%, P = .012. Similar survival benefits were observed in 104 patients with PNI and/or LVI (OS, 81% v 58%; P = .022; DFS, 76% v 47%; P = .002). In subgroups with DOI >5 mm or close margins, PORT contributed to improved DFS (80% v 64%; P = .006; 92% v 66%; P = .049) but did not significantly affect OS. CONCLUSION: Patients with moderately-to-poorly differentiated pT1-2N0M0 OTSCC benefited from PORT. Our study provided evidence that patients with PNI and/or LVI who underwent PORT had improved survival. PORT also offered DFS benefit among patients with DOI >5 mm.
Subject(s)
Neoplasm Staging , Tongue Neoplasms , Humans , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Tongue Neoplasms/pathology , Tongue Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Tongue Neoplasms/surgery , Tongue Neoplasms/mortality , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/surgery , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/mortality , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapyABSTRACT
The aim of the current study was to evaluate the influence of severe radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) on the outcomes of esophageal cancer (EC). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed through the PRISMA guideline. Seventeen studies were included in the current systematic review, with eight included in the meta-analyses. Meta-analyses found that severe RIL was associated with lower pathologic complete response (pCR) rate (odds ratio (OR) = 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.30-0.66, I2 = 0%), inferior overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.29-1.75, I2 = 6%), and worse progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.39-2.07, I2 = 0%) of EC patients. The lymphocyte nadir was found during 4-6 weeks after the start of radiotherapy. The leading dosimetric factors associated with severe RIL included larger PTV, higher dose to heart and body, and higher effective dose to the immune cells (EDIC). Clinical risk factors for RIL mainly comprised lower baseline ALC, higher tumor length and clinical stage, and distal EC. In conclusion, severe RIL might be associated with a lower pCR rate and worse OS and PFS of EC patients. Minimizing the dosimetric risk factors, especially in patients with clinical risk factors, might benefit their outcomes.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Radiotherapy is a key part of head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. Radiation induced lymphopenia (RIL) is a severe complication of radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic role of RIL in HNC patients. METHOD: We conducted a PRISMA guideline based systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies were identified on the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library from 2007 to October 2021. The quality of each study was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form for Cohort Studies (NOS). RESULTS: There were 8 studies with 2,733 samples finally included in current study. The meta-analysis showed that the odds ratio of developing grade 3-4 RIL was 13.49 (95%CI = 7.03-25.89, I2 = 94%). The incidence rate of grade 3-4 RIL ranged from 73%-88%. Multivariate meta-analysis found that the RIL significantly decreased the overall survival (HR = 2.94, 95%CI = 1.83-4.74, I2 = 0%) and distant metastasis free survival of HNC (HR = 3.79, 95%CI = 2.06-6.97, I2 = 0%). After sensitivity analysis and excluding a potential study that caused heterogeneity, the new pooled multivariate meta-analysis showed RIL was a risk factor to the progression free survival of HNC patients (HR = 3.16, 95%CI = 1.77-5.63, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: This is the first meta-analysis which showed severe RIL decreased the overall survival and promoted the progression of HNC patients. Future large-scale prospective studies are required to evaluate the association between severe RIL and the prognosis of HNC.
