Agitation is a Common Barrier to Recovery of ICU Patients.

Importance: Agitation is common in mechanically ventilated ICU patients, but little is known about physician attitudes regarding agitation in this setting. Objectives: To characterize physician attitudes regarding agitation in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: We surveyed critical care physicians within a multicenter health system in Western Pennsylvania, assessing attitudes regarding agitation during mechanical ventilation and use of and confidence in agitation management options. We used quantitative clinical vignettes to determine whether agitation influences confidence regarding readiness for extubation. We sent our survey to 332 critical care physicians, of whom 80 (24%) responded and 69 were eligible (had cared for a mechanically ventilated patient in the preceding three months). Main Outcomes and Measures: Respondent confidence in patient readiness for extubation (0-100%, continuous) and frequency of use and confidence in management options (1-5, Likert). Results: Of 69 eligible responders, 61 (88%) agreed agitation is common and 49 (71%) agreed agitation is a barrier to extubation, but only 27 (39%) agreed their approach to agitation is evidence-based. Attitudes regarding agitation did not differ much by practice setting or physician demographics, though respondents working in medical ICUs were more likely (P = .04) and respondents trained in surgery or emergency medicine were less likely (P = .03) than others to indicate that agitation is an extubation barrier. Fifty-three (77%) respondents reported they frequently use non-pharmacologic measures to treat agitation, and 42 (70%) of those who reported they used non-pharmacologic measures during the prior 3 months indicated confidence in their effectiveness. In responses to clinical vignettes, confidence in patient's readiness for extubation was significantly lower if the patient was agitated (P < .001) or tachypneic (P < .001), but the presence of both agitation and tachypnea did not reduce confidence compared with tachypnea alone (P = .24). Conclusions and Relevance: Most critical care physicians consider agitation during mechanical ventilation a common problem and agreed that agitation is a barrier to extubation. Treatment practice varies widely.

Pharmacologic Management of Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit.

Delirium, often underdiagnosed in the intensive care unit, is a common complication of critical illness that contributes to significant morbidity and mortality. Clinicians should be aware of common risk factors and triggers and should work to mitigate these as much as possible to reduce the occurrence of delirium. This review first provides an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, evaluation, and consequences of delirium in critically ill patients. Presented next is the current evidence for the pharmacologic management of delirium, focusing on prevention and treatment of delirium in the intensive care unit. It concludes by outlining some emerging treatments of delirium.

Treatment of Delirium During Critical Illness.

Delirium, an acute disturbance in mental status due to another medical condition, is common and morbid in the intensive care unit. Despite its clear association with multiple common risk factors and important outcomes, including mortality and long-term cognitive impairment, both the ultimate causes of and ideal treatments for delirium remain unclear. Studies suggest that neuroinflammation, hypoxia, alterations in energy metabolism, and imbalances in multiple neurotransmitter pathways contribute to delirium, but commonly used treatments (e.g., antipsychotic medications) target only one or a few of these potential mechanisms and are not supported by evidence of efficacy. At this time, the optimal treatment for delirium during critical illness remains avoidance of risk factors, though ongoing trials may expand on the promise shown by agents such as melatonin and dexmedetomidine.

A Cross-sectional Survey of Internal Medicine Resident Knowledge, Attitudes, Behaviors, and Experiences Regarding Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Infection.

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV is effective, yet many providers continue to lack knowledge and comfort in providing this intervention. It remains unclear whether internal medicine (IM) residents receive appropriate training in PrEP care and if this affects their future practices. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the relationship between current IM residents' prior PrEP training and knowledge, comfort, and practice regarding the provision of PrEP. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We created an online survey to assess IM residents' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to PrEP. The survey was distributed among five IM programs across the USA. KEY RESULTS: We had a 35% response rate. Of 229 respondents, 96% (n = 220) had heard of PrEP but only 25% (n = 51) had received prior training and 11% (n = 24) had prescribed PrEP. Compared with those without, those with prior training reported good to excellent knowledge scores regarding PrEP (80% versus 33%, p < 0.001), more frequent prescribing (28% versus 7%, p = 0.001), and higher comfort levels with evaluating risk for HIV, educating patients, and monitoring aspects of PrEP (75% versus 26%, 56% versus 16%, and 47% versus 8%, respectively; all p values < 0.0001). While only 25% (n = 51) had received prior training, 75% (n = 103) of respondents reported that training all providers at their continuity clinic sites would improve implementation. CONCLUSIONS: We found that prior training was associated with higher levels of self-reported PrEP knowledge, comfort, and prescribing behaviors. Given the significant need for PrEP, IM residents should be trained to achieve adequate knowledge and comfort levels to prescribe it. This study demonstrates that providing appropriate PrEP training for IM residents may lead to an increase in the pool of graduating IM residents prescribing PrEP.

Prevalence and Correlates of Unhealthy Alcohol and Drug Use Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Prescribed HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in Real-World Clinical Settings.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective in preventing HIV acquisition among men who have sex with men (MSM). However, little is known about unhealthy substance use among MSM initiating PrEP in real-world settings. Unhealthy substance use is a risk factor for HIV acquisition and non-adherence to treatment, and may also impact PrEP use. MSM who were prescribed PrEP from 2015 to 2017 at clinics in Providence, Rhode Island and New Haven, Connecticut were recruited to participate in a prospective observational study. Structured clinical assessments were used to assess demographics, HIV risk behaviors, and unhealthy alcohol (alcohol use disorders identification test [AUDIT]-C scores ≥ 4) and drug use (use of any drugs in the past 3 months). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine demographics and behaviors associated with unhealthy alcohol and drug use. Among 172 MSM initiating PrEP, 64% were white and 40% were 25-34 years old. Participants reported a median of 3 (IQR 2-7) sexual partners in the last 3 months; 20% reported an HIV positive partner. Unhealthy alcohol and any drug use were reported by 54 and 57%, respectively, and 76% reported at least one of the two. The majority of drug use reported was marijuana and poppers (41 and 26% of participants, respectively). Relative to those without unhealthy alcohol use, unhealthy alcohol use was independently associated with any drug use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.57, 95% CI 1.32-5.01). Frequent drug use was associated with younger age (< 25 years, AOR 4.27, 95% CI 1.51-12.09). Unhealthy alcohol use is common among MSM taking PrEP. Drug use other than marijuana and poppers was uncommon among our cohort. Further efforts may be needed to understand the influence of unhealthy alcohol and other substance use on PrEP outcomes and to engage MSM who use drugs for PrEP.

CD8 T-Cell Lymphocytosis and Associated Clinical Syndromes in HIV-Infected Patients.

An inverted CD4:CD8 T lymphocyte ratio is frequently observed in individuals infected with HIV. A subset of these individuals develops an exuberant and persistent CD8 T-cell lymphocytosis response to HIV infection that may occur despite virologic suppression on treatment and has been associated with adverse clinical effects and disorders. This review describes clinical syndromes that have been reported primarily in HIV-infected individuals with CD8 T-cell lymphocytosis including their presentation, management, and clinical outcomes where known.