ABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to determine, for the first time, in a prospective cross-sectional multicenter study, the prevalence of iron deficiency (ID) in an Austrian pregnant population. A cohort of 425 pregnant women was classified into four groups of different weeks of gestation. Group 1 was monitored longitudinally, while groups 2-4, iron status, were sampled only once. Evaluation of the prevalence of ID was performed by comparing the diagnostic criteria of the WHO to the cutoff proposed by Achebe MM and Gafter-Gvili A (Achebe) and the Austrian Nutrition Report (ANR). In comparison with the ANR, the prevalence of ID was lower in group 1 and higher in groups 2-4 (17.2% vs. 12.17%, 25.84%, 35.29%, and 41.76%, respectively) (p-values < .01 except group 1). According to WHO, the prevalence in group 1 was 12.17% at inclusion, 2 months later 31.7%, and further 2 months later 65.71%, respectively. According to Achebe, the number of cases doubled; for group 1, the number of cases rose from 13 to 42 (115 patients total); for groups 2-4, we observed an increase from 112 to 230 (340 patients total). This study reported a prevalence of around 12% at the beginning of pregnancy, which increased during pregnancy up to 65%. ID can have a massive impact on quality of life, justifying screening, as iron deficiency would be easy to diagnose and treat.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of screening for open spina bifida (OSB) integrated into the routine first-trimester screening. METHOD: This is a prospective multicentre study of 4,755 women undergoing first-trimester ultrasound scans over a 4-year period. Measurements of the brainstem (BS) diameter and brainstem-to-occipital-bone (BSOB) distance were performed. The cisterna magna (CM) was measured in the tilted axial view. RESULTS: Pregnancy outcome data were available for 4,658 fetuses included in this study. There were 5 fetuses with OSB, and in all of them, the BS/BSOB ratio and the CM measurements were abnormal. The sensitivity and specificity of a BS/BSOB ratio >1 were 100%. The sensitivity of a CM width <5th centile was 100%, and the specificity was 95.1%. In 4.6% of cases, the BS/BSOB ratio was between the 95th percentile and 1. In 87.1% of these cases, the CM was normal, and 12.9% had a CM below the 5th percentile. CONCLUSION: Screening for OSB is feasible in routine first-trimester scans. The BS/BSOB ratio shows a very good sensitivity and specificity. In cases with near-normal values for the BS/BSOB ratio, the CM width might be helpful for further assessment.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In high-risk patients with cervical incompetence, laparoscopic cerclage is a promising treatment option. However, the procedure exhibits relevant surgical risks. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a surgical "needle-free" technique for minimally invasive, laparoscopically placed cervico-isthmic cerclage in high-risk patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study over a 10-year period of pre- and postconceptional cerclage placement. The included patients either experienced previous transvaginal cerclage (TVC) failure or were not eligible for TVC. Laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage using a needle-less mersilene tape was performed via a broad ligament window lateral to the uterine vessels. RESULTS: Laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage was successfully performed in all included women with a median operation time of 62 min. We did not observe any intra- or postoperative complications, particularly no bleeding complications. Nine of 11 women became pregnant and/or carried out a successful pregnancy, respectively. Importantly, we did not observe any cases of miscarriage or mid-trimester loss. Two patients did not conceive; however, their medical histories did include Asherman's syndrome and advanced maternal age. CONCLUSION: Transabdominal laparoscopic "needle-free" cerclage is a safe and effective treatment option for a well-selected group of women at high risk of cervical incompetence. It provides good obstetric results without increasing perioperative morbidity.
Subject(s)
Cerclage, Cervical/methods , Uterine Cervical Incompetence/surgery , Adult , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Operative Time , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Prenatal diagnosis of placenta increta and percreta is essential to avoid potentially life-threatening hemorrhage by optimizing peripartal management. Invasive placentation presents significant challenges at cesarean section even for highly skilled surgeons. In the four cases of placenta increta/percreta presented here we tried to avoid hysterectomy by leaving the placenta behind and tried to accelerate regression of placental tissue by administering methotrexate. The outcome in each of the four women was different, but no major bleeding occurred in any of the cases. Close follow-up for many weeks is mandatory.
