Trends in the delivery of elective general paediatric surgery.

INTRODUCTION: There has been regular dialogue regarding the importance of developing clinical networks to compensate for the steady decline in general paediatric surgery performed by adult surgeons. Despite this dialogue, there are no contemporary published data to quantify the issue. This report documents patterns in delivery of general paediatric surgery in England and shows what is being performed where and by whom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Surgical Workload Outcome Database, we compared hospital-level data between 2009 and 2017. Inclusion criteria were children under 18 years admitted to NHS hospitals in England for elective general paediatric surgery. Data were analysed with an online statistical package performing paired t-tests. RESULTS: There was no real change in the overall number of elective general paediatric surgical marker cases, but the type mix has changed. The number of marker cases performed by adult surgeons fell by 34% (4699 vs 3090 p < 0.05). The number of marker cases performed by specialist paediatric surgeons increased by 21% (8184 vs 9862 p < 0.05). This increase in workload occurred in both tertiary (21% increase) and peripheral (18% increase) centres. When analysing data by operation type it was apparent that 78% of the increased workload was attributable to an increase in orchidopexy rate. CONCLUSION: Best practice is to treat children close to home by staff with the right skills. This study shows significant shifts in the general paediatric surgical workload. It is important to monitor these trends for successful succession planning as well as configuration of services.

Outcome of appendicectomy in children performed in paediatric surgery units compared with general surgery units.

BACKGROUND: Appendicectomy for acute appendicitis in children may be performed in specialist centres by paediatric surgeons or in general surgery units. Service provision and outcome of appendicectomy in children may differ between such units. METHODS: This multicentre observational study included all children (aged less than 16 years) who had an appendicectomy at either a paediatric surgery unit or general surgery unit. The primary outcome was normal appendicectomy rate (NAR). Secondary outcomes included 30-day adverse events, use of ultrasound imaging and laparoscopy, and consultant involvement in procedures. RESULTS: Appendicectomies performed in 19 paediatric surgery units (242 children) and 54 general surgery units (461 children) were included. Children treated in paediatric surgery units were younger and more likely to have a preoperative ultrasound examination, a laparoscopic procedure, a consultant present at the procedure, and histologically advanced appendicitis than children treated in general surgery units. The unadjusted NAR was significantly lower in paediatric surgery units (odds ratio (OR) 0.37, 95 per cent confidence interval 0.23 to 0.59; P < 0.001), and the difference persisted after adjusting for age, sex and use of preoperative ultrasound imaging (OR 0.34, 0.21 to 0.57; P < 0.001). Female sex and preoperative ultrasonography, but not age, were significantly associated with normal appendicectomy in general surgery units but not in paediatric surgery units in this adjusted model. The unadjusted 30-day adverse event rate was higher in paediatric surgery units than in general surgery units (OR 1.90, 1.18 to 3.06; P = 0.011). When adjusted for case mix and consultant presence at surgery, no statistically significant relationship between centre type and 30-day adverse event rate existed (OR 1.59, 0.93 to 2.73; P = 0.091). CONCLUSION: The NAR in general surgery units was over twice that in paediatric surgery units. Despite a more severe case mix, paediatric surgery units had a similar 30-day adverse event rate to general surgery units. Service provision differs between paediatric and general surgery units.