Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Phys Med Biol ; 2024 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38776944

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance guided transcranial focused ultrasound holds great promises for treating neurological disorders. This technique relies on skull aberration correction which requires computed tomography (CT) scans of the skull of the patients. Recently, ultra-short time-echo (UTE) magnetic resonance (MR) sequences have unleashed the MRI potential to reveal internal bone structures. In this study, we measure the efficacy of transcranial aberration correction using UTE images. Approach. We compare the efficacy of transcranial aberration correction using UTE scans to CT based correction on four skulls and two targets using a clinical device (Exablate Neuro, Insightec, Israel). We also evaluate the performance of a custom ray tracing algorithm using both UTE and CT estimates of acoustic properties and compare these against the performance of the manufacturer's proprietary aberration correction software. Main results. UTE estimated skull maps in Hounsfield units (HU) had a mean absolute error of 242 ± 20 HU (n=4). The UTE skull maps were sufficiently accurate to improve pressure at the target (no correction: 0.44 ± 0.10, UTE correction: 0.79 ± 0.05, manufacturer CT: 0.80 ± 0.05), pressure confinement ratios (no correction: 0.45 ± 0.10, UTE correction: 0.80 ± 0.05, manufacturer CT: 0.81 ± 0.05), and targeting error (no correction: 1.06 ± 0.42 mm, UTE correction 0.30 ± 0.23 mm, manufacturer CT: 0.32 ± 0.22) (n=8 for all values). When using CT, our ray tracing algorithm performed slightly better than UTE based correction with pressure at the target (UTE: 0.79 ± 0.05, CT: 0.84 ± 0.04), pressure confinement ratios (UTE: 0.80 ± 0.05, CT: 0.84 ± 0.04), and targeting error (UTE: 0.30 ± 0.23 mm, CT: 0.17 ± 0.15). Significance. These 3D transcranial measurements suggest that UTE sequences could replace CT scans in the case of MR guided focused ultrasound with minimal reduction in performance which will avoid ionizing radiation exposure to the patients and reduce procedure time and cost. .

2.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 2024 Mar 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38508592

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a common method for alleviating chronic back pain by targeting and ablating of facet joint sensory nerves. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an emerging, non-invasive, image-guided technology capable of providing thermal tissue ablation. While HIFU shows promise as a potentially superior option for ablating sensory nerves, its efficacy needs validation and comparison with existing methods. METHODS: Nine adult pigs underwent fluoroscopy-guided HIFU ablation of eight lumbar medial branch nerves, with varying acoustic energy levels: 1000 (N=3), 1500 (N=3), or 2000 (N=3) joules (J). An additional three animals underwent standard RFA (two 90 s long lesions at 80°C) of the same eight nerves. Following 2 days of neurobehavioral observation, all 12 animals were sacrificed. The targeted tissue was excised and subjected to macropathology and micropathology, with a primary focus on the medial branch nerves. RESULTS: The percentage of ablated nerves with HIFU was 71%, 86%, and 96% for 1000 J, 1500 J, and 2000 J, respectively. In contrast, RFA achieved a 50% ablation rate. No significant adverse events occurred during the procedure or follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that HIFU may be more effective than RFA in inducing thermal necrosis of the nerve.

3.
Brain Stimul ; 16(1): 48-55, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36549480

ABSTRACT

Transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) has been shown to be a safe and effective technique for non-invasive superficial and deep brain stimulation. Safe and efficient translation to humans requires estimating the acoustic attenuation of the human skull. Nevertheless, there are no international guidelines for estimating the impact of the skull bone. A tissue independent, arbitrary derating was developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to take into account tissue absorption (0.3 dB/cm-MHz) for diagnostic ultrasound. However, for the case of transcranial ultrasound imaging, the FDA model does not take into account the insertion loss induced by the skull bone, nor the absorption by brain tissue. Therefore, the estimated absorption is overly conservative which could potentially limit TUS applications if the same guidelines were to be adopted. Here we propose a three-layer model including bone absorption to calculate the maximum pressure transmission through the human skull for frequencies ranging between 100 kHz and 1.5 MHz. The calculated pressure transmission decreases with the frequency and the thickness of the bone, with peaks for each thickness corresponding to a multiple of half the wavelength. The 95th percentile maximum transmission was calculated over the accessible surface of 20 human skulls for 12 typical diameters of the ultrasound beam on the skull surface, and varies between 40% and 78%. To facilitate the safe adjustment of the acoustic pressure for short ultrasound pulses, such as transcranial imaging or transcranial ultrasound stimulation, a table summarizes the maximum pressure transmission for each ultrasound beam diameter and each frequency.


Subject(s)
Brain , Skull , Humans , Skull/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography , Acoustics , Head
4.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1364: 397-409, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35508885

ABSTRACT

Focused ultrasound holds great promise in therapy for its ability to target non-invasively deep seated tissues with non-ionizing therapeutic beams. Nevertheless, brain applications have been hampered for decades by the presence of the skull. The skull indeed strongly reflects, refracts and absorbs ultrasound, which defocuses the therapeutic ultrasound beams. In this chapter, we will first show how the structure of the skull impacts the ultrasound beams and how it narrows the frequency range that can be envisioned for transcranial therapy. We will then introduce different methods that have been developed and optimized to compensate the defocusing effect of the bone. Finally, we will provide an overview of past, current and future treatments of brain disorders.


Subject(s)
Brain Diseases , Ultrasonic Therapy , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Brain Diseases/therapy , Humans , Skull/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography
5.
Appl Phys Lett ; 114(20): 203702, 2019 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31148844

ABSTRACT

Measuring temperature during focused ultrasound (FUS) procedures is critical for characterization, calibration, and monitoring to ultimately ensure safety and efficacy. Despite the low cost and the high spatial and temporal resolutions of temperature measurements using thermocouples, the viscous heating (VH) artifact at the thermocouple-tissue interface requires reading corrections for correct thermometric analysis. In this study, a simulation pipeline is proposed to correct the VH artifact arising from temperature measurements using thermocouples in FUS fields. The numerical model consists of simulating a primary source of heating due to ultrasound absorption and a secondary source of heating from viscous forces generated by the thermocouple in the FUS field. Our numerical validation found that up to 90% of the measured temperature rise was due to VH effects. Experimental temperature measurements were performed using thermocouples embedded in fresh chicken breast samples. Temperature corrections were demonstrated for single high-intensity FUS pulses at 3.1 MHz and for multiple pulses (3.1 MHz, 100 Hz, and 500 Hz pulse repetition frequency). The VH accumulated during sonications and produced a temperature increase of 3.1 °C and 15.3 °C for the single and multiple pulse sequences, respectively. The methodology presented here enables the decoupling of the temperature increase generated by absorption and VH. Thus, more reliable temperature measurements can be extracted from thermocouple measurements by correcting for VH.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...