The role of bisphosphonates in the treatment of painful metastatic bone disease: a review of phase III trials.

Metastatic bone disease is a frequent cause of morbidity in advanced cancer patients with a subsequent high incidence of skeletal complications (fractures, hypercalcemia, spinal cord compression) and severe pain. The osteolytic process is mainly characterized by an osteoclastic activity of bone resorption and inflammatory activity provoked by various cytokines and prostaglandins. Bisphosphonates represent a new class of drugs with inhibitory activity on bone resorption and on inflammatory processes which revealed themselves to be efficacious in a series of clinical conditions such as tumour-induced hypercalcemia, Paget's disease, osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease. The aim of this review of the literature is to show the analgesic efficacy of the different bisphosphonates in phase III studies carried out on patients with metastatic bone disease. Medline and Cancerlit database from January 1984 to February 1998 have been considered. From the analysis of the published studies it appears that bisphosphonates and, in particular, intravenous Disodium Pamidronate, are not only able to slow down the progression of the disease and to reduce the onset of skeletal complications but also have an analgesic effect and the possibility of improving the quality of life, above all in patients with osteolytic metastases due to breast cancer and multiple myeloma. Bisphosphonates represent a further valid therapy to add to an already consolidated list of therapies such as radio, chemo and endocrine therapy, analgesic drugs, orthopaedic and physiatric in the pain management of patients with bone metastases. These drugs meet with the patients' compliance, are well-tolerated as well as having a good cost/efficacy profile. It still remains to be seen if the newer and more potent bisphosphonates such as Ibandronate and Zoledronate can be administered differently from the intravenous route such as by mouth or by patch which are readily accepted by the patient and, moreover, if these more potent drugs are able to prevent or delay the onset and/or the progression of bone metastases.

Role of pamidronate disodium in the treatment of metastatic bone disease.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Bone metastases are a common feature of advanced neoplastic disease and are considered to be among the most frequent causes of pain and complications in oncologic patients. The main objective of the treatment of such patients is to control their symptoms and improve their quality of life. Pamidronate disodium is a second-generation bisphosphonate capable of inhibiting bone resorption (particularly osteoclast activity) without affecting bone remineralization. After a brief introduction concerning the pathophysiology of bone metastases and neoplastic bone pain, we herein present data on the clinical pharmacology and toxicity of bisphosphonates in general, and pamidronate in particular. We conclude by reviewing the literature on the use of pamidronate in phase II and III trials involving patients with metastatic bone disease. METHODS: The paper is based on a review of articles published between 1984 and 1997 selected from the Cancerline and Medline databases. RESULTS: In the considered phase II and III studies involving patients with bone metastases (breast cancer and multiple myeloma in particular), pamidronate proved to be efficacious in reducing the incidence of pain and skeletal complications, decreasing the excretion of metabolic markers of bone resorption and improving the quality of life. Intravenous infusions of 60-90 mg over a period of 2 hr every 3-4 weeks did not cause any significant toxic effects and was easily managed. CONCLUSIONS: Pamidronate is a bisphosphonate that is efficacious in the treatment of symptomatic bone metastases and can be considered an important therapeutic option in association with systemic treatments, radiotherapy and normal supportive care, especially in patients with breast cancer and multiple myeloma. Further randomized studies are necessary to confirm the positive preliminary results in other neoplasms, analyze the cost/benefit ratio of the treatment, and verify the possibility that, in addition to being used for palliative purposes, pamidronate may also prevent or delay the appearance of bone metastases.

Investigation on the mechanisms involved in the central protective effect of amylin on gastric ulcers in rats.

1. The mechanisms involved in the protective effect of amylin (administered into the brain ventricle, i.c.v.) on gastric ulcers induced by the oral administration of ethanol 50% (EtOH, 2 ml/rat) or indomethacin (indomethacin, 20 mg kg(-1), at a dosing volume of 5 ml) were investigated in rats. 2. The possible involvement of endogenous nitric oxide (NO) in the beneficial effect of amylin against EtOH-induced ulcers was examined. The inhibitor of NO-synthesis, NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 70 mg kg(-1), s.c.) was injected 30 min before amylin (2.2 microg/rat, i.c.v.) followed by EtOH after a further 30 min. Rats were sacrificed 1 h after EtOH. L-NAME completely removed the protective effect of amylin. 3. The interaction between amylin and gastric nonprotein sulfhydryl groups was studied. The rats were treated with N-ethyl-maleimide (NEM, 25 mg kg(-1), s.c.) 30 min before amylin (2.2 microg/rat, i.c.v.) followed by EtOH 30 min after or by indomethacin 5 min after amylin. Rats were sacrificed 1 h or 6 h respectively after EtOH or indomethacin. NEM counteracted the protective effect of amylin against EtOH-induced ulcers but not against those provoked by indomethacin. 4. To determine whether amylin was able to promote ulcer healing, the peptide was injected 5 min after EtOH or 1 h after indomethacin. In the case of EtOH, the beneficial effect of amylin was lost whereas it was still effective on indomethacin-induced ulcers. 5. The results indicate that: the mechanisms involved in the antiulcer effects of amylin are different in these two types of gastric lesions probably because of the different etiopathology of various types of ulcers. Endogenous NO and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups are involved in the mucosal protective effects of amylin on EtOH and not on indomethacin-induced ulcers. Furthermore the effectiveness of amylin against indomethacin-induced lesions when administered after the ulcerogenic process has started suggests that amylin is involved not only in the protection but also in the healing mechanisms in this type of ulcer.

Effects of amylin and salmon calcitonin on beta-endorphin-induced growth hormone and prolactin secretion in the rat.

In this study we examined the possible interplay of amylin (AMY) and salmon calcitonin (sCT) in the central control of growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) secretion in male rats. For this purpose we first compared effects of central intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) admininstration of various doses of AMY (2.5-2,500 ng/rat) and sCT (2.2-220 ng/rat) on beta-endorphin (beta-END, 0.5 microg/rat)-induced GH and PRL secretion. AMY and sCT dose-dependently inhibited beta-END-induced GH secretion, whereas only sCT was able to inhibit beta-END-induced PRL secretion. To examine whether the GH inhibitory effect of AMY was due to the possible cross-reactivity of AMY and sCT on the same receptors in the CNS, we pretreated some rats with the AMY antagonist (AMY8-37, 2. 5 microg/rat, i.c.v.). AMY8-37 significantly enhanced the GH-stimulatory action of beta-END. AMY8-37, administered prior to AMY and sCT, significantly removed the inhibitory effect of both AMY and sCT on beta-END-induced GH release, suggesting that both peptides mediate their response on GH through a common receptor. In vitro competition binding studies on rat hypothalamic membranes have shown that both AMY and sCT compete with [125I]rAMY binding with half inhibition (IC50) values of 3.6 x 10(-11) and 1.6 x 10(-10) M, respectively. Binding of [125I]sCT was inhibited by sCT with an IC50 of 1.09 x 10(-10) M and to a lesser extent by AMY with an IC50 of 1. 3 x 10(-6) M. Thus it is possible that the two peptides recognize a common hypothalamic receptor but with different affinities (sCT > AMY). Overall these data indicate that AMY behaves as a mimic of sCT in the central control of GH secretion. The failure of AMY, at variance with sCT, to modify the PRL-releasing activity of beta-END indicates that different receptor subtypes for sCT are involved in the endocrine effects of sCT and only those mediating the modulatory action of GH respond to AMY.

The effect of somatostatin on experimental inflammation in rats.

UNLABELLED: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of somatostatin administration on experimentally induced inflammation in rats. Inflammation was induced by the intraplantar injection of carrageenan (50 microL) into the hind paw of the rat. Animals were treated intraplantarly with somatostatin in a volume of 50 microL at different doses (2.5, 25, and 250 ng, 10 microg). The inflammatory response was studied 120, 180, and 240 min after drug administration. The antinociceptive effect of somatostatin was determined by using the Randall and Selitto test and by local production of beta-endorphin from lymphocytes obtained from popliteal lymph nodes. Data show that small doses of somatostatin were the most effective in reducing hyperalgesia. Moreover, our results show that somatostatin treatment significantly increased beta-endorphin in lymphocytes from popliteal lymph nodes. The secretion of opioid peptides, which enhance analgesia, could be stimulated by locally administered somatostatin. IMPLICATIONS: Acute pain because of intraplantar inflammation induced in rats by carrageenan injection was significantly reduced by small-dose, local administration of somatostatin, which possibly favors beta-endorphin release as a mechanism. These results may have implications regarding treatment of pain conditions associated with an inflammatory response.

Protection by amylin of gastric erosions induced by indomethacin or ethanol in rats.

1. The effect of amylin on gastric ulcers induced by oral administration of indomethacin (Indo, 20 mg kg-1 at a dosing volume of 5 ml) or ethanol 50% (EtOH, 1 ml/rat) was investigated in conscious rats. 2. Amylin given intracerebroventricularly (0.22, 0.66 and 2.2 micrograms/rat, i.c.v.) demonstrated a dose-dependent cytoprotective effect against both Indo and EtOH-induced ulcers. In contrast, amylin, given subcutaneously at doses effective in inhibiting acid gastric secretion (2.5, 10 and 40 micrograms kg-1, s.c.), did not show any cytoprotective effect. 3. The interaction between amylin and endogenous nitric oxide (NO) in the maintenance of gastric mucosal integrity was investigated by pretreating the rats with a selective inhibitor of NO-synthesis, NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 25 and 70 mg kg-1, s.c.). Administration of L-NAME to rats did not significantly increase the degree of the Indo-induced ulcer index and was not able to remove the protective effect of amylin on Indo-induced ulcers, thus excluding a role for endogenous NO in mediating the protective effect of this peptide. 4. To determine whether the cytoprotective effect of amylin was mediated by endogenous prostaglandins, we studied the effect of amylin (2.2 micrograms/rat, i.c.v.) on EtOH- induced ulcers in rats pretreated with Indo (10 mg kg-1, s.c.) to inhibit prostanoid biosynthesis; Indo was injected 30 min before amylin and EtOH after a further 30 min. Pretreatment with Indo did not significantly increase the ulcer index induced by EtOH but counteracted the ability of amylin to prevent the ulcer formation. 5. These findings suggest that amylin exerts a gastroprotective activity that is not strictly related to inhibition of acid gastric secretion and can be partly explained through a prostaglandin-dependent mechanism mediated by receptors for the peptide in the brain. Amylin might be considered as a new brain-gut peptide.

Continuous subcutaneous infusion of ketorolac in cancer neuropathic pain unresponsive to opioid and adjuvant drugs. A case report.

Ketorolac is a new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) having a potent nonopioid analgesic activity. Administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSI), its analgesic efficacy has been documented in the treatment of somatic and visceral cancer pain whilst it has been shown to be ineffective in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Here is a description of a cancer patient with neuropathic pain unresponsive to anticonvulsant or antidepressant drugs administered in association or not with oral opioids but who was successfully treated with ketorolac alone via CSI. Furthermore, the analgesia lasted over 75 days of treatment without any significant renal and gastric side effects.

Subtotal but not unilateral nephrectomy induces hyperplasia and protooncogene expression.

It is generally accepted that renal compensatory growth after unilateral nephrectomy (Uni) is due to prominent hypertrophy with no involvement of protooncogenes. Neither the balance between hypertrophy and hyperplasia nor the expression of the early-growth-related genes has been studied after subtotal nephrectomy (Nx). The occurrence of cystic tubular dilatations after Nx may suggest an excessive cell proliferation in this model. We measured DNA, RNA, and protein content, number of nuclei per tubular section, as well as c-fos, c-jun, c-myc, c-H-ras, c-sis, and c-erb-B2 protooncogene expression in kidneys taken at time of surgery and 2, 7, and 14 days after sham operation (control rats), Uni, or Nx. After Uni, hyperplasia was greater than expected (+79% for DNA at day 14) and was associated with moderate hypertrophy (+11% for protein/DNA ratio). After Nx, compensatory growth was due only to hyperplasia (+117% for DNA at day 14), with unchanged protein/DNA ratio (vs. Uni, P < 0.02). The greater hyperplasia after Nx was confirmed by nuclei counting. The protooncogene mRNA expression was constantly absent in control and Uni rats, whereas that of c-fos and c-jun genes was detected in Nx rats at day 14 with a 2- to 12-fold increment. The c-fos and c-jun protein levels were also increased at that time in Nx rats. This suggests the following: 1) the cellular events following Uni and Nx are not the same, and 2) the late protooncogene expression in Nx exclusively could favor a particular type of cell proliferation possibly more related with cystic formation than with actual compensatory growth.