Glucocorticoid receptor phosphorylation, transformation, and DNA binding.

Glucocorticoid receptors were isolated by immunoadsorption from cytosol of L cells that were cultured for 18 h in the presence of [32P]orthophosphate, and the phosphorylation state of the receptor was examined before and after transformation to the DNA-binding state. Temperature-mediated transformation of the glucocorticoid receptor under cell-free conditions results in no change in receptor size or degree of phosphorylation. When cytosol containing transformed receptors is incubated with DNA-cellulose, 30-50% of the receptors are able to bind to DNA and the remainder do not bind to DNA. Both the heated receptors that bind to DNA and the receptors that do not bind to DNA are phosphorylated to the same degree. When intact cells containing 32P-labeled receptors are incubated for 2 h at 0 degree C with triamcinolone acetonide and then for 20 min at 37 degrees C in the presence of the hormone, 80% of the receptor becomes tightly associated with the nucleus in a manner that is both temperature-dependent and ligand-dependent. Approximately 80% of the nuclear-bound receptor is extracted with 0.4 M NaCl. Both the cytosolic receptor from cells incubated at 0 degree C and the salt-extracted nuclear receptor from cells incubated at 37 degrees C have been resolved by immunoadsorption to protein A-Sepharose with the BuGR1 monoclonal antibody and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by immunoblotting and autoradiography of the immunoblots. In addition, direct measurements of the amounts of 32P contained per unit of receptor protein were performed for receptors transformed both in the intact cell and in cell-free lysates. The results demonstrate that the untransformed receptor and the nuclear-bound transformed receptor are labeled with 32P to the same extent.

The heat-stable cytosolic factor that promotes glucocorticoid receptor binding to DNA is neither thioredoxin nor ribonuclease.

Treatment of rat liver cytosol containing temperature-transformed [3H]dexamethasone-bound receptors at 0 degree C with the sulfhydryl modifying reagent methyl methanethiosulfonate (MMTS) inhibits the DNA-binding activity of the receptor, and DNA-binding activity is restored after addition of dithiothreitol (DTT). However, transformed receptors that are treated with MMTS and then separated from low Mr components of cytosol by passage through a column of Sephadex G-50 have very little DNA-binding activity when DTT is added to regenerate sulfhydryl moities. The receptors will bind to DNA if whole liver cytosol or boiled liver cytosol is added in addition to DTT. The effect of boiled cytosol is mimicked by purified rat thioredoxin or bovine RNase A in a manner that does not reflect the reducing activity of the former or the catalytic activity of the latter. This suggests that the reported ability of each of these heat-stable peptides to stimulate DNA binding by glucocorticoid receptors is not a biologically relevant action. We suggest that stimulation of DNA binding of partially purified receptors by boiled cytosol does not constitute a reconstitution of a complete cytosolic system in which the dissociated receptor must associate with a specific heat-stable accessory protein required for DNA binding, as has been suggested in the "two-step" model of receptor transformation recently proposed by Schmidt et al. (Schmidt T.J., Miller-Diener, A., Webb M.L. and Litwack G. (1985) J. biol. Chem. 260, 16255-16262).

The role of sulfhydryl groups in permitting transformation and DNA binding of the glucocorticoid receptor.

Treatment of rat liver cytosol containing temperature-transformed, [3H]dexamethasone-bound receptors at 0 degree C with the sulfhydryl-modifying reagent methyl methanethiosulfonate (MMTS) inhibits the DNA-binding activity of the receptor, and DNA-binding activity is restored after addition of dithiothreitol (DTT). When cytosol containing untransformed receptors is heated at 25 degrees C in the presence of MMTS, the 90-kDa heat shock protein dissociates from the receptor in the same manner as in the absence of MMTS, and the receptor will bind to DNA-cellulose if DTT is added subsequently at 0 degree C. These observations are consistent with the conclusion of Bodwell et al. (Bodwell, J. E., Holbrook. N. J. and Munck, A. (1984) Biochemistry 23, 1392-1398) that sulfhydryl moieties on the receptor are absolutely required for the receptor to bind to DNA, and they show that the sulfhydryl-modifying reagent does not inhibit the temperature-mediated dissociation of the heteromeric receptor complex that accompanies transformation to the DNA-binding state. When steroid-receptor complexes that are prebound to DNA-cellulose are exposed to MMTS, the steroid rapidly dissociates, but the receptor remains bound to DNA. Thus, the presence of steroid is not required for the receptor to remain bound to DNA in a high affinity manner. Treatment of cytosol containing transformed glucocorticoid-receptor complexes at 0 degrees C with 20 mM hydrogen peroxide also inactivates the DNA-binding activity of the receptor. The peroxide-induced inactivation is reversed by DTT. Incubation of rat liver cytosol containing untransformed glucocorticoid-receptor complexes at 25 degrees C with hydrogen peroxide prevents their transformation to the DNA-binding form as shown by their inability to bind to DNA-cellulose after addition of DTT. The presence of peroxide during heating of the cytosol also prevents dissociation of the receptor complex as assayed both by reduction in sedimentation value of the receptor and by dissociation of the 90-kDa heat shock protein from the steroid-binding protein. These results strongly suggest that critical sulfur moieties in the receptor complex must be in a reduced form for the temperature-mediated dissociation of the receptor to occur.

Relationship of the 90-kDa murine heat shock protein to the untransformed and transformed states of the L cell glucocorticoid receptor.

Incubation of molybdate-stabilized L cell cytosol with a monoclonal antibody directed against the 100-kDa glucocorticoid-binding protein causes the immune-specific adsorption to protein A-Sepharose of both the 100-kDa glucocorticoid receptor and the 90-kDa murine heat shock protein (hsp90) (Sanchez, E. R., Toft, D. O., Schlesinger, M. J., and Pratt, W. B. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 12398-12401). When the glucocorticoid receptor in cytosol is transformed to the DNA-binding state, hsp90 dissociates. In this paper, we show that temperature-mediated dissociation of hsp90 from the receptor is a hormone-dependent event in the same manner as temperature-mediated transformation to the DNA-binding state. In contrast to temperature-mediated transformation, ammonium sulfate causes both dissociation of hsp90 from the receptor and conversion of the receptor to the DNA-binding form in a manner that does not require the presence of steroid. The untransformed form of the glucocorticoid receptor and the strongly negatively charged hsp90 protein behave similarly on DEAE-cellulose chromatography, suggesting that the hsp90 component may contribute significantly to the net negative charge behavior of the non-DNA-binding form of the receptor complex.

Glucocorticoid receptor phosphorylation in mouse L-cells.

This paper summarizes our observations on the phosphorylation state of untransformed and transformed glucocorticoid receptors isolated from 32P-labeled L-cells. The 300-350-kDa 9S untransformed murine glucocorticoid receptor complex is composed of a 100-kDa steroid-binding phosphoprotein and one or possibly two units of the 90-kDa heat shock protein (hsp90), which is also a phosphoprotein. Transformation of this complex to the 4S DNA-binding state is accompanied by dissociation of hsp90. When receptors in cytosol are transformed by heating at 25 degrees C, there is no gross change in the degree of phosphorylation of the steroid-binding protein. Both receptors that are bound to DNA after transformation under cell-free conditions and receptors that are located in the nucleus of cells incubated at 37 degrees C in the presence of glucocorticoid are labeled with 32P. The results of experiments in which the 32P-labeled receptor was submitted to limited proteolysis suggest that the 16-kDa DNA-binding domain is phosphorylated and that the 28-kDa steroid-binding domain is not.

Purification and preliminary characterization of a macromolecular inhibitor of glucocorticoid receptor binding to DNA.

Rat liver cytosol contains a heat-labile macromolecule that inhibits the binding of the transformed glucocorticoid-receptor complex to nuclei or DNA-cellulose (Milgrom, E., and Atger, M. (1975) J. Steroid Biochem. 6, 487-492; Simons, S. S., Jr., Martinez, H. M., Garcea, R. L., Baxter, J. D., and Tomkins, G. M. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 251, 334-343. We have developed a quantitative assay for the inhibitor and have purified it 600-700-fold by ammonium sulfate precipitation, ethanol precipitation, and phosphocellulose and Sephacryl S-300 chromatography. The inhibitory activity copurifies with a Mr = 37,000 protein doublet. Under low salt conditions, both the inhibitory activity and the 37-kDa protein doublet behave as high Mr aggregates that subsequently dissociate in the presence of salt. The inhibitor is positively charged at physiological pH, and it is not affected by digestion with several serine proteases or RNase. The inhibitor does not affect the transformation process, and it does not cause the release of steroid-receptor complexes that have been prebound to DNA-cellulose. The inhibitor preparation does not cleave receptors in L-cell cytosol that are covalently labeled with the site-specific affinity steroid [3H]dexamethasone 21-mesylate. If the steroid-receptor complex is first separated from the great majority of cytosol protein by transforming it and binding it to DNA-cellulose, addition of the inhibitor preparation results in receptor cleavage. Under these conditions, cleavage can be blocked with 1-chloro-3-tosylamido-7-amino-L-2-heptanone and antipain, but protease inhibitors do not affect the inhibition of DNA binding that occurs in whole cytosol. The inhibitor acts through an interaction with the receptor, not with DNA. We suggest that the inhibitor may prove to be a useful tool for studying the interaction of the steroid-receptor complex with DNA or nuclei and speculate that it may be important in determining normal events of the receptor cycle as they occur in the intact cell.

Evidence that the endogenous heat-stable glucocorticoid receptor-activating factor is thioredoxin.

Extraction of rat liver cytosol with 10% charcoal at 4 degrees C inactivates specific glucocorticoid-binding capacity. The steroid-binding capacity of extracted cytosol can be restored by adding dithiothreitol or by incubating with boiled liver cytosol at 20 degrees C in the presence of 10 mM sodium molybdate. Two components of boiled cytosol are required for receptor activation: NADPH and an endogenous heat-stable protein with an apparent Mr of 12,300 by Sephadex G-50 chromatography. This endogenous receptor-activating protein coelutes on Sephadex G-50 chromatography with endogenous thioredoxin activity, and it can be replaced in the activating system by purified Escherichia coli thioredoxin. These observations suggest that glucocorticoid receptors in cytosol preparations are maintained in a reduced, steroid-binding state by a NADPH-dependent, thioredoxin-mediated reducing system.