Atherosclerotic risk factors and their association with hospital mortality among patients with first myocardial infarction (from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction).

Few studies have examined associations between atherosclerotic risk factors and short-term mortality after first myocardial infarction (MI). Histories of 5 traditional atherosclerotic risk factors at presentation (diabetes, hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, and family history of premature heart disease) and hospital mortality were examined among 542,008 patients with first MIs in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (1994 to 2006). On initial MI presentation, history of hypertension (52.3%) was most common, followed by smoking (31.3%). The least common risk factor was diabetes (22.4%). Crude mortality was highest in patients with MI with diabetes (11.9%) and hypertension (9.8%) and lowest in those with smoking histories (5.4%) and dyslipidemia (4.6%). The inclusion of 5 atherosclerotic risk factors in a stepwise multivariate model contributed little toward predicting hospital mortality over age alone (C-statistic = 0.73 and 0.71, respectively). After extensive multivariate adjustments for clinical and sociodemographic factors, patients with MI with diabetes had higher odds of dying (odds ratio [OR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20 to 1.26) than those without diabetes and similarly for hypertension (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.11). Conversely, family history (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.73), dyslipidemia (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.64), and smoking (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.88) were associated with decreased mortality (C-statistic = 0.82 for the full model). In conclusion, in the setting of acute MI, histories of diabetes and hypertension are associated with higher hospital mortality, but the inclusion of atherosclerotic risk factors in models of hospital mortality does not improve predictive ability beyond other major clinical and sociodemographic characteristics.

Number of coronary heart disease risk factors and mortality in patients with first myocardial infarction.

CONTEXT: Few studies have examined the association between the number of coronary heart disease risk factors and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in community practice. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between the number of coronary heart disease risk factors in patients with first myocardial infarction and hospital mortality. DESIGN: Observational study from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction, 1994-2006. PATIENTS: We examined the presence and absence of 5 major traditional coronary heart disease risk factors (hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and family history of coronary heart disease) and hospital mortality among 542,008 patients with first myocardial infarction and without prior cardiovascular disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All-cause in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A majority (85.6%) of patients who presented with initial myocardial infarction had at least 1 of the 5 coronary heart disease risk factors, and 14.4% had none of the 5 risk factors. Age varied inversely with the number of coronary heart disease risk factors, from a mean age of 71.5 years with 0 risk factors to 56.7 years with 5 risk factors (P for trend < .001). The total number of in-hospital deaths for all causes was 50,788. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates were 14.9%, 10.9%, 7.9%, 5.3%, 4.2%, and 3.6% for patients with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 risk factors, respectively. After adjusting for age and other clinical factors, there was an inverse association between the number of coronary heart disease risk factors and hospital mortality adjusted odds ratio (1.54; 95% CI, 1.23-1.94) among individuals with 0 vs 5 risk factors. This association was consistent among several age strata and important patient subgroups. CONCLUSION: Among patients with incident acute myocardial infarction without prior cardiovascular disease, in-hospital mortality was inversely related to the number of coronary heart disease risk factors.

Trends in reperfusion strategies, door-to-needle and door-to-balloon times, and in-hospital mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction enrolled in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), rapid reperfusion is associated with improved mortality. As such, door-to-needle (D2N) and door-to-balloon (D2B) times have become metrics of quality of care and targets for intense quality improvement. METHODS: The National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) collected data regarding reperfusion therapy, its timing and in-hospital mortality among STEMI patients from 1990 through 2006. RESULTS: Since 1990, NRMI has enrolled 1,374,232 STEMI patients at 2,157 hospitals. Among those, 774,279 (56.3%) were eligible for reperfusion upon arrival. The proportion receiving fibrinolytic therapy fell from 52.5% in 1990 to 27.6% in 2006 (P < .001), while the proportion undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) increased from 2.6% to 43.2%. Among reperfusion-eligible patients who received fibrinolytic therapy, there was a nearly linear decline in median D2N time from 59 minutes in 1990 to 29 minutes in 2006 (P < .001 for trend) as well as a decrease in mortality from 7.0% in 1994 to 6.0% in 2006 (P < .001). Among those undergoing pPCI, D2B time among nontransfer patients declined linearly from 111 minutes in 1994 to 79 minutes in 2006 (P < .001) with a decline in mortality from 8.6% to 3.1% (P < .001). The relative improvement in mortality attributable to improvements in D2N time was 16.3% and to D2B time was 7.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Since 1990, there has been a progressive decline in D2N and D2B time among reperfusion-eligible STEMI patients. These improvements have contributed, at least in part, to a progressive decline in mortality.

Use of combination evidence-based medical therapy prior to acute myocardial infarction (from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-4).

Utilization rates of aspirin, beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and statins singly and as part of a multidrug regimen before hospitalization were measured in 109,540 patients with a history of coronary artery disease presenting with acute myocardial infarction to 1,283 hospitals participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-4. The profile of patients receiving none or only 1 of these therapies was compared with that of patients receiving any 3 or all 4 agents. Most patients (58%) with a history of coronary artery disease presenting with acute myocardial infarction were on none or only 1 of these effective medications at hospital admission. Only 21% of patients were on >or=3 of these therapies. Older age, female gender, and Medicare or no insurance coverage was significantly associated with previous receipt of or=3 of these therapies. In conclusion, data from this large national registry have indicated that most patients with a history of CAD were not receiving the recommended combination of cardiac medications before their AMI.

Hospital performance with myocardial reperfusion therapy: are hospitals capable of meeting established guidelines?

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether hospitals are capable of delivering myocardial reperfusion therapy in a manner consistent with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. DATA SOURCE AND STUDY SETTING: Data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI)-2 and NRMI-3 were used. NRMI is an observational study, sponsored by Genentech, conducted from June 1994 through June 2000 and involving 1876 hospitals and 1,310,030 patients across the United States. The protocol calls for collecting data on all patients with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. The setting was community and tertiary hospitals in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: This observational study used process capability analysis. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Overall, no hospital was deemed capable of delivering myocardial reperfusion therapy consistent with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. The highest thrombolytic and angioplasty CPUs were 0.44 and 0.52, respectively-well below the traditional value of 1.0 signifying minimum capability. In addition, among the hospitals examined, there remained a wide degree of variability in process capability, ranging from -0.69 to 0.52. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial reperfusion therapy performance measurement systems relying solely on mean time-to-reperfusion conceal true process performance, thereby obscuring quality improvement opportunities and strategies for improvement. Health care providers, purchasers, regulators, and other organizations interested in measuring and improving health care quality are encouraged to incorporate process capability analysis into their myocardial reperfusion therapy performance measurement and quality management systems.

Hospital transfer of patients with acute myocardial infarction: the effects of age, race, and insurance type.

BACKGROUND: Many factors precipitate the transfer of patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction, including clinical status and the need for diagnostic testing and therapeutic interventions not available at the admitting hospital. The objectives of this study were to assess the frequency of transfer to another hospital and to determine whether nonmedical factors, such as age, sex, race, and insurance status, are associated with transfer. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of patients with acute myocardial infarction who were enrolled in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 from June 1994 through March 1998. The Registry involves 1674 hospitals in the United States. All patients survived to the time of hospital discharge or until transfer. Multivariable logistic regression models, with transfer as the outcome variable, were developed for the entire sample, as well as for subgroups determined by the interventional capabilities of the admitting hospital. RESULTS: Of 537,283 patients with acute myocardial infarction, 152,310 (28%) were transferred to another hospital after admission. After adjustment for differences in clinical and hospital characteristics, factors that were most associated with a reduced odds of transfer included older age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42 to 0.44 for those aged >75 vs. <65 years), African-American race (OR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.67 to 0.71 for African Americans vs. whites), and Medicaid/self-pay insurance status (OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.70 for Medicaid/self-pay vs. commercial insurance). These effects were most apparent for patients admitted to hospitals without full invasive diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities, but persisted to some extent among those admitted to hospitals with full invasive services. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that nonmedical factors, including age, race, and insurance type, affect decisions regarding the transfer of patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. As only a minority of the nation's hospitals offers a full range of cardiovascular diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, these findings reinforce ongoing concerns about disparities in access to health care services for some patients.