Stockholm score of lesion detection on computed tomography following mild traumatic brain injury (SELECT-TBI): study protocol for a multicentre, retrospective, observational cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is one of the most common reasons for emergency department (ED) visits. A portion of patients with mTBI will develop an intracranial lesion that might require medical or surgical intervention. In these patients, swift diagnosis and management is paramount. Several guidelines have been developed to help direct patients with mTBI for head CT scanning, but they lack specificity, do not consider the interactions between risk factors and do not provide an individualised estimate of intracranial lesion risk. The aim of this study is to create a model that estimates individualised intracranial lesion risks in patients with mTBI who present to the ED. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a retrospective cohort study conducted at ED hospitals in Stockholm, Sweden. Eligible patients are adults (≥15 years) with mTBI who presented to the ED within 24 hours of injury and performed a CT scan. The primary outcome will be a traumatic lesion on head CT. The secondary outcomes will be any clinically significant lesion, defined as an intracranial finding that led to neurosurgical intervention, hospital admission ≥48 hours due to TBI or death due to TBI. Machine-learning models will be applied to create scores predicting the primary and secondary outcomes. An estimated 20 000 patients will be included. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr: 2020-05728). The research findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scientific publications and presentations at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04995068.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for removal of large colorectal neoplasias in an outpatient setting: a single-center series of 660 procedures in Sweden.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technique developed in Japan for the removal of large lesions in the GI tract. Because of the complexity of the technique, implementation in Western health care has been slow. An ESD procedure is usually followed by hospital admission. Our aim was to investigate if ESD of colorectal lesions can be performed in an outpatient setting. METHODS: Six hundred sixty colorectal ESD procedures between 2014 and 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. All patients referred to the unit with an early colorectal neoplasm >20 mm without signs of deep invasion were considered eligible for an ESD procedure. RESULTS: Of 660 lesions, 323 (48.9%) were localized in the proximal colon, 102 (15.5%) in the distal colon, and 235 (35.6%) in the rectum. Median lesion size was 38 mm (interquartile range, 30-50) and median procedure duration 70 minutes (interquartile range, 45-115). En-bloc resection was achieved in 620 cases (93.9%). R0 resection was achieved in 492 en-bloc resections (79.4%), whereas the number of Rx and R1 resections was 124 (20.0%) and 4 (.6%), respectively. Low-grade dysplasia was found in 473 cases (71.7%), high-grade dysplasia in 144 (21.8%), and adenocarcinoma in 34 (5.1%). Six hundred twelve procedures (92.7%) were scheduled as outpatient, and 33 of these underwent unplanned admission. Forty-eight cases (7.3%) were planned as inpatient procedures. The rate of full wall perforation was 38 (5.8%), in which 35 (92.1%) were managed endoscopically and 3 patients (7.9%) required emergency surgery. Forty-six patients (7.0%) sought medical attention within 30 days because of bleeding (21 [3.2%]), abdominal tenderness (16 [2.4%]), and other reasons (9 [1.4%]). Twenty-four of these patients were admitted for observation for a median of 2 days (range, 1-7). Ten of these patients were treated with antibiotics, and 6 patients required blood transfusion. None required additional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: ESD of colorectal lesions can be safely performed in an outpatient setting in a well-selected patient.

High density of S100A9 positive inflammatory cells in prostate cancer stroma is associated with poor outcome.

PURPOSE: To elucidate if the density of inflammatory cells expressing S100A9 in malignant and surrounding non-malignant prostate tissues is a prognostic marker for outcome in prostate cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tissue was obtained from 358 men diagnosed with prostate cancer at transurethral resection of the prostate due to obstructive voiding problems, of which 260 were then followed with watchful waiting. Tissue microarrays of both malignant and non-malignant tissues were stained with an antibody against S100A9. The number of stained inflammatory cells was scored and related to clinical outcome and histopathological parameters of known prognostic value. RESULTS: A high number of inflammatory cells expressing S100A9 in both malignant and surrounding non-malignant tissues were associated with significantly shorter cancer-specific survival. This association remained significant when Gleason score and local tumour stage were analysed together with S100A9 in a Cox regression model. Low number of S100A9 positive cells in non-malignant stroma was correlated to significantly longer cancer-specific survival also in patients with Gleason score 8-10 tumours. S100A9 positive cells in tumour stroma were correlated with Gleason score, hyaluronan, platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFR-ß), and androgen receptor (inverse correlation) in tumour stroma. S100A9 positive cells in non-malignant stroma correlated with androgen receptor in this tissue compartment (inverse correlation). CONCLUSIONS: A high number of S100A9 positive inflammatory cells in tumour stroma and in non-malignant stroma were associated with shorter cancer-specific survival in prostate cancer patients.