The efficacy and safety analysis of bortezomib retreatment in 76 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma / 中华血液学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bortezomib retreatment in 76 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), who previously responded to bortezomib.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Retrospective analysis of 76 MM patients, who had achieved at least a partial response (PR) on initial bortezomib therapy in our hospital from May 2006 to August 2011, received bortezomib retreatment when they relapsed or progressed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The overall response rate (ORR) was 60.5%, among them 6.5% patients achieved CR, 5.8% patients achieved very good partial response (VGPR), 38.2% patients achieved PR. Then we further stratified all patients into 3 groups according to the response of initial bortezomib therapy, including CR group, VGPR group and PR group. After bortezomib retreatment, the ORR of the 3 groups was 84.6%, 73.1% and 43.2%, respectively. According to the response of bortezomib retreatment, the patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 who at least achieved PR, group 2 who showed no response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) after bortezomib retreatment for group 1 and 2 was 7(1-39) and 5(1-14) months, respectively (P>0.05), while the median overall survival (OS) after bortezomib retreatment was 16(2-64) and 8(1-28) months, respectively (P<0.05). Adverse events (AE) were identified in 88% patients during bortezomib retreatment, including neutropenia, diarrhea and thrombocytopenia, only 9.2%(7 patients) reached Ⅲ-Ⅳ grade of AE. Severe peripheral neuropathy occurred in only one patient.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Bortezomib retreatment regimen is demonstrated a higher response rate in patients who achieved deeper response in initial treatment, with no more adverse events.</p>

Busulfan, cyclophosphamide and etoposide as conditioning for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma / 中华血液学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dose-reduced intravenous busulfan, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (BCV) as conditioning for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From September 2007 to September 2010, thirty-two ASCT-eligible patients with MM received high dose melphalan (HDM) as conditioning in our center. Median age was 53.5 (30-63) years. From October 2010 to October 2012, thirty-eight patients conditioned by BCV regimen (intravenous busulfan, total doses 9.6 mg/kg), whose median age was 54(35-64) years.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were no statistical differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups, including myeloma isotype, Durie-Salmon staging, international staging system(ISS), and patients received the first line, second line or more than third line therapy. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 10.5 vs 11 days (P=0.057) and 11 vs 12 days (P=0.100) in the BCV and HDM groups, respectively. The toxicity of two conditioning regimens had no significant difference. None of hepatic veno-occlusive disease and early transplant related mortality was observed. Although overall response rates showed no significant difference between two groups (P>0.05), the CR rates increased from 44.74% pre-ASCT to 63.18% post-ASCT in the BCV group, while 37.50% to 59.38% in the HDM group. During the median follow-up of 16 months (range 2-27) in BCV group, ten patients (26.32%) developed progressive disease and PFS at 12 months were 71.37%.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>In this study, the dose-reduced intravenous busulfan, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (BCV) conditioning was demonstrated an effective and safety regimen for ASCT-eligible patients with MM. However, the long term observation is needed.</p>