ABSTRACT
Background: Although clinicians and patients with extremity bone and soft tissue (EBST) are increasingly interested in limb salvage surgery (LSS), because of the minimal damage to physical appearance and function, however, there is still a lack of large-scale population studies on whether LSS improves the prognosis of patients. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the survival of patients with EBST sarcomas after receiving LSS and amputation. Methods: To conduct the population-based study, we identified 6,717 patients with a histologically diagnosed bone sarcoma and 24,378 patients with a histologically diagnosed soft tissue sarcoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. We analyzed overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and non-sarcoma survival (NSS) using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test or Gray test, Cox regression model, propensity score-matched analysis, and landmark analysis. Results: LSS could improve the prognosis in patients with most EBST subtypes, except for Ewing sarcomas and MPNST. However, in the subgroup without distant metastases, limb salvage increased CSS only for patients with osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma, as well as NSS for patients with chondrosarcoma and synovial sarcoma. Landmark analysis further demonstrated that sarcoma survivors surviving <10 years could benefit from LSS but not for long-term survivors ≥10 years. Moreover, for patients with distant metastases, LSS could improve survival of osteosarcoma patients but worsen CSS among patients with MPNST. Landmark analysis further demonstrated that LSS improved survival among osteosarcomas patients with distant metastases only within 1 year after surgery. Moreover, patients receiving LSS and those receiving amputation had a high risk of dying from different non-sarcoma diseases during the postoperative follow-up. Conclusions: The impact of limb salvage on the prognosis of patients depends on the pathological subtype and stage of EBST sarcomas.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: (I) To determine whether patients with malignant bone tumors had a higher risk of dying from pneumonia compared with the general US population; (II) to identify the independent risk factor associated with fatal pneumonia among these patients. METHODS: We identified 18,583 patients diagnosed with primary malignant bone tumors between 1973 and 2016 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated based on the mortality data of the general population gathered by the National Center for Health Statistics, which provided the risk of death from pneumonia among cancer patients relative to that of the general population. Given that other causes of death were considered as competing events, we also designed the Fine-Gray model to identify demographic and tumor-related characteristics associated with a higher risk of dying from pneumonia among these patients. RESULTS: Patients with primary malignant bone tumors had a higher risk of dying from pneumonia than the general population after adjusting the distribution difference of age, sex, and race among them (SMR =2.79; 95% CI: 2.17-3.59). The older age, Black and earlier period of diagnosis were found to be the independent prognostic factor for a higher risk of death from pneumonia for these patients. Additionally, amputation due to malignant bone tumors significantly increased the risk of death from pneumonia compared with non-surgery. The highest mortality rate of pneumonia was observed among patients with chordoma. Interaction tests demonstrated that amputation only increased the relative risk of fatal pneumonia among patients with osteosarcoma. Throughout the follow-up period, the mortality rate of fatal pneumonia was the highest within the first year after diagnosis, and the highest relative suicide risks persisted over time in patients with osteosarcoma. CONCLUSIONS: To mitigate the risk of fatal pneumonia among patients with bone tumors, we call for long-term clinical monitoring of the lung condition among these patients, especially for those after amputation for bone tumors.
